Suppr超能文献

与基于药效动力学的呼吸机相关性肺炎经验性抗生素选择临床路径相关的住院时间和住院费用。

Length of stay and hospital costs associated with a pharmacodynamic-based clinical pathway for empiric antibiotic choice for ventilator-associated pneumonia.

机构信息

Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut 06102, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2010 May;30(5):453-62. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.5.453.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine hospital costs associated with the use of a clinical pathway implemented in our intensive care units (ICUs) to optimize antibiotic regimen selection for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) compared with costs in a historical control group treated according to prescriber preference.

DESIGN

Retrospective cost analysis from the hospital perspective.

SETTING

Single, tertiary-care medical center.

PATIENTS

One hundred sixty-six adults with VAP from the medical, surgical, and neurotrauma ICUs (73 historical control patients [2004-2005] and 93 patients given an empiric antibiotic clinical pathway for VAP [2006-2007]).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The VAP clinical pathway consisted of an ICU-specific three-drug regimen that considered local minimum inhibitory concentration distributions and a pharmacodynamically optimized dosing strategy. Hospital cost data were collected and inflated to 2007 according to the consumer price index. The VAP-related length of treatment, hospitalization costs, and antibiotic costs were compared between groups. The median VAP length of treatment was 24 days (interquartile range [IQR] 13-35 days] and 11 days (IQR 7-17 days) for historical and clinical pathway groups, respectively (p<0.001). Daily hospital costs were similar for both cohorts over the first 7 days, after which costs declined significantly for patients treated with the clinical pathway (p<0.001). When controlling for baseline differences between groups and length of stay before development of VAP, patients treated with the clinical pathway had shorter lengths of ICU stay after VAP, shorter total hospital lengths of stay after VAP, and lower hospital costs after the treatment of VAP. Median total antibiotic costs for individual patients were similar between groups ($535 [IQR $261-998] vs $482 [IQR $222-985] clinical pathway vs control, p=0.45), and the proportion of VAP hospital resources consumed by antibiotics for both groups was low.

CONCLUSION

Although aggressive dosing of more costly antibiotics was empirically prescribed using the clinical pathway, patients in this group exhibited a shorter duration of treatment, reduced hospital length of stay after VAP, and lower hospital costs without any significant increase in antibiotic expenditures.

摘要

研究目的

与历史对照治疗组(根据医生偏好选择治疗方案)相比,确定在重症监护病房(ICU)使用临床路径来优化呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)患者抗生素治疗方案选择所产生的医院成本。

设计

从医院角度进行的回顾性成本分析。

设置

单一的三级医疗中心。

患者

166 例来自内科、外科和神经创伤 ICU 的 VAP 成年患者(73 例历史对照患者[2004-2005 年]和 93 例接受经验性 VAP 抗生素临床路径治疗的患者[2006-2007 年])。

测量和主要结果

VAP 临床路径包括一种 ICU 专用的三药方案,该方案考虑了当地最低抑菌浓度分布和优化的药效学给药策略。根据消费者价格指数收集并膨胀了 2007 年的医院成本数据。比较了两组之间与 VAP 相关的治疗时间、住院费用和抗生素费用。历史组和临床路径组的 VAP 治疗中位时间分别为 24 天(四分位距[IQR]13-35 天)和 11 天(IQR 7-17 天)(p<0.001)。两组在前 7 天的每日住院费用相似,此后临床路径组的费用显著下降(p<0.001)。在控制两组间的基线差异和 VAP 发生前的住院时间后,接受临床路径治疗的患者在 VAP 后 ICU 住院时间更短,VAP 后总住院时间更短,VAP 治疗后的住院费用更低。两组患者的单个患者总抗生素费用中位数相似(临床路径组为$535[IQR$261-998] vs 对照组为$482[IQR$222-985],p=0.45),两组的 VAP 医院资源消耗比例均较低。

结论

尽管使用临床路径经验性地开出了更昂贵抗生素的大剂量治疗,但该组患者的治疗时间更短,VAP 后住院时间更短,VAP 后住院费用更低,而抗生素支出没有明显增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验