Division of Biology and NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jun 12;365(1547):1801-13. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0276.
Current approaches to studying the evolution of biodiversity differ in their treatment of species and higher level diversity patterns. Species are regarded as the fundamental evolutionarily significant units of biodiversity, both in theory and in practice, and extensive theory explains how they originate and evolve. However, most species are still delimited using qualitative methods that only relate indirectly to the underlying theory. In contrast, higher level patterns of diversity have been subjected to rigorous quantitative study (using phylogenetics), but theory that adequately explains the observed patterns has been lacking. Most evolutionary analyses of higher level diversity patterns have considered non-equilibrium explanations based on rates of diversification (i.e. exponentially growing clades), rather than equilibrium explanations normally used at the species level and below (i.e. constant population sizes). This paper argues that species level and higher level patterns of diversity can be considered within a common framework, based on equilibrium explanations. It shows how forces normally considered in the context of speciation, namely divergent selection and geographical isolation, can generate evolutionarily significant units of diversity above the level of reproductively isolated species. Prospects for the framework to answer some unresolved questions about higher level diversity patterns are discussed.
目前研究生物多样性进化的方法在物种和高级别多样性模式的处理上存在差异。在理论和实践中,物种被视为生物多样性具有根本意义的进化单位,广泛的理论解释了它们的起源和进化方式。然而,大多数物种的界定仍然使用仅与基础理论间接相关的定性方法。相比之下,高级别多样性模式已经受到严格的定量研究(使用系统发育学),但缺乏能够充分解释观察到的模式的理论。大多数对高级别多样性模式的进化分析都考虑了基于多样化率的非平衡解释(即指数增长的分支),而不是通常在物种水平及以下使用的平衡解释(即种群大小不变)。本文认为,基于平衡解释,可以在一个共同的框架内考虑物种水平和高级别多样性模式。它展示了通常在物种形成背景下考虑的力量,即分歧选择和地理隔离,如何在生殖隔离物种以上的水平上产生具有进化意义的多样性单位。讨论了该框架回答一些关于高级别多样性模式的未解决问题的前景。