Suppr超能文献

Cochrane 综述中的“发现总结表”提高了对关键信息的理解和快速检索能力。

Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information.

机构信息

Department of Communication, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;63(6):620-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To measure the effects of a summary-of-findings (SoF) table on user satisfaction, understanding, and time spent finding key results in a Cochrane review.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We randomized participants in an evidence-based practice workshop (randomized controlled trial [RCT] I) and a Cochrane Collaboration entities meeting (RCT II) to receive a Cochrane review with or without an SoF table. In RCT I, we measured user satisfaction. In RCT II, we measured correct comprehension and time spent finding key results.

RESULTS

RCT I: Participants with the SoF table (n=47) were more likely to "agree" or "strongly agree" that it was easy to find results for important outcomes than (n=25) participants without the SoF table-68% vs. 40% (P=0.021). RCT II: Participants with the SoF table (n=18) were more likely to correctly answer two questions regarding results than (n=15) those without the SoF table: 93% vs. 44% (P=0.003) and 87% vs. 11% (P<0.001). Participants with the SoF table spent an average of 90 seconds to find key information compared with 4 minutes for participants without the SoF table (P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

In two small trials, we found that inclusion of an SoF table in a review improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key findings compared with reviews with no SoF table.

摘要

目的

测量在 Cochrane 综述中使用结果总结表(SoF 表)对用户满意度、理解程度和查找关键结果所花费时间的影响。

研究设计和设置

我们将循证实践工作坊(随机对照试验 I)和 Cochrane 协作组织会议(随机对照试验 II)的参与者随机分组,分别接受有或无 SoF 表的 Cochrane 综述。在 RCT I 中,我们测量了用户满意度。在 RCT II 中,我们测量了正确理解和查找关键结果所花费的时间。

结果

RCT I:有 SoF 表的参与者(n=47)比没有 SoF 表的参与者(n=25)更有可能“同意”或“强烈同意”找到重要结局结果很容易,比例分别为 68%和 40%(P=0.021)。RCT II:有 SoF 表的参与者(n=18)比没有 SoF 表的参与者(n=15)更有可能正确回答两个关于结果的问题:93%对 44%(P=0.003)和 87%对 11%(P<0.001)。有 SoF 表的参与者平均花费 90 秒找到关键信息,而没有 SoF 表的参与者则需要 4 分钟(P=0.002)。

结论

在两项小型试验中,我们发现与没有 SoF 表的综述相比,在综述中包含 SoF 表可以提高理解程度和快速检索关键发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验