Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Vox Sang. 2010 Apr;98(3 Pt 1):e225-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01273.x.
Vasovagal symptoms can discourage people who might otherwise give blood on many occasions. However, the effects of symptoms on donor retention as well as the effects of treatments to reduce vasovagal symptoms on donor retention are probably moderated by a person's confidence that they can tolerate the procedure.
Data from a study on the effects of the muscle tensing technique applied tension (AT) on donor retention were examined to determine if (1) the degree of donor ambivalence about needles influenced the impact of vasovagal symptoms on subsequent return and (2) ambivalence about needles moderated the effect of learning AT on donor return. One-year follow-up data on 614 people who had previously given blood and were randomly assigned to either a no treatment, donation-as-usual condition or one of two conditions involving AT were obtained. Self-reported degree of needle ambivalence and vasovagal symptoms were assessed during the initial blood donation.
Among participants in the no treatment group, increases in vasovagal symptoms were associated with decreases in donor return but only among people who expressed some fear of blood draws. Similarly, among people who expressed no fear of needles, learning AT had no effect on post-donation estimate of the likelihood they would give blood again or return rate. However, among people with some fear of blood draws learning AT led to both a higher estimate that they would give blood again as well as actual return rate.
The experience of vasovagal symptoms may not deter people who are generally confident in their ability to tolerate blood donation. However, among people who are ambivalent about needles, symptoms may 'confirm' pre-existing doubts about their suitability for blood donation and lead to drop-out. Targeted interventions that give the uncertain volunteer a sense of confidence that they might be able to realize their goal and become a regular blood donor may be useful.
血管迷走神经性症状可能会使许多原本愿意献血的人望而却步。然而,症状对献血者保留率的影响,以及减少血管迷走神经性症状的治疗方法对献血者保留率的影响,可能受到一个人对自己能够耐受该过程的信心的调节。
对一项关于肌肉紧张技术(AT)应用张力对献血者保留率影响的研究数据进行了检查,以确定(1)献血者对针头的矛盾程度是否会影响血管迷走神经性症状对随后返回的影响,以及(2)对针头的矛盾程度是否会调节学习 AT 对献血者返回的影响。获得了 614 名先前献过血并随机分配到无治疗、常规献血条件或两种涉及 AT 的条件之一的人的 1 年随访数据。在初始献血期间评估了自我报告的针头矛盾程度和血管迷走神经性症状。
在无治疗组的参与者中,血管迷走神经性症状的增加与献血者返回率的降低有关,但仅在那些对抽血有些恐惧的人中。同样,在那些对针头没有恐惧的人中,学习 AT 对他们在献血后再次献血的可能性或返回率的估计没有影响。然而,在对抽血有些恐惧的人中,学习 AT 导致他们再次献血的可能性和实际返回率都更高。
血管迷走神经性症状的经历可能不会阻止那些对自己耐受献血能力有信心的人。然而,在对针头犹豫不决的人中,症状可能会“证实”他们对自己是否适合献血的先前存在的疑虑,并导致退出。针对不确定的志愿者的有针对性的干预措施,让他们有信心自己可能能够实现目标并成为定期献血者,可能会有所帮助。