• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轮式助行器在无障碍固定路线交通中的使用:环境顺从性实地研究。

Wheeled Mobility Use on Accessible Fixed-Route Transit: A Field Study in Environmental Docility.

机构信息

Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0020, USA.

Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2117, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 10;18(6):2840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062840.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18062840
PMID:33802242
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8001639/
Abstract

Multiple field studies provide qualitative accounts of usability barriers experienced by users of wheeled mobility devices on public transit. This study aimed to examine these usability barriers from the theoretical perspective of Environmental Docility by quantifying the relationship between functional capabilities of wheeled mobility device users and ingress-egress performance on accessible fixed-route transit vehicles in an urban setting. Twenty-eight wheeled mobility users each completed three trips on a predetermined route through the local public transit system. Ingress and egress times, user-reported usability ratings and open-ended comments were analyzed. Regression analyses indicated significant interactions between age and minimum parallel-park length on ingress and egress times. Specifically, lower functional capability reflected in older age and less maneuvering ability predicted decreased performance (longer ingress-egress times), indicating less adaptability to environmental demands and agreement with the Environmental Docility Hypothesis. Usability ratings and comments revealed difficulty with negotiating access ramps and turning maneuvers in the vehicle interior and in proximity to other passengers. Despite compliance with accessibility standards, current design of transit vehicles present substantial usability barriers for wheeled mobility users. Environmental Docility provides a theoretical basis to identifying modifiable factors related to person and environment for improving usability of public transit for people aging and/or with mobility impairments.

