• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

照顾者的协议和间接功能分析的有效性:多种问题行为形态的跨文化评估。

Caregivers' agreement and validity of indirect functional analysis: a cross cultural evaluation across multiple problem behavior topographies.

机构信息

ABA España, Apto. 44068, 28029, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Autism Dev Disord. 2011 Jan;41(1):82-91. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1022-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10803-010-1022-y
PMID:20443134
Abstract

The Motivation Assessment Scale is an aid for hypothesis-driven functional analysis. This study presents its Spanish cross-cultural validation while examining psychometric attributes not yet explored. The study sample comprised 80 primary caregivers of children with autism. Acceptability, scaling assumptions, internal consistency, factor structure, inter-assessor reliability and agreement, and known-group validity analyses were performed. Scaling assumptions, internal consistency (Cronbach alpha of 0.75) and factor structure were satisfactory other than for the Escape domain which demonstrated low internal consistency (0.65), inadequate scaling assumptions (multitrait analysis, 50% success rate) and did not constitute a separate factor. Caregivers' agreement for the primary function reached 73.9% and known group-validity hypotheses across behavior topographies were partially met. The clinical appropriateness of the scale is discussed.

摘要

动机评估量表是一种有助于假设驱动的功能分析的工具。本研究介绍了其西班牙语跨文化验证,同时检验了尚未探索的心理测量属性。研究样本包括 80 名自闭症儿童的主要照顾者。进行了可接受性、刻度假设、内部一致性、因子结构、评估者间信度和一致性以及已知组有效性分析。除了逃避维度外,刻度假设、内部一致性(Cronbach alpha 为 0.75)和因子结构均令人满意,逃避维度的内部一致性较低(0.65),刻度假设不充分(多特质分析,成功率为 50%),且不能构成单独的因子。主要功能的照顾者一致性达到 73.9%,行为形态的已知组有效性假设得到部分满足。讨论了该量表的临床适宜性。

相似文献

1
Caregivers' agreement and validity of indirect functional analysis: a cross cultural evaluation across multiple problem behavior topographies.照顾者的协议和间接功能分析的有效性:多种问题行为形态的跨文化评估。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2011 Jan;41(1):82-91. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1022-y.
2
Parental-Caregivers Perceptions Questionnaire (P-CPQ): translation and evaluation of psychometric properties of the French version of the questionnaire.父母照顾者感知问卷 (P-CPQ):问卷法的法文版的心理计量特性的翻译和评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Dec 11;18(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0670-8.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire in French.跨文化调适与修订后患者对减药态度问卷(rPATD)法语版的心理测量学验证。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Aug;17(8):1453-1462. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Child Adjustment and Parent Efficacy Scale-Developmental Disability (CAPES-DD): First psychometric evaluation of a new child and parenting assessment tool for children with a developmental disability.儿童适应与家长效能感量表-发育障碍版(CAPES-DD):一种针对发育障碍儿童的新型儿童及家长评估工具的首次心理测量学评估。
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Jun-Jul;53-54:158-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.09.006. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
5
Psychometric evaluation and cultural adaptation of the Spanish version of the "Scale for End-of Life Caregiving Appraisal".《生命终末期照护评估量表》西班牙语版的心理测量学评估和文化适应性研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2019 Jun;17(3):314-321. doi: 10.1017/S1478951518000470. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
6
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Experience of Caregiving Inventory (ECI) among caregivers of individuals with an eating disorder.西班牙语版体验式照护者量表(ECI)在照护进食障碍患者的照护者中的心理测量学特性。
Eat Weight Disord. 2020 Apr;25(2):299-307. doi: 10.1007/s40519-018-0587-x. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
7
Spanish Adaptation of the Pediatric Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale for Children, Teens, and Caregivers.儿科生存质量测定量表中文版的制定及其临床试用
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Jun;61(6):1165-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.022. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
8
Quality of life in caregivers of children with asthma: Validity and reliability of the IFABI-R questionnaire.哮喘患儿照料者的生活质量:IFABI-R问卷的效度和信度
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2016 Mar-Apr;44(2):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
9
Assessment of Autistic Traits in Children Aged 2 to 4½ Years With the Preschool Version of the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-P): Findings from Japan.使用社会反应量表学前版(SRS-P)对2至4.5岁儿童自闭症特征的评估:来自日本的研究结果。
Autism Res. 2017 May;10(5):852-865. doi: 10.1002/aur.1742. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
10
The measurement scale of resilience among family caregivers of children with cancer: a psychometric evaluation.癌症患儿家庭照顾者韧性测量量表:心理测量学评估。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 27;19(1):1164. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7512-8.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative effectiveness trial of functional behavioral assessment methods.功能性行为评估方法的比较效果试验。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2024 Jan;57(1):166-183. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1045. Epub 2023 Dec 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical application of functional analysis methodology.功能分析方法的临床应用
Behav Anal Pract. 2008 Spring;1(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03391714.
2
Brief report: a comparison of indirect versus experimental strategies for the assessment of pica.简要报告:评估异食癖的间接策略与实验策略的比较。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Nov;39(11):1582-6. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0766-8. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
3
The motivation of stereotypic and repetitive behavior: examination of construct validity of the motivation assessment scale.刻板重复行为的动机:动机评估量表的结构效度检验
J Autism Dev Disord. 2008 Aug;38(7):1341-8. doi: 10.1007/s10803-007-0523-9. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
4
A comparison of outcomes from descriptive and functional analyses of problem behavior.问题行为的描述性分析与功能性分析结果的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Summer;40(2):333-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.56-06.
5
Psychometric properties of the Questions About Behavioral Function scale in a child sample.儿童样本中行为功能问题量表的心理测量特性。
Am J Ment Retard. 2007 Mar;112(2):122-9. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2007)112[122:PPOTQA]2.0.CO;2.
6
Comparing functional assessment methodologies: a quantitative synthesis.比较功能评估方法:一项定量综合分析。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 Sep;37(8):1430-45. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0219-6.
7
FACTOR: a computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model.FACTOR:一个用于拟合探索性因子分析模型的计算机程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2006 Feb;38(1):88-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03192753.
8
Progressing from brief assessments to extended experimental analyses in the evaluation of aberrant behavior.从简要评估到扩展实验分析评估异常行为。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Winter;28(4):561-76. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-561.
9
Epidemiology of autistic disorder and other pervasive developmental disorders.孤独症谱系障碍及其他广泛性发育障碍的流行病学
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66 Suppl 10:3-8.
10
Comparing descriptive, experimental and informant-based assessments of problem behaviors.比较问题行为的描述性、实验性和基于信息提供者的评估。
Res Dev Disabil. 2005 Nov-Dec;26(6):514-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.004.