• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Increased late mortality with percutaneous stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis relative to coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

作者信息

Takagi Hisato, Matsui Masafumi, Umemoto Takuya

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 May;139(5):1351-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.01.024.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.01.024
PMID:20412967
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Increased late mortality with percutaneous stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis relative to coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of observational studies.与冠状动脉搭桥术相比，经皮支架置入术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄的晚期死亡率增加：一项观察性研究的荟萃分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 May;139(5):1351-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.01.024.
2
Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass surgery for treatment of left main coronary artery disease: is it time to change guidelines?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合支架植入术与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病：是否是时候改变指南了？
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb;2(1):59-68. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.831701.
3
Acute and long-term outcome of unprotected left main coronary angioplasty compared to the anticipated surgical risk.与预期手术风险相比，非保护左主干冠状动脉血管成形术的急性和长期结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;7(5):871-7. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.178632. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
4
Trifurcation left main coronary artery percutaneous revascularization--pushing catheters and envelopes.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan 1;73(1):32-3. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21907.
5
Comparison between coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis (the Bologna Registry).冠状动脉成形术与冠状动脉搭桥手术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄的比较（博洛尼亚注册研究）
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jul 1;98(1):54-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.070. Epub 2006 May 4.
6
A meta-analysis of randomized control trials comparing minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery.一项比较微创直接冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左前降支近端狭窄的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.01.018. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
7
[Commentary to the article: Buszman P, Kiesz SR, Bochenek A, et al. Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:538-45].[对文章的评论：布斯兹曼 P、基耶斯 SR、博切内克 A 等。与外科血运重建相比，无保护左主干支架置入术的急性和远期结果。《美国心脏病学会杂志》2008 年；51:538 - 45]
Kardiol Pol. 2008 Mar;66(3):361-2, discussion 362-3.
8
[Unprotected left main coronary artery stenting: immediate and medium-term outcomes of 24 procedures].
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2008 Aug;57(4):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 May 27.
9
Percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2007 Mar;5(2):213-20. doi: 10.1586/14779072.5.2.213.
10
Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization.非保护左主干支架置入术与外科血运重建术的近期和远期疗效比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Feb 5;51(5):538-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.054.

引用本文的文献

1
Bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main disease. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无保护左主干病变的比较：随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Herz. 2013 Feb;38(1):48-56. doi: 10.1007/s00059-012-3596-y. Epub 2012 Mar 11.