Suppr超能文献

胺碘酮治疗期间临床诊断不明确的帕金森综合征的 FP-CIT SPECT:一项随访研究

FP-CIT SPECT in clinically inconclusive Parkinsonian syndrome during amiodarone treatment: a study with follow-up.

作者信息

Hambÿe Anne-Sophie, Vervaet Ann, Dethy Sophie

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU-Charleroi, Blvd Janson, 92, B-6000 Charleroi, Belgium.

出版信息

Nucl Med Commun. 2010 Jun;31(6):583-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether dopamine transport system imaging by FP-CIT single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can be helpful to differentiate idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) from secondary Parkinsonism induced by amiodarone.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with Parkinsonism during amiodarone therapy were evaluated by clinical neurological examination and FP-CIT SPECT. Thereafter, amiodarone was discontinued whenever possible and antiparkinsonian treatment was modified, if required. Clinical neurological status was reevaluated within a year of the SPECT examination.

RESULTS

At baseline, clinical neurological examination was quite similar in all patients. No clinical symptom was able to clearly orientate the diagnosis toward IPD or drug-induced Parkinsonism. Using SPECT, the number of normal and abnormal patients was evenly distributed. In the abnormal SPECT group, amiodarone was modified in seven patients of whom six improved at follow-up. Antiparkinsonian treatment had been modified in all the patients. In the four cases with no amiodarone changes, clinical improvement was noted if antiparkinsonian treatment was optimized (three patients). In the 11 normal SPECT patients, amiodarone was modified in five patients. All patients ameliorated (two) or even normalized (three). In the six patients with normal SPECT in whom amiodarone had not been modified, symptoms remained stable despite the absence of antiparkinsonian treatment.

CONCLUSION

In patients treated with amiodarone, IPD is sometimes clinically difficult to differentiate from drug-induced Parkinsonism. Using FP-CIT, a normal scan suggests drug-induced Parkinsonism, hence, there is no need for antiparkinsonian treatment and all possible attempts to reduce or preferably stop amiodarone. An abnormal scan, on the other hand, indicates IPD. In this case, treating IPD seems to have more impact on motor changes than modifying the antiarrhythmic drug.

摘要

目的

评估通过FP-CIT单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)进行多巴胺转运系统成像是否有助于鉴别特发性帕金森病(IPD)与胺碘酮所致的继发性帕金森综合征。

方法

对22例在胺碘酮治疗期间出现帕金森综合征的患者进行临床神经学检查和FP-CIT SPECT评估。此后,尽可能停用胺碘酮,并根据需要调整抗帕金森病治疗方案。在SPECT检查后一年内对临床神经学状态进行重新评估。

结果

基线时,所有患者的临床神经学检查结果非常相似。没有临床症状能够明确将诊断导向IPD或药物性帕金森综合征。使用SPECT时,正常和异常患者的数量分布均匀。在SPECT异常组中,7例患者调整了胺碘酮治疗,其中6例在随访时病情改善。所有患者均调整了抗帕金森病治疗方案。在4例未改变胺碘酮治疗的患者中,如果优化抗帕金森病治疗(3例患者),则观察到临床改善。在11例SPECT正常的患者中,5例患者调整了胺碘酮治疗。所有患者病情改善(2例)甚至恢复正常(3例)。在6例SPECT正常且未调整胺碘酮治疗的患者中,尽管未进行抗帕金森病治疗,症状仍保持稳定。

结论

在接受胺碘酮治疗的患者中,IPD有时在临床上难以与药物性帕金森综合征相鉴别。使用FP-CIT时,扫描结果正常提示药物性帕金森综合征,因此无需进行抗帕金森病治疗,应尽一切可能减少或最好停用胺碘酮。另一方面,扫描结果异常提示IPD。在这种情况下,治疗IPD似乎比调整抗心律失常药物对运动变化的影响更大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验