a Departments of Medical Sciences and Public Health.
c EPICOOP, Cagliari, Italy.
Radiat Res. 2018 May;189(5):541-547. doi: 10.1667/RR14952.1. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
We investigated the association between environmental exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) and risk of lymphoma subtypes in a case-control study comprised of 322 patients and 444 individuals serving as controls in Sardinia, Italy in 1998-2004. Questionnaire information included the self-reported distance of the three longest held residential addresses from fixed radio-television transmitters and mobile phone base stations. We georeferenced the residential addresses of all study subjects and obtained the spatial coordinates of mobile phone base stations. For each address within a 500-meter radius from a mobile phone base station, we estimated the RF-EMF intensity using predictions from spatial models, and we performed RF-EMF measurements at the door in the subset of the longest held addresses within a 250-meter radius. We calculated risk of lymphoma and its major subtypes associated with the RF-EMF exposure metrics with unconditional logistic regression, adjusting by age, gender and years of education. In the analysis of self-reported data, risk associated with residence in proximity (within 50 meters) to fixed radio-television transmitters was likewise elevated for lymphoma overall [odds ratio = 2.7, 95% confidence interval = 1.5-4.6], and for the major lymphoma subtypes. With reference to mobile phone base stations, we did not observe an association with either the self-reported, or the geocoded distance from mobile phone base stations. RF-EMF measurements did not vary by case-control status. By comparing the self-reports to the geocoded data, we discovered that the cases tended to underestimate the distance from mobile phone base stations differentially from the controls ( P = 0.073). The interpretation of our findings is compromised by the limited study size, particularly in the analysis of the individual lymphoma subtypes, and the unavailability of the spatial coordinates of radio-television transmitters. Nonetheless, our results do not support the hypothesis of a link between environmental exposure to RF-EMF from mobile phone base stations and risk of lymphoma subtypes.
我们在意大利撒丁岛进行了一项病例对照研究,共纳入 322 名患者和 444 名对照,研究于 1998 年至 2004 年进行。问卷调查信息包括报告的三个最长居住地址与固定广播电视发射台和移动电话基站的距离。我们对所有研究对象的居住地址进行地理定位,并获得了移动电话基站的空间坐标。对于距离移动电话基站 500 米范围内的每个地址,我们使用空间模型预测的结果来估算射频电磁辐射强度,并在最长居住地址 250 米范围内的地址子集处进行射频电磁辐射测量。我们使用非条件逻辑回归计算与射频电磁辐射暴露指标相关的淋巴瘤及其主要亚型的风险,并根据年龄、性别和受教育年限进行调整。在对自我报告数据的分析中,与固定广播电视发射台近距离(50 米以内)居住相关的淋巴瘤整体风险也升高[比值比=2.7,95%置信区间=1.5-4.6],且与主要淋巴瘤亚型相关。关于移动电话基站,我们未观察到自我报告的或从移动电话基站的地理编码距离与任何结果相关。射频电磁辐射测量值与病例对照状态无关。通过将自我报告与地理编码数据进行比较,我们发现病例组倾向于从移动电话基站低估距离,与对照组存在差异(P=0.073)。由于研究规模有限,特别是在分析各个淋巴瘤亚型时,以及缺乏广播电视发射台的空间坐标,我们的研究结果受到限制。尽管如此,我们的结果并不支持环境暴露于移动电话基站射频电磁辐射与淋巴瘤亚型风险之间存在关联的假设。