Suppr超能文献

剖析学龄儿童早期的口头叙事能力。

Profiling oral narrative ability in young school-aged children.

作者信息

Westerveld Marleen F, Gillon Gail T

机构信息

School of Literacies and Arts in Education, College of Education, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010 Jun;12(3):178-89. doi: 10.3109/17549500903194125.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine if oral narrative comprehension and production measures derived in a fictional story retelling task could be used to create a profile of strengths and weaknesses in oral narrative ability (Profile of Oral Narrative Ability: PONA) in young school-aged children. The story retelling task was field-tested with 169 typically developing children, aged between 5;0 and 7;6 years. Children listened twice to an unfamiliar story while looking at the pictures in a book. Comprehension questions were asked after the first exposure. Following the second exposure, children were asked to retell the story without the use of the pictures. Story retellings were analysed on measures of semantics, morphosyntax, verbal productivity, and narrative quality. Results indicated sensitivity for age on measures of comprehension, narrative quality, semantics, and verbal productivity, but not for morphosyntactic measures. Factor analysis indicated that oral narrative performance comprised three factors, explaining more than 80% of the variance. Two clinical case examples are presented, which show the potential of the PONA to reveal different patterns of strengths and weaknesses across the oral narrative measures. Although early evidence suggests the potential usefulness of the PONA, further research is now needed to test the validity, reliability and clinical application of this tool.

摘要

本研究旨在确定在虚构故事复述任务中得出的口语叙事理解和产出测量指标是否可用于勾勒低龄学童口语叙事能力的优势和劣势概况(口语叙事能力概况:PONA)。该故事复述任务在169名年龄在5岁0个月至7岁6个月之间发育正常的儿童中进行了实地测试。孩子们一边看着书中的图片,一边听两遍一个不熟悉的故事。第一次听完后会问一些理解问题。第二次听完后,要求孩子们不看图片复述故事。对故事复述进行语义、形态句法、语言产出和叙事质量方面的分析。结果表明,在理解、叙事质量、语义和语言产出测量指标上,年龄具有敏感性,但在形态句法测量指标上则不然。因素分析表明,口语叙事表现包含三个因素,解释了超过80%的方差。文中给出了两个临床案例,展示了PONA揭示口语叙事测量指标中不同优势和劣势模式的潜力。尽管早期证据表明PONA具有潜在用途,但现在还需要进一步研究来检验该工具的有效性、可靠性和临床应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验