• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

问题行为的描述性分析与功能性分析结果的比较。

A comparison of outcomes from descriptive and functional analyses of problem behavior.

作者信息

Thompson Rachel H, Iwata Brian A

机构信息

Department of Applied Behavioral Science, 1000 Sunnyside Ave., Room 4001, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Summer;40(2):333-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.56-06.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.2007.56-06
PMID:17624074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1885418/
Abstract

We compared results of descriptive and functional analyses of problem behavior for 12 participants whose descriptive data have been reported previously (Thompson & Iwata, 2001). Results indicated that in only 3 of the 12 cases was problem behavior maintained by the consequence observed most frequently during the descriptive analysis. Attention was the most common consequence for problem behavior during descriptive analyses for 8 of the 12 participants; however, maintenance of problem behavior by attention was evident for only 2 of these 8 participants.

摘要

我们比较了12名参与者问题行为的描述性分析和功能性分析结果,这些参与者的描述性数据先前已有报道(汤普森和岩田,2001年)。结果表明,在这12个案例中,只有3例问题行为是由描述性分析期间最常观察到的后果维持的。在12名参与者中的8人的描述性分析中,注意力是问题行为最常见的后果;然而,在这8名参与者中,只有2人问题行为由注意力维持的情况明显。

相似文献

1
A comparison of outcomes from descriptive and functional analyses of problem behavior.问题行为的描述性分析与功能性分析结果的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Summer;40(2):333-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.56-06.
2
A descriptive analysis of social consequences following problem behavior.对问题行为后社会后果的描述性分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Summer;34(2):169-78. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-169.
3
The purported association between depression, aggression, and self-injury in people with intellectual disability: a critical review of the literature.智力障碍者中抑郁症、攻击性和自我伤害之间的所谓关联:文献综述
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014 Sep;119(5):452-71. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-119.5.452.
4
The behavioural phenotype of Smith-Magenis syndrome: evidence for a gene-environment interaction.史密斯-马吉尼斯综合征的行为表型:基因-环境相互作用的证据。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008 Oct;52(10):830-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01066.x. Epub 2008 May 5.
5
Self-injury, aggression and destruction in children with severe intellectual disability: Incidence, persistence and novel, predictive behavioural risk markers.重度智力残疾儿童的自我伤害、攻击和破坏行为:发生率、持续性及新的预测性行为风险标志物
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Feb-Mar;49-50:291-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
6
The Behavior Problems Inventory-Short Form for individuals with intellectual disabilities: part I: development and provisional clinical reference data.《智障人士行为问题清单-简表》:第一部分:编制及临时临床参考数据。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 May;56(5):527-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01507.x. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
7
Self-injurious, aggressive and destructive behaviour in children with severe intellectual disability: Prevalence, service need and service receipt in the UK.重度智力残疾儿童的自伤、攻击和破坏行为:英国的患病率、服务需求与服务接受情况
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Oct-Nov;45-46:307-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
8
Multiple-respondent anecdotal assessments: an analysis of interrater agreement and correspondence with analogue assessment outcomes.多受访者轶事评估:评分者间一致性分析及与模拟评估结果的一致性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter;45(4):779-95. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-779.
9
Persistence of self-injury, aggression and property destruction in children and adults with tuberous sclerosis complex.结节性硬化症患儿和成年患者的自伤、攻击和破坏财产行为的持续存在。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Dec;62(12):1058-1071. doi: 10.1111/jir.12472. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
10
Behavioral approaches to managing severe problem behaviors in children with autism spectrum and related developmental disorders: a descriptive analysis.管理自闭症谱系及相关发育障碍儿童严重问题行为的行为方法:描述性分析
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2014 Jan;23(1):25-40. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Pilot study of a real-time early agitation capture technology (REACT) for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities.针对智力和发育障碍儿童的实时早期躁动捕捉技术(REACT)的初步研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 14;10:20552076241287884. doi: 10.1177/20552076241287884. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Impact of a Training Package to Improve the Effectiveness of Descriptive Assessment Data.提高描述性评估数据有效性的培训包的影响