摘要

多项现场研究提供了有关轮式移动设备在公共交通上使用的可用性障碍的定性描述。本研究旨在从环境顺应性的理论角度检查这些可用性障碍,通过量化轮式移动设备使用者的功能能力与城市环境中无障碍固定路线运输车辆的进出性能之间的关系来实现这一目标。二十八名轮式移动使用者每人在当地公共交通系统的预定路线上完成了三次旅行。对进入和退出时间、用户报告的可用性评级和开放式评论进行了分析。回归分析表明,年龄和最小平行泊车长度之间在进入和退出时间上存在显著的相互作用。具体来说,功能能力较低,表现在年龄较大和操纵能力较弱,预示着性能下降(进入退出时间延长),这表明对环境需求的适应性较差,与环境顺应性假设一致。可用性评级和评论揭示了在车辆内部和靠近其他乘客时,在进出通道和转弯操作方面存在困难。尽管符合无障碍标准,但过境车辆的当前设计为轮式移动用户带来了实质性的可用性障碍。环境顺应性为确定与人和环境相关的可修改因素提供了理论基础,以提高老龄化和/或行动不便的人对公共交通的可用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d97/8001639/947341e46f61/ijerph-18-02840-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d97/8001639/e0f42fecde12/ijerph-18-02840-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d97/8001639/2b97ecd6ed09/ijerph-18-02840-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d97/8001639/256b5ce1cdb6/ijerph-18-02840-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d97/8001639/c2672b742ce1/ijerph-18-02840-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d97/8001639/947341e46f61/ijerph-18-02840-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d97/8001639/e0f42fecde12/ijerph-18-02840-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d97/8001639/2b97ecd6ed09/ijerph-18-02840-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d97/8001639/256b5ce1cdb6/ijerph-18-02840-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d97/8001639/c2672b742ce1/ijerph-18-02840-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d97/8001639/947341e46f61/ijerph-18-02840-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Wheeled Mobility Use on Accessible Fixed-Route Transit: A Field Study in Environmental Docility.轮式助行器在无障碍固定路线交通中的使用:环境顺从性实地研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 10;18(6):2840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062840.
2
Self-reported difficulty and preferences of wheeled mobility device users for simulated low-floor bus boarding, interior circulation and disembarking.轮式移动设备使用者在模拟低地板公交车上车、车内通行和下车时自我报告的困难和偏好。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Feb;14(2):109-121. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1401128. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
3
Retrospective review of adverse incidents involving passengers seated in wheeled mobility devices while traveling in large accessible transit vehicles.回顾性分析大型无障碍运输车辆中乘坐轮椅的乘客的不良事件。
Med Eng Phys. 2010 Apr;32(3):230-6. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
4
A systematic review of public transport accessibility for people using mobility devices.使用移动设备的人公共交通可达性的系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Aug;43(16):2253-2267. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1697382. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
5
Effects of transit bus interior configuration on performance of wheeled mobility users during simulated boarding and disembarking.在模拟上下车过程中,公交内部配置对轮式移动设备使用者性能的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jul;62:94-106. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
6
Ramps remain a barrier to safe wheelchair user transit bus ingress/egress.坡道仍是安全让轮椅使用者进出公交车的障碍。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Aug;15(6):629-636. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1604824. Epub 2020 May 4.
7
Wheeled mobility device transportation safety in fixed route and demand-responsive public transit vehicles within the United States.美国固定线路和需求响应型公共交通车辆中轮式移动设备运输安全。
Assist Technol. 2012 Summer;24(2):87-101. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2012.659325.
8
Comparison of wheelchair securement systems designed for use in large accessible transit vehicles (LATVs).用于大型无障碍运输车辆(LATV)的轮椅固定系统比较。
Assist Technol. 2021 Mar 4;33(2):105-115. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2019.1604582. Epub 2019 May 9.
9
Ramp-related incidents involving wheeled mobility device users during transit bus boarding/alighting.在公交上下车过程中,涉及轮式移动设备使用者的与坡道相关的事件。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):928-33. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.013. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
10
Usability of a navigation application for travel in Quebec City with wheeled mobility device and, further validation of the Evaluation of satisfaction with geospatial assistive technology.魁北克市轮椅出行导航应用的可用性研究,以及对地理空间辅助技术满意度评估的进一步验证。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Feb;19(2):367-382. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2089739. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and dynamics of mobility device use among community-dwelling older adults in the United States.美国社区居住老年人使用移动设备的发生率及动态变化
J Elder Policy. 2024 Oct;3(2):70-94. doi: 10.1002/jey2.12011. Epub 2024 Sep 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Space Requirements for Wheeled Mobility Devices in Public Transportation: An Analysis of Clear Floor Space Requirements: (Investing in Accessible Transportation and Mobility ABE60).公共交通中轮式移动设备的空间要求:净空地板空间要求分析:(投资无障碍交通与出行ABE60)
Transp Res Rec. 2010;2145(1):66-71. doi: 10.3141/2145-08.
2
Effect of Passenger Encumbrance and Mobility Aid Use on Dwell Time Variability in Low-floor Transit Vehicles.乘客负重及助行器具使用对低地板公交车辆驻留时间变异性的影响
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2020 Feb;132:872-881. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.002.
3
Revisiting Clear Floor Area Requirements for Wheeled Mobility Device Users in Public Transportation.
重新审视公共交通中轮式移动设备使用者的净空面积要求。
Transp Res Rec. 2018 Jul;2672(8):675-685. doi: 10.1177/0361198118787082.
4
Winter Mobility and Community Participation Among People Who Use Mobility Devices: A Scoping Review.使用移动设备者的冬季出行与社区参与:一项范围综述
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2019 Nov 15;2(1):100018. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100018. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
Assessment of wheeled mobility devices provided to a commercially insured population in 2017.2017年对提供给商业保险人群的轮式移动设备的评估。
Assist Technol. 2022 May 4;34(3):308-315. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2020.1812765. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
6
Mobility scooters in urban environments: A research agenda.城市环境中的代步车:一项研究议程。
J Transp Health. 2020 Sep;18:100917. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2020.100917. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
7
Ramps remain a barrier to safe wheelchair user transit bus ingress/egress.坡道仍是安全让轮椅使用者进出公交车的障碍。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Aug;15(6):629-636. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1604824. Epub 2020 May 4.
8
Transportation Barriers to Health Care in the United States: Findings From the National Health Interview Survey, 1997-2017.美国医疗保健中的交通障碍:1997-2017 年全国健康访谈调查的结果。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jun;110(6):815-822. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305579. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
9
A systematic review of public transport accessibility for people using mobility devices.使用移动设备的人公共交通可达性的系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Aug;43(16):2253-2267. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1697382. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
10
Community participation and public transportation barriers experienced by people with disabilities.残疾人的社区参与和公共交通障碍。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(23):3275-3283. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1590469. Epub 2019 Apr 16.