• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粘性陷阱和茎尖采样方案用于亚洲柑橘木虱(半翅目:木虱科)。

Sticky trap and stem-tap sampling protocols for the Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Psyllidae).

机构信息

United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, 2001 South Rock Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34945, USA.

出版信息

J Econ Entomol. 2010 Apr;103(2):541-9. doi: 10.1603/ec09360.

DOI:10.1603/ec09360
PMID:20429472
Abstract

Sampling statistics were obtained to develop a sampling protocol for estimating numbers of adult Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in citrus by using two different sampling methods: yellow sticky traps and stem-tap samples. A 4.0-ha block of mature orange trees was stratified into 100.4-ha strata and sampled using each method seven times over a 7-mo period. One sticky trap was deployed per tree on each of 16 trees randomly selected in each stratum, and numbers of adults on the traps were counted 1 wk later. One stem-tap sample in which the number of adults falling into a pan after three rapid taps to a branch was taken per tree on each of 16 trees randomly selected in each stratum. A sampling protocol of one yellow sticky trap on each of 20 trees, or of one stem-tap sample on each of 30 trees, distributed uniformly across an area up to 4.0 ha (excluding block edges) was projected to provide an average sampling precision rate of < or = 25% (SEM/mean x 100) at means of one or more adults per trap or stem-tap sample. Validation sampling indicated 20 sticky trap samples consistently provided the desired precision level at means of approximately two or more adults per trap but not at means of 1.0-1.5 per trap. A sample size of 30 stem-tap samples consistently provided the desired average precision level, but the precision of some individual estimates was > 25% at means of around one adult per tap sample.

摘要

采用两种不同的采样方法

黄色诱捕器和茎干敲击采样法,对柑橘成年柑橘木虱(半翅目:木虱科)数量进行估计的采样方案进行了采样统计。在一个 4.0 公顷的成熟橘树种植区内,将其分为 100.4 公顷的区,然后用这两种方法在 7 个月的时间内对每个区进行 7 次采样。在每个区的随机选择的 16 棵树中的每棵树上,都放置了一个黄色诱捕器,一周后统计诱捕器上的成虫数量。在每个区的随机选择的 16 棵树中的每棵树上,通过快速敲击三次树枝,将掉入收集盘的成虫数量进行计数。在每个区的随机选择的 16 棵树中的每棵树上,都进行一次茎干敲击采样,每次敲击后收集落入收集盘的成虫数量。预测方案是在 4.0 公顷的范围内(不包括区块边缘),均匀分布 20 棵树上的一个黄色诱捕器或 30 棵树上的一个茎干敲击采样器,每次采样预计会有一个或更多的成虫,这一方案的平均采样精度为 <或= 25%(SEM/mean x 100)。验证采样表明,20 个诱捕器样本每次采样有大约 2 个或更多成虫时,可保持预期的精度水平,但当每次采样有 1.0-1.5 个成虫时,精度则无法达到预期水平。30 个茎干敲击采样器样本的采样方案每次采样都能保持预期的平均精度水平,但在每次采样大约有一个成虫时,部分样本的精度 > 25%。

相似文献

1
Sticky trap and stem-tap sampling protocols for the Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Psyllidae).粘性陷阱和茎尖采样方案用于亚洲柑橘木虱(半翅目:木虱科)。
J Econ Entomol. 2010 Apr;103(2):541-9. doi: 10.1603/ec09360.
2
Sampling Methods for Detection and Monitoring of the Asian Citrus Psyllid (Hemiptera: Psyllidae).亚洲柑橘木虱(半翅目:木虱科)检测与监测的抽样方法
Environ Entomol. 2015 Jun;44(3):780-8. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvv032. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
3
An assessment of yellow sticky card traps as indicators of the abundance of adult Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in citrus.评估黄色粘虫板诱捕器作为柑橘园中柑桔木虱成虫(半翅目:木虱科)数量指标的情况。
J Econ Entomol. 2009 Feb;102(1):446-52. doi: 10.1603/029.102.0158.
4
Population ecology and phenology of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in two Florida citrus groves.佛罗里达州两片柑橘林中柑橘木虱(半翅目:木虱科)的种群生态学与物候学
Environ Entomol. 2008 Aug;37(4):914-24. doi: 10.1603/0046-225X(2008)37[914:PEAPOD]2.0.CO;2.
5
Evaluation of Yellow Sticky Traps Baited With Citrus Scents, Coconut Oil, and Commercial Lures as a Simple Tool to Monitor Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) Under Tropical Dry Forest Conditions.评估以柑橘香味、椰子油和商业诱捕剂为诱饵的黄色粘虫板作为在热带干燥森林条件下监测柑橘木虱(半翅目:木虱科)的一种简单工具。
J Econ Entomol. 2018 Dec 14;111(6):2746-2754. doi: 10.1093/jee/toy293.
6
The Development and Evaluation of Insect Traps for the Asian Citrus Psyllid, (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), Vector of Citrus Huanglongbing.亚洲柑橘木虱(半翅目:木虱科)——柑橘黄龙病传播媒介——诱捕器的研发与评估
Insects. 2022 Mar 16;13(3):295. doi: 10.3390/insects13030295.
7
Dispersion patterns and sampling plans for Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in citrus.柑橘木虱(半翅目:木虱科)在柑橘中的分布模式与抽样方案
J Econ Entomol. 2008 Aug;101(4):1478-87. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493(2008)101[1478:DPASPF]2.0.CO;2.
8
Effects of a particle film on biology and behavior of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) and its infestations in citrus.一种微粒膜对柑橘木虱(半翅目:木虱科)生物学特性、行为及其在柑橘上侵染情况的影响
J Econ Entomol. 2007 Jun;100(3):847-54. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[847:eoapfo]2.0.co;2.
9
Rate, placement and timing of aldicarb applications to control Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), in oranges.涕灭威施用于橙子以防治亚洲柑橘木虱(Diaphorina citri Kuwayama,半翅目:木虱科)的施药速率、施药位置和施药时间。
Pest Manag Sci. 2008 Nov;64(11):1159-69. doi: 10.1002/ps.1612.
10
Incidence of invasive Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) and its introduced parasitoid Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in Florida citrus.佛罗里达柑橘园中入侵性柑橘木虱(半翅目:木虱科)及其引进的寄生蜂辐射松突圆蚧(膜翅目:姬小蜂科)的发生率。
J Econ Entomol. 2009 Feb;102(1):247-56. doi: 10.1603/029.102.0134.

引用本文的文献

1
DNA degradation in Haplaxius crudus (Hemiptera: Cixiidae) and Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) on yellow sticky traps in Florida.佛罗里达州黄板上粗糙盲蝽(半翅目:沫蝉科)和柑橘木虱(半翅目:蚜科)的 DNA 降解。
J Insect Sci. 2023 Sep 1;23(5). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iead083.
2
Pest categorisation of .……的有害生物分类
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 6;19(1):e06357. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6357. eCollection 2021 Jan.
3
Synthetic Ligands of Olfactory Binding Proteins Modulate Aggregation Response of Asian Citrus Psyllid in the Presence of Host-Plant Volatiles.
嗅觉结合蛋白的合成配体在宿主植物挥发物存在的情况下调节亚洲柑橘木虱的聚集反应。
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Dec 20;9:1891. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01891. eCollection 2018.
4
Resistance Management for Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, in Florida.佛罗里达州亚洲柑橘木虱(Diaphorina citri Kuwayama)的抗性管理
Insects. 2017 Sep 20;8(3):103. doi: 10.3390/insects8030103.