Miller Nora E, Strath Scott J, Swartz Ann M, Cashin Susan E
Dept. of Human Movement Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA.
J Aging Phys Act. 2010 Apr;18(2):158-70. doi: 10.1123/japa.18.2.158.
This study examined the predictive validity of accelerometers (ACC) to estimate physical activity intensity (PAI) across age and differences in intensity predictions when expressed in relative and absolute PAI terms. Ninety adults categorized into 3 age groups (20-29, 40-49, and 60-69 yr) completed a treadmill calibration study with simultaneous ACC (7164 Actigraph) and oxygen-consumption assessment. Results revealed strong linear relations between ACC output and measured PAI (R2 = .62-.89) across age and similar ACC cut-point ranges across age delineating absolute PAI ranges compared with previous findings. Comparing measured metabolic equivalents (METs) with estimated METs derived from previously published regression equations revealed that age did not affect predictive validity of ACC estimates of absolute PAI. Comparing ACC output expressed in relative vs. absolute terms across age revealed substantial differences in PAI ACC count ranges. Further work is warranted to increase the applicability ofACC use relative to PAI differences associated with physiological changes with age.
本研究考察了加速度计(ACC)在不同年龄阶段估计身体活动强度(PAI)的预测效度,以及以相对和绝对PAI表示时强度预测的差异。90名成年人被分为3个年龄组(20 - 29岁、40 - 49岁和60 - 69岁),他们完成了一项跑步机校准研究,同时进行ACC(7164 Actigraph)测量和耗氧量评估。结果显示,在不同年龄阶段,ACC输出与测量的PAI之间存在强线性关系(R2 = 0.62 - 0.89),并且与之前的研究结果相比,不同年龄阶段划分绝对PAI范围的ACC切点范围相似。将测量的代谢当量(METs)与根据先前发表的回归方程得出的估计METs进行比较,结果表明年龄并不影响ACC对绝对PAI估计的预测效度。比较不同年龄阶段以相对和绝对形式表示的ACC输出,发现PAI的ACC计数范围存在显著差异。有必要进一步开展工作,以提高ACC在与年龄相关的生理变化所导致的PAI差异方面的适用性。