• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估全球证据、地方适应(GELA)项目对增强三个非洲国家新生儿和幼儿健康循证指南建议的影响:一项混合方法研究方案。

Evaluating the impact of the global evidence, local adaptation (GELA) project for enhancing evidence-informed guideline recommendations for newborn and young child health in three African countries: a mixed-methods protocol.

机构信息

Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 19;22(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01189-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-024-01189-5
PMID:39160559
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11334341/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poverty-related diseases (PRD) remain amongst the leading causes of death in children under-5 years in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) based on the best available evidence are key to strengthening health systems and helping to enhance equitable health access for children under five. However, the CPG development process is complex and resource-intensive, with substantial scope for improving the process in SSA, which is the goal of the Global Evidence, Local Adaptation (GELA) project. The impact of research on PRD will be maximized through enhancing researchers and decision makers' capacity to use global research to develop locally relevant CPGs in the field of newborn and child health. The project will be implemented in three SSA countries, Malawi, South Africa and Nigeria, over a 3-year period. This research protocol is for the monitoring and evaluation work package of the project. The aim of this work package is to monitor the various GELA project activities and evaluate the influence these may have on evidence-informed decision-making and guideline adaptation capacities and processes. The specific project activities we will monitor include (1) our ongoing engagement with local stakeholders, (2) their capacity needs and development, (3) their understanding and use of evidence from reviews of qualitative research and, (4) their overall views and experiences of the project.

METHODS

We will use a longitudinal, mixed-methods study design, informed by an overarching project Theory of Change. A series of interconnected qualitative and quantitative data collections methods will be used, including knowledge translation tracking sheets and case studies, capacity assessment online surveys, user testing and in-depth interviews, and non-participant observations of project activities. Participants will comprise of project staff, members of the CPG panels and steering committees in Malawi, South Africa and Nigeria, as well as other local stakeholders in these three African countries.

DISCUSSION

Ongoing monitoring and evaluation will help ensure the relationship between researchers and stakeholders is supported from the project start. This can facilitate achievement of common goals and enable researchers in South Africa, Malawi and Nigeria to make adjustments to project activities to maximize stakeholder engagement and research utilization. Ethical approval has been provided by South African Medical Research Council Human Research Ethics Committee (EC015-7/2022); The College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee, Malawi (P.07/22/3687); National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria (01/01/2007).

摘要

背景

在撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA),与贫困相关的疾病(PRD)仍然是导致 5 岁以下儿童死亡的主要原因之一。基于现有最佳证据制定的临床实践指南(CPG)是加强卫生系统的关键,并有助于增强五岁以下儿童公平获得卫生保健的机会。然而,CPG 的制定过程复杂且资源密集,在 SSA 有很大的改进空间,这也是全球证据、地方适应(GELA)项目的目标。通过增强研究人员和决策者利用全球研究制定新生儿和儿童保健领域具有地方相关性的 CPG 的能力,将最大限度地发挥研究对 PRD 的影响。该项目将在马拉维、南非和尼日利亚这三个 SSA 国家实施,为期 3 年。本研究方案是该项目监测和评估工作包的内容。该工作包的目的是监测 GELA 项目的各项活动,并评估这些活动对循证决策和指南适应能力和过程的影响。我们将监测的具体项目活动包括:(1)我们与当地利益攸关方的持续接触,(2)他们的能力需求和发展,(3)他们对定性研究综述证据的理解和使用,以及(4)他们对项目的总体看法和经验。

方法

我们将采用纵向混合方法研究设计,以一个总体项目变革理论为指导。将使用一系列相互关联的定性和定量数据收集方法,包括知识转化跟踪表和案例研究、能力评估在线调查、用户测试和深入访谈以及项目活动的非参与式观察。参与者将包括项目工作人员、马拉维、南非和尼日利亚的 CPG 小组和指导委员会成员,以及这三个非洲国家的其他当地利益攸关方。

