Programa de Pós-graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rua Marechal Deodoro, Pelotas, RS-Brazil, Brazil.
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jul;42(4):1025-30. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.009. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
In 2006, we carried out a cross-sectional study in the urban area of Pelotas, Southern Brazil, with the aim of outlining the profile of bicycle commuters, analyzing their use of safety equipment and risk behaviors and the association between these variables and involvement in traffic accidents in the previous 12 months. This study was based on the baseline survey carried out prior to an educational intervention aimed at reducing accidents among cyclists. The sample included 1133 male subjects aged 20 years or more, and who used a bicycle for commuting. Crude and adjusted analyses were carried out using Poisson regression. We recorded a total of 152 reported traffic accidents in the 12 months preceding the interview, involving 10.8% of subjects. Most risk behaviors studied and the use of safety equipment showed no significant association with accidents. Only commuting by bicycle seven days per week, as opposed to five or six, and a combination of extremely imprudent behaviors such as zigzagging through traffic, riding after ingesting alcohol, and high-speed riding were found to be risk factors for accidents. Our findings suggest that in the context where the study was done (poor road signaling, limited policing, aggressive driving) changing cyclist behavior may not have substantial impact in terms of accident reduction before other road traffic interventions are implemented.
2006 年,我们在巴西南部城市佩洛塔斯进行了一项横断面研究,旨在概述自行车通勤者的特征,分析他们使用安全设备和危险行为的情况,并探讨这些变量与过去 12 个月内交通事故之间的关系。这项研究是基于一项教育干预措施之前进行的基线调查,该干预措施旨在减少自行车事故。该样本包括 1133 名年龄在 20 岁及以上、骑自行车上班的男性。使用泊松回归进行了粗分析和调整分析。在接受采访前的 12 个月内,共记录了 152 起报告的交通事故,涉及 10.8%的参与者。研究中大多数危险行为和安全设备的使用与事故均无显著关联。只有每周骑自行车通勤 7 天,而不是 5 天或 6 天,以及同时存在极度鲁莽的行为(如在车流中曲折骑行、酒后骑行和高速骑行),才被认为是事故的危险因素。我们的研究结果表明,在所研究的背景下(道路信号差、警力有限、驾驶行为激进),在实施其他道路交通干预措施之前,改变自行车骑行者的行为可能不会对减少事故产生实质性影响。