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 May 25;16(1):232-250. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00717-5. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Owner-Implemented Functional Analyses and Reinforcement-Based Treatments for Mouthing in Dogs.狗啃咬行为的主人实施功能分析及基于强化的治疗方法
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 6;15(1):269-283. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00554-y. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
An Initial Evaluation of an Assessment Method for the PEAK Relational System Direct Training Module.PEAK关系系统直接训练模块评估方法的初步评估
Behav Anal Pract. 2019 Oct 18;13(1):126-136. doi: 10.1007/s40617-019-00387-w. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
Agreement Between Structured Descriptive Assessments and Functional Analyses Conducted Over a Telehealth System.通过远程医疗系统进行的结构化描述性评估与功能分析之间的一致性
Behav Anal (Wash D C). 2019 Nov;19(4):343-356. doi: 10.1037/bar0000153. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
6
A translational evaluation of potential iatrogenic effects of single and combined contingencies during functional analysis.功能分析中单种和多种强化物对医源性影响的转化评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jan;53(1):67-81. doi: 10.1002/jaba.595. Epub 2019 Jul 7.
7
Comparisons of standardized and interview-informed synthesized reinforcement contingencies relative to functional analysis.相对于功能分析的标准化和基于访谈的综合强化偶联的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jan;53(1):82-101. doi: 10.1002/jaba.601. Epub 2019 Jul 7.
8
Assessing and Treating Elopement in a School Setting.在学校环境中评估和处理学生擅自离校行为
Teach Except Child. 2018 Jul;50(6):333-342. doi: 10.1177/0040059918770663. Epub 2018 May 15.
9
Reliability and Validity of Indirect Assessment Outcomes: Experts versus Caregivers.间接评估结果的信度与效度:专家与照料者的比较
Learn Motiv. 2018 May;62:77-90. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
10
Treatment of severe problem behaviour in children with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disabilities.治疗自闭症谱系障碍和智力残疾儿童的严重问题行为。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;30(1):96-109. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2018.1435513. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
On the role of attention in naturally occurring matching relations.论注意力在自然发生的匹配关系中的作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Winter;38(4):429-43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.172-04.
2
Comparing descriptive, experimental and informant-based assessments of problem behaviors.比较问题行为的描述性、实验性和基于信息提供者的评估。
Res Dev Disabil. 2005 Nov-Dec;26(6):514-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.004.
3
A descriptive analysis of potential reinforcement contingencies in the preschool classroom.对学前课堂中潜在强化偶发事件的描述性分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2004 Winter;37(4):431-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2004.37-431.
4
Functional analysis of inappropriate mealtime behaviors.非适宜进餐时间行为的功能分析
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Summer;36(2):187-204. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-187.
5
A descriptive analysis of social consequences following problem behavior.对问题行为后社会后果的描述性分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Summer;34(2):169-78. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-169.
6
A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules.一种在非偶然性强化程序下识别饱腹感与消退效应的方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Winter;33(4):419-32. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-419.
7
Differential responding in the presence and absence of discriminative stimuli during multielement functional analyses.在多元素功能分析过程中,在有和没有辨别性刺激的情况下的差异反应。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):299-308. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-299.
8
Effects of continuous and intermittent reinforcement for problem behavior during functional communication training.功能性沟通训练期间持续强化与间歇强化对问题行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Summer;33(2):167-79. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-167.
9
False-positive maintenance of self-injurious behavior by access to tangible reinforcers.通过获得有形强化物对自伤行为进行假阳性维持。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Summer;32(2):201-4. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-201.
10
Survey of functional assessment procedures used with individuals who display mental retardation and severe problem behaviors.针对表现出智力迟钝和严重问题行为的个体所使用的功能评估程序的调查。
Am J Ment Retard. 1997 Mar;101(5):535-46.