Centre for Public Health Research Directorate, Faculty of Health and Applied Social Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Castle House, Liverpool, UK.
Subst Use Misuse. 2010 Aug;45(10):1491-508. doi: 10.3109/10826081003754021.
We examined differences in responses of injecting drug users (IDUs) about sharing injecting paraphernalia using written questions ("written cues") versus video recordings of IDUs engaged in sharing behaviors ("visual cues"). Data were collected in 2007 in cities Liverpool, England and Glasgow, Scotland (N = 204). Participants completed a computer-assisted questionnaire with questions about sharing asked using visual and written cues. McNemar's chi-squared tests and logistic regression models were used. Respondents provided significantly different responses to questions about sharing when asked using visual versus written cues; a considerable proportion of IDUs said they had never shared via front/back loading and via sharing water/bleach for flushing out injecting equipment using written cues but confirmed they had participated in these behaviors when asked using visual cues. Implications and future research are discussed.
我们研究了使用书面问题(“书面提示”)和记录共用注射器具行为的视频(“视觉提示”)询问时,注射吸毒者(IDUs)对共用注射器具行为的反应差异。2007 年,在英格兰利物浦市和苏格兰格拉斯哥市收集了数据(N=204)。参与者完成了一份计算机辅助问卷,其中包含使用视觉和书面提示询问的共用问题。采用 McNemar 卡方检验和逻辑回归模型进行分析。当使用视觉提示和书面提示询问时,受访者对共用问题的回答明显不同;相当一部分 IDUs 表示,他们从未通过前后加载或共用水/漂白剂冲洗注射设备的方式进行共用,但当使用视觉提示询问时,他们确认自己参与了这些行为。讨论了其意义和未来的研究方向。