School of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 May;139(5):1325-32, 1332.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.046.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with high mortality and poor neurological recovery. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation can cause ischemia-reperfusion injury of the whole body and brain. We assessed the hypothesis that controlled reperfusion of the whole body with cardiopulmonary bypass would limit reperfusion injury after 15 minutes of normothermic cardiac arrest with better survival and neurological recovery.
Eleven pigs were exposed to normothermic ischemia for 15 minutes by inducing ventricular fibrillation, followed by cardiopulmonary resuscitation (control group, n = 4) or 60 minutes of cardiopulmonary bypass (treatment group, n = 7). Conditions of reperfusion and the reperfusate were controlled with cardiopulmonary bypass. Animals were observed for up to 7 days, and neurological assessment (Neurological Deficit Score: 0, normal; 500, brain death), magnetic resonance imaging, and brain histology were performed.
All animals in the control group died after 20 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 4). All (n = 7) survived in the treatment group. Clinically apparent neurological recovery occurred within 24 hours; 1 fully conscious pig could not walk. The Neurological Deficit Score was 98 +/- 31 in all animals (n = 7) after 24 hours and decreased to 0 after 48 hours in 4 of 5 eligible animals; 1 animal had a Neurological Deficit Score of 110 after 3 days. Brain histology revealed hypoxic and apoptotic neurons with an inconclusive correlation regarding neurological recovery.
Clinically apparent neurological recovery after a period of 15 minutes of cardiac arrest occurred with cardiopulmonary bypass instead of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for reperfusing the whole body. This approach contrasts with cardiopulmonary resuscitation, in which resuscitation has been reported as successful after only 3 to 5 minutes of cardiac arrest. Cardiopulmonary bypass might be a key to improve survival and neurological recovery after cardiac arrest.
心肺复苏与高死亡率和较差的神经恢复有关。心肺复苏会导致全身和大脑的缺血再灌注损伤。我们评估了这样一个假设,即通过体外循环对全身进行控制性再灌注,将限制 15 分钟常温心脏停搏后再灌注损伤,从而提高存活率和神经恢复。
11 头猪通过诱导心室颤动暴露于常温缺血 15 分钟,随后进行心肺复苏(对照组,n=4)或 60 分钟体外循环(治疗组,n=7)。通过体外循环控制再灌注和再灌注液条件。观察动物最多 7 天,并进行神经评估(神经缺陷评分:0,正常;500,脑死亡)、磁共振成像和脑组织学检查。
对照组所有动物在心肺复苏 20 分钟后均死亡(n=4)。治疗组所有动物(n=7)均存活。临床明显的神经恢复发生在 24 小时内;1 头完全清醒的猪不能行走。所有动物(n=7)在 24 小时后的神经缺陷评分为 98±31,5 头有资格的动物中有 4 头在 48 小时后降至 0,1 头动物在 3 天后的神经缺陷评分为 110。脑组织学显示缺氧和凋亡神经元,但与神经恢复无明确相关性。
在心脏停搏 15 分钟后,用体外循环代替心肺复苏对全身进行再灌注,可出现临床明显的神经恢复。这种方法与心肺复苏相反,心肺复苏据报道在心脏停搏仅 3 至 5 分钟后即可成功复苏。体外循环可能是提高心脏停搏后存活率和神经恢复的关键。