讨论

持续的监测和评估将有助于确保从项目启动开始就为研究人员和利益攸关方之间的关系提供支持。这可以促进共同目标的实现,并使南非、马拉维和尼日利亚的研究人员能够调整项目活动,以最大限度地提高利益攸关方的参与度和研究利用度。南非医学研究理事会人类研究伦理委员会(EC015-7/2022);马拉维医学院研究和伦理委员会(P.07/22/3687);尼日利亚国家卫生研究伦理委员会(01/01/2007)已提供伦理批准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e3e/11334341/88097dbbea46/12961_2024_1189_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e3e/11334341/f80982851b1b/12961_2024_1189_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e3e/11334341/88097dbbea46/12961_2024_1189_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e3e/11334341/f80982851b1b/12961_2024_1189_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e3e/11334341/88097dbbea46/12961_2024_1189_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the impact of the global evidence, local adaptation (GELA) project for enhancing evidence-informed guideline recommendations for newborn and young child health in three African countries: a mixed-methods protocol.评估全球证据、地方适应(GELA)项目对增强三个非洲国家新生儿和幼儿健康循证指南建议的影响:一项混合方法研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 19;22(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01189-5.
2
Developing and planning country-specific integrated knowledge translation strategies: experiences from the GELA project in Malawi, Nigeria, and South Africa.制定和规划具有国家特色的综合知识转化策略:来自马拉维、尼日利亚和南非 GELA 项目的经验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 27;24(1):1418. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18934-8.
3
Using a priority setting exercise to identify priorities for guidelines on newborn and child health in South Africa, Malawi, and Nigeria.利用优先排序法,确定南非、马拉维和尼日利亚在新生儿和儿童健康方面的指南优先事项。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Apr 16;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01133-7.
4
Building sustainable capacity to adopt, adapt or develop child health guidelines, Malawi, Nigeria and South Africa.建立可持续的能力,以采用、适应或制定儿童卫生指南,马拉维、尼日利亚和南非。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Oct 1;102(10):749-756. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.291564. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
5
Newborn and child health national and provincial clinical practice guidelines in South Africa, Nigeria and Malawi: a scoping review.南非、尼日利亚和马拉维的新生儿及儿童健康国家和省级临床实践指南:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 19;24(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10682-0.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Lessons learned from Evidence-Informed Decision-Making in Nutrition & Health (EVIDENT) in Africa: a project evaluation.从非洲营养与健康循证决策(EVIDENT)中学到的经验教训:项目评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 31;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0413-6.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Study protocol: realist evaluation of effectiveness and sustainability of a community health workers programme in improving maternal and child health in Nigeria.研究方案:对尼日利亚一项社区卫生工作者计划在改善母婴健康方面的有效性和可持续性进行现实主义评估。
Implement Sci. 2016 Jun 7;11(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0443-1.
10
Strengthening capacity to use research evidence in health sector policy-making: experience from Kenya and Malawi.加强在卫生部门决策中使用研究证据的能力:肯尼亚和马拉维的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Dec 19;17(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0511-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Iron supplementation in children to prevent deficiency and anaemia: A qualitative synthesis.儿童补铁预防缺铁及贫血:一项定性综合分析
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2025 May 14;17(1):e1-e14. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4825.
2
Building sustainable capacity to adopt, adapt or develop child health guidelines, Malawi, Nigeria and South Africa.建立可持续的能力,以采用、适应或制定儿童卫生指南,马拉维、尼日利亚和南非。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Oct 1;102(10):749-756. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.291564. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
3
Newborn and child health national and provincial clinical practice guidelines in South Africa, Nigeria and Malawi: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Resources supporting trustworthy, rapid and equitable evidence synthesis and guideline development: results from the COVID-19 evidence network to support decision-making (COVID-END).支持可靠、快速且公平的证据综合及指南制定的资源:来自支持决策的2019冠状病毒病证据网络(COVID-END)的结果
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;151:88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.008. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
2
Integrated knowledge translation to advance noncommunicable disease policy and practice in South Africa: application of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework.整合知识转化以推进南非非传染性疾病政策与实践:探索、准备、实施与维持(EPIS)框架的应用
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 May 17;19(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00733-x.
3
南非、尼日利亚和马拉维的新生儿及儿童健康国家和省级临床实践指南:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 19;24(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10682-0.
Systematic review of the methodological literature for integrating qualitative evidence syntheses into health guideline development.将定性证据综合纳入健康指南制定的方法学文献的系统评价。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jul;12(4):491-505. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1483. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
4
Evidence synthesis communities in low-income and middle-income countries and the COVID-19 response.低收入和中等收入国家的证据综合社区与新冠疫情应对
Lancet. 2020 Nov 14;396(10262):1539-1541. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32141-3. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
5
Guidance we can trust? The status and quality of prehospital clinical guidance in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.我们能信赖的指南?撒哈拉以南非洲地区院前临床指南的现状与质量:一项范围综述。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;11(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
6
Enhancing capacity for clinical practice guidelines in South Africa.提高南非临床实践指南的能力。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 May 13;36:18. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.36.18.20800. eCollection 2020.
7
Rapid review methods more challenging during COVID-19: commentary with a focus on 8 knowledge synthesis steps.在新冠疫情期间快速回顾方法更具挑战性:聚焦8个知识综合步骤的评论
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.029. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
8
Development of the WHO Antenatal Care Recommendations Adaptation Toolkit: a standardised approach for countries.世卫组织产前保健建议适应工具包的制定:国家的标准化方法。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jun 22;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00554-4.
9
'Building on shaky ground'-challenges to and solutions for primary care guideline implementation in four provinces in South Africa: a qualitative study.立足不稳——南非四个省份基层医疗指南实施的挑战及解决方案:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 30;10(5):e031468. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031468.
10
Future of Evidence Ecosystem Series: Evidence ecosystems and learning health systems: why bother?证据生态系统系列的未来:证据生态系统与学习型健康系统:为何要费心?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:166-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Mar 4.