Suppr超能文献

腰椎退行性脊柱畸形:后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)及改良经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF)的手术选择

Lumbar degenerative spinal deformity: Surgical options of PLIF, TLIF and MI-TLIF.

作者信息

Hey Hwee Weng Dennis, Hee Hwan Tak

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2010 Apr;44(2):159-62. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.62066.

Abstract

Degenerative disease of the lumbar spine is common in ageing populations. It causes disturbing back pain, radicular symptoms and lowers the quality of life. We will focus our discussion on the surgical options of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative spinal deformities, which include symptomatic spondylolisthesis and degenerative scoliosis. Through a description of each procedure, we hope to illustrate the potential benefits of TLIF over PLIF. In a retrospective study of 53 ALIF/PLIF patients and 111 TLIF patients we found reduced risk of vessel and nerve injury in TLIF patients due to less exposure of these structures, shortened operative time and reduced intra-operative bleeding. These advantages could be translated to shortened hospital stay, faster recovery period and earlier return to work. The disadvantages of TLIF such as incomplete intervertebral disc and vertebral end-plate removal and potential occult injury to exiting nerve root when under experienced hands are rare. Hence TLIF remains the mainstay of treatment in degenerative deformities of the lumbar spine. However, TLIF being a unilateral transforaminal approach, is unable to decompress the opposite nerve root. This may require contralateral laminotomy, which is a fairly simple procedure. The use of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) to treat degenerative lumbar spinal deformity is still in its early stages. Although the initial results appear promising, it remains a difficult operative procedure to master with a steep learning curve. In a recent study comparing 29 MI-TLIF patients and 29 open TLIF, MI-TLIF was associated with longer operative time, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, with no difference in SF-36 scores at six months and two years. Whether it can replace traditional TLIF as the surgery of choice for degenerative lumbar deformity remains unknown and more studies are required to validate the safety and efficiency.

摘要

腰椎退行性疾病在老年人群中很常见。它会引起令人困扰的背痛、神经根症状,并降低生活质量。我们将重点讨论后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)以及微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF)治疗腰椎退行性脊柱畸形的手术选择,这些畸形包括症状性椎体滑脱和退行性脊柱侧凸。通过对每种手术的描述,我们希望阐明TLIF相对于PLIF的潜在优势。在一项对53例接受前路腰椎椎间融合术/后路腰椎椎间融合术患者和111例接受经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术患者的回顾性研究中,我们发现接受经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的患者血管和神经损伤风险降低,原因是这些结构的暴露较少、手术时间缩短以及术中出血减少。这些优势可转化为住院时间缩短、恢复期加快以及更早重返工作岗位。经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的缺点,如椎间盘和椎体终板切除不完全以及在经验不足的医生操作下对出口神经根潜在的隐匿性损伤很少见。因此,经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术仍然是腰椎退行性畸形治疗的主要方法。然而,经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术作为一种单侧经椎间孔入路,无法对另一侧神经根进行减压。这可能需要对侧椎板切开术,这是一个相当简单的手术。使用微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF)治疗退行性腰椎脊柱畸形仍处于早期阶段。尽管初步结果看起来很有前景,但它仍然是一种难以掌握的手术,学习曲线很陡。在最近一项比较29例接受微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术患者和29例接受开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术患者的研究中,微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与手术时间延长、失血较少、住院时间缩短相关,在6个月和2年时SF-36评分无差异。它是否能取代传统经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术作为退行性腰椎畸形的首选手术尚不清楚,需要更多研究来验证其安全性和有效性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Lumbar spondylosis: clinical presentation and treatment approaches.腰椎间盘突出症:临床表现与治疗方法。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2009 Jun;2(2):94-104. doi: 10.1007/s12178-009-9051-x. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
6
Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusions.腰椎椎间融合的微创技术
Orthop Clin North Am. 2007 Jul;38(3):373-86; abstract vi. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.04.002.
9
Degenerative disorders of the lumbar and cervical spine.腰椎和颈椎的退行性疾病。
Orthop Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;36(3):255-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.01.007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验