Spine Section, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Orthopaedic Department E, Aarhus University Hospital, Building 1A, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Eur Spine J. 2010 Dec;19(12):2200-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1373-2. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
Older people are at increased risk of non-union after spinal fusion, but little is known about the factors determining the quality of the fusion mass in this patient group. The aim of this study was to investigate fusion mass bone quality after uninstrumented spinal fusion and to evaluate if it could be improved by additional direct current (DC) electrical stimulation. A multicenter RCT compared 40 and 100 μA DC stimulation with a control group of uninstrumented posterolateral fusion in patients older than 60 years. This report comprised 80 patients who underwent DEXA scanning at the 1 year follow-up. The study population consisted of 29 men with a mean age of 72 years (range 62-85) and 51 women with a mean age of 72 years (range 61-84). All patients underwent DEXA scanning of their fusion mass. Fusion rate was assessed at the 2 year follow-up using thin slice CT scanning. DC electrical stimulation did not improve fusion mass bone quality. Smokers had lower fusion mass BMD (0.447 g/cm(2)) compared to non-smokers (0.517 g/cm(2)) (P = 0.086). Women had lower fusion mass BMD (0.460 g/cm(2)) compared to men (0.552 g/cm(2)) (P = 0.057). Using linear regression, fusion mass bone quality, measured as BMD, was significantly influenced by gender, age of the patient, bone density of the remaining part of the lumbar spine, amount of bone graft applied and smoking. Fusion rates in this cohort was 34% in the control group and 33 and 43% in the 40 and 100 μA groups, respectively (not significant). Patients classified as fused after 2 years had significant higher fusion mass BMD at 1 year (0.592 vs. 0.466 g/cm(2), P = 0.0001). Fusion mass bone quality in older patients depends on several factors. Special attention should be given to women with manifest or borderline osteoporosis. Furthermore, bone graft materials with inductive potential might be considered for this patient population.
老年人脊柱融合后发生非融合的风险增加,但对于这一患者群体融合质量的决定因素知之甚少。本研究的目的是研究非器械脊柱融合后融合质量的骨质量,并评估直流电(DC)电刺激是否可以改善。一项多中心 RCT 将 40 和 100 μA DC 刺激与年龄大于 60 岁的患者后路侧方融合的未器械化对照组进行比较。本报告包括 80 名在 1 年随访时接受 DEXA 扫描的患者。研究人群包括 29 名男性,平均年龄 72 岁(范围 62-85 岁)和 51 名女性,平均年龄 72 岁(范围 61-84 岁)。所有患者均接受融合质量的 DEXA 扫描。在 2 年随访时使用薄层 CT 扫描评估融合率。直流电电刺激并未改善融合质量的骨质量。吸烟者的融合质量 BMD(0.447 g/cm(2))低于非吸烟者(0.517 g/cm(2))(P = 0.086)。女性的融合质量 BMD(0.460 g/cm(2))低于男性(0.552 g/cm(2))(P = 0.057)。通过线性回归,融合质量骨密度,作为 BMD,显著受性别、患者年龄、腰椎剩余部分的骨密度、应用的骨移植物量和吸烟的影响。在该队列中,对照组的融合率为 34%,40 μA 和 100 μA 组分别为 33%和 43%(无显著差异)。2 年后被归类为融合的患者在 1 年时具有显著更高的融合质量 BMD(0.592 与 0.466 g/cm(2),P = 0.0001)。老年患者的融合质量骨密度取决于多个因素。应特别关注有明显或临界骨质疏松症的女性。此外,对于这一患者群体,可能需要考虑具有诱导潜力的骨移植物材料。