Manlhiot Cedric, Brandão Leonardo R, Somji Zeeshanefatema, Chesney Amy L, MacDonald Catherine, Gurofsky Rebecca C, Sabharwal Tarun, Chahal Nita, McCrindle Brian W
Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Labatt Family Heart Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2010 Aug;31(6):834-42. doi: 10.1007/s00246-010-9715-8. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
Patients with severe coronary artery involvement after Kawasaki disease (KD) require long-term systemic anticoagulation. We sought to compare our experience with thrombotic coronary artery occlusions, safety profile, and degree of coronary artery aneurysm regression in KD patients treated with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus warfarin. Medical records of all KD patients diagnosed between January 1990 and April 2007 were reviewed. Of 1374 KD patients, 38 (3%) received systemic anticoagulation, 25 patients received LMWH from diagnosis onward, 12 of whom were subsequently switched to warfarin, and 13 received warfarin from onset. The frequency of thrombotic coronary artery occlusions was similar between drugs. Severe bleeding was more frequent in patients on warfarin, but minor bleeding was more frequent for patients on LMWH. Patients on warfarin were at greater risk of underanticoagulation or overanticoagulation (defined as achieving an anti-activated factor X level or an international normalized ratio below or above target level) than patients on LMWH (P < 0.05). Maximum coronary artery aneurysm z-scores diminished with time for patients on LMWH (P = 0.03) but not for those on warfarin (P = 0.55). This study suggests that LMWH is a potentially viable alternative for patients, especially young ones, with severe coronary artery involvement after KD.
川崎病(KD)后出现严重冠状动脉受累的患者需要长期进行全身抗凝治疗。我们试图比较低分子量肝素(LMWH)与华法林治疗KD患者时,在冠状动脉血栓形成、安全性以及冠状动脉瘤消退程度方面的经验。回顾了1990年1月至2007年4月期间所有确诊为KD患者的病历。在1374例KD患者中,38例(3%)接受了全身抗凝治疗,25例从诊断开始接受LMWH治疗,其中12例随后改用华法林,13例从发病开始接受华法林治疗。两种药物导致冠状动脉血栓形成的频率相似。华法林治疗的患者严重出血更为常见,但LMWH治疗的患者轻微出血更为常见。与接受LMWH治疗的患者相比,接受华法林治疗的患者发生抗凝不足或抗凝过度(定义为抗活化因子X水平或国际标准化比值低于或高于目标水平)的风险更高(P < 0.05)。接受LMWH治疗的患者冠状动脉瘤最大z评分随时间降低(P = 0.03),而接受华法林治疗的患者则未降低(P = 0.55)。这项研究表明,对于KD后出现严重冠状动脉受累的患者,尤其是年轻患者,LMWH是一种潜在可行的替代治疗方法。