Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010 Dec;21(8):1119-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2010.01043.x.
Oral peanut food challenges (OPFC) are the 'gold standard' for diagnosing peanut allergy in children. However, there are few data on parental perception of such challenges. We aimed to investigate the parental experience of and satisfaction with OPFC and reported dietary management of children with a history of peanut allergy following OPFC. Telephone interviews were conducted with parents of children who had undergone an open-label OPFC at a specialist paediatric allergy centre. Forty-six of 76 eligible parents participated. Of those parents, 54% were very satisfied with the OPFC. The highest levels of satisfaction were reported in relation to (i) clarification of the severity of the child's peanut allergy (ii) the support provided by staff and (iii) determining the child was tolerant of peanut or assessed to be at low risk of anaphylaxis from accidental peanut exposure. When the outcome of the challenge was perceived to be equivocal, levels of parental satisfaction were lower. Other areas of dissatisfaction included difficulties inducing peanut ingestion, parental distress at seeing their child unwell and perception of inadequate follow-up. Ninety-four per cent of parents could not remember the amount of peanut ingested, and 24% could not remember whether management advice was given after the OPFC or reported that none was given. Reported compliance with recalled advice to avoid peanut was found in all cases but one, whilst recalled advice to reintroduce peanuts following a negative challenge was followed in 5/9 cases. Although 12 parents reported that their child had an allergic reaction caused by accidental exposure to peanut since the OPFC, only four were certain peanut was the cause. Comprehensive education, counselling and follow-up subsequent to an OPFC are required. Parents of children whose challenge outcome is inconclusive should be targeted for support.
口服花生食物挑战(OPFC)是诊断儿童花生过敏的“金标准”。然而,关于父母对这种挑战的看法的数据很少。我们旨在调查父母对 OPFC 的体验和满意度,并报告 OPFC 后有花生过敏史的儿童的饮食管理情况。我们对在一家儿科过敏中心进行开放性 OPFC 的儿童的父母进行了电话采访。76 名符合条件的父母中有 46 名参加了采访。在这些父母中,有 54%对 OPFC 非常满意。满意度最高的是(i)澄清孩子花生过敏的严重程度;(ii)工作人员提供的支持;(iii)确定孩子耐受花生或评估其因意外花生暴露而发生过敏反应的风险低。当挑战的结果被认为是不确定时,父母的满意度较低。其他不满的领域包括难以诱导孩子摄入花生、看到孩子不适时父母的痛苦以及认为随访不足。94%的父母不记得摄入了多少花生,24%的父母不记得 OPFC 后是否给予了管理建议或报告没有给予任何建议。在所有情况下都发现了对避免食用花生的回忆性建议的遵守,但在 5/9 的情况下,对在阴性挑战后重新引入花生的回忆性建议进行了遵守。尽管有 12 位父母报告说他们的孩子在 OPFC 后因意外接触花生而发生过敏反应,但只有 4 位父母确定花生是原因。OPFC 后需要进行全面的教育、咨询和随访。对于挑战结果不确定的儿童的父母应提供支持。