Suppr超能文献

视觉线索与书面线索:药物注射者反应的比较。使用书面文字的调查是否低估了丙型肝炎的风险行为?

Visual versus written cues: a comparison of drug injectors' responses. Have surveys using the written word underestimated risk behaviors for hepatitis C?

机构信息

Centre for Public Health Research Directorate, Faculty of Health and Applied Social Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Castle House, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Subst Use Misuse. 2010 Aug;45(10):1491-508. doi: 10.3109/10826081003754021.

Abstract

We examined differences in responses of injecting drug users (IDUs) about sharing injecting paraphernalia using written questions ("written cues") versus video recordings of IDUs engaged in sharing behaviors ("visual cues"). Data were collected in 2007 in cities Liverpool, England and Glasgow, Scotland (N = 204). Participants completed a computer-assisted questionnaire with questions about sharing asked using visual and written cues. McNemar's chi-squared tests and logistic regression models were used. Respondents provided significantly different responses to questions about sharing when asked using visual versus written cues; a considerable proportion of IDUs said they had never shared via front/back loading and via sharing water/bleach for flushing out injecting equipment using written cues but confirmed they had participated in these behaviors when asked using visual cues. Implications and future research are discussed.

摘要

我们研究了使用书面问题(“书面提示”)和记录共用注射器具行为的视频(“视觉提示”)询问时,注射吸毒者(IDUs)对共用注射器具行为的反应差异。2007 年,在英格兰利物浦市和苏格兰格拉斯哥市收集了数据(N=204)。参与者完成了一份计算机辅助问卷,其中包含使用视觉和书面提示询问的共用问题。采用 McNemar 卡方检验和逻辑回归模型进行分析。当使用视觉提示和书面提示询问时,受访者对共用问题的回答明显不同;相当一部分 IDUs 表示,他们从未通过前后加载或共用水/漂白剂冲洗注射设备的方式进行共用,但当使用视觉提示询问时,他们确认自己参与了这些行为。讨论了其意义和未来的研究方向。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验