Radcliffe Institute, Harvard University, Byerly Hall, 8 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jun 12;365(1547):1853-63. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0040.
The development of what became known as the biological species concept began with a paper by Theodosius Dobzhansky in 1935, and was amplified by a mutualistic interaction between Dobzhansky, Alfred Emerson and Ernst Mayr after the second world war. By the 1950s and early 1960s, these authors had developed an influential concept of species as coadapted genetic complexes at equilibrium. At this time many features of species were seen as group advantages maintained by selection to avoid breakdown of beneficial coadaptation and the 'gene pool'. Speciation thus seemed difficult. It seemed to require, more so than today, an external deus ex machina, such as allopatry or the founder effect, rather than ordinary within-species processes of natural selection, sexual selection, drift and gene flow. In the mid-1960s, the distinctions between group and individual selection were clarified. Dobzhansky and Mayr both understood the implications, but their views on species changed little. These group selectionist ideas now seem peculiar, and are becoming distinctly less popular today. Few vestiges of group selectionism and species-level adaptationism remain in recent reviews of speciation. One wonders how many of our own cherished views on evolution will seem as odd to future biologists.
被称为生物物种概念的发展始于 1935 年 Theodosius Dobzhansky 的一篇论文,并在第二次世界大战后 Dobzhansky、Alfred Emerson 和 Ernst Mayr 之间的互利相互作用中得到了扩展。到 20 世纪 50 年代和 60 年代初,这些作者提出了一个有影响力的概念,即物种是处于平衡状态的共同适应遗传复合体。此时,许多物种特征被视为通过选择来维持的群体优势,以避免有益的共同适应和“基因库”的崩溃。因此,物种形成似乎很困难。它似乎需要(比今天)更多的外部解围之神,例如地理隔离或奠基者效应,而不是普通的种内自然选择、性选择、漂变和基因流过程。20 世纪 60 年代中期,群体选择和个体选择之间的区别得到了澄清。Dobzhansky 和 Mayr 都理解了这些含义,但他们对物种的看法变化不大。这些群体选择主义的观点现在似乎很奇怪,而且今天越来越不受欢迎。在最近对物种形成的综述中,几乎没有群体选择主义和物种水平适应主义的痕迹。人们想知道,我们自己对进化的许多宝贵观点在未来的生物学家看来会有多么奇怪。