Suppr超能文献

腿部交叉和施加张力对献血者返回的影响。

The effects of leg crossing and applied tension on blood donor return.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Vox Sang. 2013 Nov;105(4):299-304. doi: 10.1111/vox.12055. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Repeated isometric muscle tension (applied tension) during blood donation reduces vasovagal symptoms in many donors. Experiencing vasovagal symptoms has been found to reduce blood donor return. However, does practicing applied tension improve blood donor return? Follow-up results from a randomized controlled trial are presented.

METHODS

Data were collected in mobile clinics held in several colleges and universities. During the baseline donation, participants either (1) practiced 'standard' applied tension consisting of repeated 5 s cycles of whole-body isometric muscle tension in the donation chair (N = 133), (2) practiced tension with legs crossed (N = 131), or (3) gave blood as usual (N = 140). Subsequent blood donations in the following 2 years were determined.

RESULTS

Applied tension had no effect on immediate (at the end of the baseline blood donation) rating of intention to give blood or the dichotomous measure of whether or not the participant gave blood again in the following 2 years. However, men asked to practice applied tension with legs crossed gave approximately one unit more during the follow-up period compared with men in the control group (F1,106  = 5·32, P = 0·023). This was associated significantly with adherence - men assigned to the applied tension with legs crossed condition who did not practice as instructed were no more likely to return than controls.

CONCLUSION

The results provide modest support for the idea that applied tension may increase subsequent blood donation though the results were limited to men who practiced the technique as instructed.

摘要

背景与目的

在献血过程中反复进行等长肌肉张力(应用张力)可以减少许多献血者的血管迷走神经症状。已经发现经历血管迷走神经症状会降低献血者的再次献血率。然而,练习应用张力是否会提高献血者的再次献血率?呈现了一项随机对照试验的随访结果。

方法

数据是在几所学院和大学的流动诊所收集的。在基线献血期间,参与者要么(1)练习“标准”应用张力,即在献血椅上进行重复 5 秒的全身等长肌肉张力循环(N=133),(2)练习交叉双腿的张力(N=131),或(3)像往常一样献血(N=140)。随后在接下来的 2 年内确定了后续献血情况。

结果

应用张力对立即(在基线献血结束时)献血意愿的评分或参与者在接下来的 2 年内是否再次献血的二分测量没有影响。然而,要求练习交叉双腿应用张力的男性在随访期间的献血量比对照组的男性多约 1 个单位(F1,106=5.32,P=0.023)。这与依从性显著相关——未按指示练习的交叉双腿应用张力组的男性再次献血的可能性与对照组一样低。

结论

结果为应用张力可能增加随后的献血提供了适度的支持,尽管结果仅限于按照指示练习该技术的男性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验