Zimbarra Cabrita Inês, Ruisanchez Cristina, Dawson David, Grapsa Julia, North Bernard, Howard Luke S, Pinto Fausto J, Nihoyannopoulos Petros, Gibbs J Simon R
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, NHLI, Du Cane Road, W12 0HS London, UK.
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010 Sep;11(8):719-24. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq051. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
Myocardial performance index (MPI) measured by conventional Doppler is routinely used to assess right ventricular (RV) systolic function in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Our aim was to determine whether MPI measured by Doppler tissue imaging (tMPI) is effective in assessing RV function in these patients.
Retrospectively, we have studied 196 patients with chronic PH [pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) 81 +/- 40 mmHg] and 37 healthy volunteers (PASP of 27 +/- 7 mmHg). According to the exclusion criteria, 172 patients were included in the final study cohort. All patients were evaluated for RV systolic function by different parameters. MPI was measured by both conventional and tissue Doppler imaging. Bland-Altman analysis showed moderate agreement between MPI and tMPI (the mean difference was -0.02, absolute difference = -0.32 to 0.29; 95% intervals of agreement, percentage of average = -46.6 to 40.8%). In 50 consecutive PH patients where additional parameters were calculated, we found a significant correlation between tMPI and RV ejection fraction (r = -0.73, P< 0.0001) and RV fractional area change (r = -0.58, P< 0.0001). No significant inter- and intra-observer variability was identified.
This study demonstrated a moderate agreement between two methods of measuring MPI. A good correlation of tMPI with RV ejection fraction and RV fractional area change was found indicating that tMPI might be superior to MPI Doppler. tMPI is a parameter unaffected by RV geometry and importantly has the advantage of simultaneously recording the time intervals from the same cardiac cycle.
传统多普勒测量的心肌性能指数(MPI)通常用于评估肺动脉高压(PH)患者的右心室(RV)收缩功能。我们的目的是确定通过组织多普勒成像测量的MPI(tMPI)在评估这些患者的右心室功能方面是否有效。
我们回顾性研究了196例慢性PH患者[肺动脉收缩压(PASP)81±40 mmHg]和37名健康志愿者(PASP为27±7 mmHg)。根据排除标准,最终研究队列纳入了172例患者。所有患者均通过不同参数评估右心室收缩功能。MPI通过传统和组织多普勒成像进行测量。Bland-Altman分析显示MPI和tMPI之间具有中度一致性(平均差异为-0.02,绝对差异=-0.32至0.29;95%一致性区间,平均值百分比=-46.6至40.8%)。在连续计算了其他参数的50例PH患者中,我们发现tMPI与右心室射血分数(r=-0.73,P<0.0001)和右心室面积变化分数(r=-0.58,P<0.0001)之间存在显著相关性。未发现观察者间和观察者内的显著变异性。
本研究表明两种测量MPI的方法之间具有中度一致性。发现tMPI与右心室射血分数和右心室面积变化分数具有良好的相关性,表明tMPI可能优于多普勒MPI。tMPI是一个不受右心室几何形状影响的参数,重要的是具有同时记录同一心动周期时间间隔的优势。