Department of Communication, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;63(6):620-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.014.
To measure the effects of a summary-of-findings (SoF) table on user satisfaction, understanding, and time spent finding key results in a Cochrane review.
We randomized participants in an evidence-based practice workshop (randomized controlled trial [RCT] I) and a Cochrane Collaboration entities meeting (RCT II) to receive a Cochrane review with or without an SoF table. In RCT I, we measured user satisfaction. In RCT II, we measured correct comprehension and time spent finding key results.
RCT I: Participants with the SoF table (n=47) were more likely to "agree" or "strongly agree" that it was easy to find results for important outcomes than (n=25) participants without the SoF table-68% vs. 40% (P=0.021). RCT II: Participants with the SoF table (n=18) were more likely to correctly answer two questions regarding results than (n=15) those without the SoF table: 93% vs. 44% (P=0.003) and 87% vs. 11% (P<0.001). Participants with the SoF table spent an average of 90 seconds to find key information compared with 4 minutes for participants without the SoF table (P=0.002).
In two small trials, we found that inclusion of an SoF table in a review improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key findings compared with reviews with no SoF table.
测量在 Cochrane 综述中使用结果总结表(SoF 表)对用户满意度、理解程度和查找关键结果所花费时间的影响。
我们将循证实践工作坊(随机对照试验 I)和 Cochrane 协作组织会议(随机对照试验 II)的参与者随机分组,分别接受有或无 SoF 表的 Cochrane 综述。在 RCT I 中,我们测量了用户满意度。在 RCT II 中,我们测量了正确理解和查找关键结果所花费的时间。
RCT I:有 SoF 表的参与者(n=47)比没有 SoF 表的参与者(n=25)更有可能“同意”或“强烈同意”找到重要结局结果很容易,比例分别为 68%和 40%(P=0.021)。RCT II:有 SoF 表的参与者(n=18)比没有 SoF 表的参与者(n=15)更有可能正确回答两个关于结果的问题:93%对 44%(P=0.003)和 87%对 11%(P<0.001)。有 SoF 表的参与者平均花费 90 秒找到关键信息,而没有 SoF 表的参与者则需要 4 分钟(P=0.002)。
在两项小型试验中,我们发现与没有 SoF 表的综述相比,在综述中包含 SoF 表可以提高理解程度和快速检索关键发现。