Suppr超能文献

通过一氧化碳气体、99mTc标记红细胞、125I白蛋白和T1824技术测定的血容量和血浆容量。

Blood and plasma volumes determined by carbon monoxide gas, 99mTc-labelled erythrocytes, 125I-albumin and the T 1824 technique.

作者信息

Thomsen J K, Fogh-Andersen N, Bülow K, Devantier A

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Herlev Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1991 Apr;51(2):185-90. doi: 10.1080/00365519109091106.

Abstract

The total amount of circulating haemoglobin was measured in 12 subjects using a direct carbon monoxide (CO)-technique. O2 plus 50 ml CO gas was rebreathed in a small closed system for 10 min. Carboxyhaemoglobin (HbCO)% was measured with a diode-array spectrophotometer before and after the rebreathing. delta HBCO% and the amount of CO in moles (nCO) were used to calculate the total amount of circulating haemoglobin. Blood volume was calculated by dividing this figure with the haemoglobin concentration and plasma volume by multiplying the blood volume with 1-haematocrit. The calculated blood and plasma volumes were compared with the simultaneously measured volumes by 99mTc-labelled erythrocytes, 125I-albumin and T 1824 (Evans Blue). Mean blood volume determined with CO was 4557 ml (3251-6576 ml) compared with 4527 ml (3390-6527 ml) with 99mTc-labelled erythrocytes (r = 0.97). Mean plasma volume by T 1824 was 2895 ml (1972-3658 ml) vs 2898 ml (1815-3714) ml using 125I-albumin, (r = 0.99). The plasma volumes calculated from the blood volumes determined by the erythrocyte-labelling methods were 5-10% lower than those measured with labelled albumin. There was a better correlation between the plasma volumes by the albumin methods and by the CO-technique (r = 0.98 and r = 0.97, respectively) than between the plasma volumes by the albumin methods and by 99mTc-erythrocytes (r = 0.90 and r = 0.87, respectively).

摘要

采用直接一氧化碳(CO)技术对12名受试者的循环血红蛋白总量进行了测量。在一个小型封闭系统中,让受试者再呼吸含50毫升CO气体的O₂,持续10分钟。再呼吸前后,使用二极管阵列分光光度计测量碳氧血红蛋白(HbCO)%。利用ΔHbCO%和CO的摩尔量(nCO)来计算循环血红蛋白总量。通过将该数值除以血红蛋白浓度来计算血容量,通过将血容量乘以(1-血细胞比容)来计算血浆容量。将计算得到的血容量和血浆容量与通过99mTc标记红细胞、125I-白蛋白和T 1824(伊文思蓝)同时测量得到的容量进行比较。用CO测定的平均血容量为4557毫升(3251 - 6576毫升),而用99mTc标记红细胞测定的平均血容量为4527毫升(3390 - 6527毫升)(r = 0.97)。用T 1824测定的平均血浆容量为2895毫升(1972 - 3658毫升),而用125I-白蛋白测定的平均血浆容量为2898毫升(1815 - 3714毫升)(r = 0.99)。通过红细胞标记法测定的血容量计算得到的血浆容量比用标记白蛋白测量的血浆容量低5 - 10%。白蛋白法和CO技术测定的血浆容量之间的相关性(分别为r = 0.98和r = 0.97)比白蛋白法和99mTc红细胞法测定的血浆容量之间的相关性(分别为r = 0.90和r = 0.87)更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验