Yang Xiaoke
Pfizer Biotherapeutic Research and Development, Inflammation and Immunology, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA.
J Biomol Screen. 2010 Jun;15(5):556-61. doi: 10.1177/1087057110369259. Epub 2010 May 6.
Most assays used to monitor enzymatic activities can be considered detection-coupled assays (i.e., indirect measurement of an analyte by using another chemical reaction for detection). The major reason for this is that the analyte that indicates the activity of the reaction cannot be directly measured or specifically directly measured by conventional means, such as optical density, fluorescence, and so on. By coupling another reaction to the enzymatic reaction of interest, the activity of the reaction can be monitored without modification to the analyte itself. However, due to the additional coupling reaction between the analyte and the detection reagents, the dynamic range of the assay could be greatly limited by the coupling reaction, and the apparent parameters of the enzymatic reaction could be much different from its uncoupled counterpart, causing significant deviations for IC(50) measurement for an inhibition reaction of the enzyme. By using exact solutions for both the enzymatic and the coupling reactions, the effects of the coupling reaction on the dynamic range and accuracy of the IC(50) measurement are reviewed and evaluated. In addition, real examples are provided to further illustrate the problem and validate the analysis.
大多数用于监测酶活性的测定方法都可被视为检测偶联测定法(即通过使用另一种化学反应进行检测来间接测量分析物)。主要原因在于,指示反应活性的分析物无法通过常规手段(如光密度、荧光等)直接测量或特异性地直接测量。通过将另一个反应与感兴趣的酶促反应偶联,可以在不改变分析物本身的情况下监测反应活性。然而,由于分析物与检测试剂之间存在额外的偶联反应,测定的动态范围可能会受到偶联反应的极大限制,并且酶促反应的表观参数可能与其未偶联的对应物有很大不同,这会导致酶抑制反应的IC(50)测量出现显著偏差。通过使用酶促反应和偶联反应的精确解,对偶联反应对IC(50)测量的动态范围和准确性的影响进行了综述和评估。此外,还提供了实际例子以进一步说明问题并验证分析。