Augner Christoph, Hacker Gerhard W
IGGMB-Research Institute for Frontier Questions of Medicine and Biotechnology, Salzburg Federal Hospital-University Clinics of the Paracelsus Private Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2009 Dec;13(3):141-5. doi: 10.4103/0019-5278.58918.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Coeval with the expansion of mobile phone technology and the associated obvious presence of mobile phone base stations, some people living close to these masts reported symptoms they attributed to electromagnetic fields (EMF). Public and scientific discussions arose with regard to whether these symptoms were due to EMF or were nocebo effects. The aim of this study was to find out if people who believe that they live close to base stations show psychological or psychobiological differences that would indicate more strain or stress. Furthermore, we wanted to detect the relevant connections linking self-estimated distance between home and the next mobile phone base station (DBS), daily use of mobile phone (MPU), EMF-health concerns, electromagnetic hypersensitivity, and psychological strain parameters. DESIGN, MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven participants completed standardized and non-standardized questionnaires that focused on the relevant parameters. In addition, saliva samples were used as an indication to determine the psychobiological strain by concentration of alpha-amylase, cortisol, immunoglobulin A (IgA), and substance P. RESULTS: Self-declared base station neighbors (DBS </= 100 meters) had significantly higher concentrations of alpha-amylase in their saliva, higher rates in symptom checklist subscales (SCL) somatization, obsessive-compulsive, anxiety, phobic anxiety, and global strain index PST (Positive Symptom Total). There were no differences in EMF-related health concern scales. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that self-declared base station neighbors are more strained than others. EMF-related health concerns cannot explain these findings. Further research should identify if actual EMF exposure or other factors are responsible for these results.
背景与目的:随着移动电话技术的发展以及移动电话基站的明显增多,一些居住在这些基站附近的人报告了他们认为归因于电磁场(EMF)的症状。关于这些症状是由电磁场引起还是由反安慰剂效应导致,引发了公众和科学界的讨论。本研究的目的是查明那些认为自己居住在基站附近的人是否存在心理或心理生物学差异,这些差异可能表明他们承受了更多的压力或紧张。此外,我们希望检测出将自我估计的家与下一个移动电话基站之间的距离(DBS)、移动电话的日常使用情况(MPU)、对电磁场与健康的担忧、电磁超敏反应以及心理压力参数联系起来的相关关联。 设计、材料与方法:57名参与者完成了聚焦于相关参数的标准化和非标准化问卷。此外,采集唾液样本,通过检测α-淀粉酶、皮质醇、免疫球蛋白A(IgA)和P物质的浓度来确定心理生物学压力状况。 结果:自称居住在基站附近(DBS≤100米)的人唾液中α-淀粉酶浓度显著更高,在症状清单分量表(SCL)的躯体化、强迫观念与强迫行为、焦虑、恐惧性焦虑以及总体压力指数PST(阳性症状总数)方面的得分也更高。在与电磁场相关的健康担忧量表方面没有差异。 结论:我们得出结论,自称居住在基站附近的人比其他人承受的压力更大。与电磁场相关的健康担忧无法解释这些发现。进一步的研究应确定是实际的电磁场暴露还是其他因素导致了这些结果。
Risk Anal. 2005-10
Environ Res. 2019-5-21
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018-10-9
Am J Mens Health. 2018-12-7
J Diabetes Res. 2015
Int J Public Health. 2011-2-3
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009-5
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009-5
Bioelectromagnetics. 2009-1
J Psychosom Res. 2008-1
Neurotoxicology. 2007-3