Oresković D, Klarica M
Rudjer Bosković Institute, Department of Molecular Biology, Bijenicka 54, Zagreb, Croatia.
Brain Res Rev. 2010 Sep 24;64(2):241-62. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 May 26.
The first scientific and experimental approaches to the study of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) formation began almost a hundred years ago. Despite researchers being interested for so long, some aspects of CSF formation are still insufficiently understood. Today it is generally believed that CSF formation is an active energy consuming metabolic process which occurs mainly in brain ventricles, in choroid plexuses. CSF formation, together with CSF absorption and circulation, represents the so-called classic hypothesis of CSF hydrodynamics. In spite of the general acceptance of this hypothesis, there is a considerable series of experimental results that do not support the idea of the active nature of CSF formation and the idea that choroid plexuses inside the brain ventricles are the main places of formation. The main goal of this review is to summarize the present understanding of CSF formation and compare this understanding to contradictory experimental results that have been obtained so far. And finally, to try to offer a physiological explanation by which these contradictions could be avoided. We therefore analyzed the main methods that study CSF formation, which enabled such an understanding, and presented their shortcomings, which could also be a reason for the erroneous interpretation of the obtained results. A recent method of direct aqueductal determination of CSF formation is shown in more detail. On the one hand, it provides the possibility of direct insight into CSF formation, and on the other, it clearly indicates that there is no net CSF formation inside the brain ventricles. These results are contradictory to the classic hypothesis and, together with other mentioned contradictory results, strongly support a recently proposed new working hypothesis on the hydrodynamics of CSF. According to this new working hypothesis, CSF is permanently produced and absorbed in the whole CSF system as a consequence of filtration and reabsorption of water volume through the capillary walls into the surrounding brain tissue. The CSF exchange between the entire CSF system and the surrounding tissue depends on (patho)physiological conditions that predominate within those compartments.
对脑脊液(CSF)生成的首次科学实验性研究方法始于近百年前。尽管研究人员对此兴趣浓厚且历时已久,但脑脊液生成的某些方面仍未得到充分理解。如今人们普遍认为,脑脊液生成是一个活跃的耗能代谢过程,主要发生在脑室的脉络丛中。脑脊液生成,连同脑脊液吸收和循环,代表了所谓的脑脊液流体动力学经典假说。尽管这一假说已被广泛接受,但仍有相当一系列实验结果不支持脑脊液生成具有主动性的观点,也不支持脑室内部的脉络丛是主要生成部位的观点。本综述的主要目的是总结目前对脑脊液生成的理解,并将这种理解与迄今获得的相互矛盾的实验结果进行比较。最后,试图提供一种生理学解释,以避免这些矛盾。因此,我们分析了研究脑脊液生成的主要方法,正是这些方法促成了这样的理解,并指出了它们的缺点,而这些缺点也可能是对所得结果进行错误解读的原因。文中更详细地介绍了一种最近用于直接测定导水管脑脊液生成的方法。一方面,它提供了直接洞察脑脊液生成的可能性,另一方面,它清楚地表明脑室内不存在脑脊液的净生成。这些结果与经典假说相矛盾,并且与其他提到的矛盾结果一起,有力地支持了最近提出的关于脑脊液流体动力学的新工作假说。根据这一新工作假说,由于水通过毛细血管壁过滤并重吸收进入周围脑组织,脑脊液在整个脑脊液系统中持续产生和吸收。整个脑脊液系统与周围组织之间的脑脊液交换取决于这些腔室内占主导地位的(病理)生理状况。