• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从临床数据中学习个体化预测模型。

Learning patient-specific predictive models from clinical data.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2010 Oct;43(5):669-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 May 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2010.04.009
PMID:20450985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2933959/
Abstract

We introduce an algorithm for learning patient-specific models from clinical data to predict outcomes. Patient-specific models are influenced by the particular history, symptoms, laboratory results, and other features of the patient case at hand, in contrast to the commonly used population-wide models that are constructed to perform well on average on all future cases. The patient-specific algorithm uses Markov blanket (MB) models, carries out Bayesian model averaging over a set of models to predict the outcome for the patient case at hand, and employs a patient-specific heuristic to locate a set of suitable models to average over. We evaluate the utility of using a local structure representation for the conditional probability distributions in the MB models that captures additional independence relations among the variables compared to the typically used representation that captures only the global structure among the variables. In addition, we compare the performance of Bayesian model averaging to that of model selection. The patient-specific algorithm and its variants were evaluated on two clinical datasets for two outcomes. Our results provide support that the performance of an algorithm for learning patient-specific models can be improved by using a local structure representation for MB models and by performing Bayesian model averaging.

摘要

我们介绍了一种从临床数据中学习患者特异性模型以预测结果的算法。与通常用于构建的旨在平均提高所有未来病例性能的人群范围模型相比,患者特异性模型受到手头患者病例的特定病史、症状、实验室结果和其他特征的影响。患者特异性算法使用马尔可夫毯(MB)模型,对一组模型进行贝叶斯模型平均以预测手头患者病例的结果,并采用患者特异性启发式方法找到一组适合进行平均的模型。我们评估了在 MB 模型中使用局部结构表示条件概率分布的效用,与通常仅捕获变量之间全局结构的表示相比,该表示捕获了变量之间的额外独立性关系。此外,我们比较了贝叶斯模型平均与模型选择的性能。我们在两个临床数据集上针对两个结果评估了患者特异性算法及其变体。我们的结果提供了支持,即通过使用 MB 模型的局部结构表示和执行贝叶斯模型平均,可以提高学习患者特异性模型的算法的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/4e999f5d3c91/nihms203831f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/d0b2a63a6b7a/nihms203831f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/c7d66cd67d20/nihms203831f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/6bab53bb79d9/nihms203831f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/affad02340dc/nihms203831f4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/f05ef296d5fc/nihms203831f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/6bce1218a8bd/nihms203831f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/5b4661ce453c/nihms203831f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/4e999f5d3c91/nihms203831f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/d0b2a63a6b7a/nihms203831f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/c7d66cd67d20/nihms203831f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/6bab53bb79d9/nihms203831f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/affad02340dc/nihms203831f4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/f05ef296d5fc/nihms203831f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/6bce1218a8bd/nihms203831f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/5b4661ce453c/nihms203831f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1a/2933959/4e999f5d3c91/nihms203831f8.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning patient-specific predictive models from clinical data.从临床数据中学习个体化预测模型。
J Biomed Inform. 2010 Oct;43(5):669-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 May 5.
2
Learning Instance-Specific Predictive Models.学习特定实例的预测模型。
J Mach Learn Res. 2010 Dec 1;11:3333-3369.
3
Unsupervised Bayesian Inference to Fuse Biosignal Sensory Estimates for Personalizing Care.无监督贝叶斯推断融合生物信号传感器估计值以实现个性化护理。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2019 Jan;23(1):47-58. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2018.2820054. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
4
Analysis for warning factors of type 2 diabetes mellitus complications with Markov blanket based on a Bayesian network model.基于贝叶斯网络模型的 Markov blankets 分析 2 型糖尿病并发症的预警因素。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 May;188:105302. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105302. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
5
Mutual information preconditioning improves structure learning of Bayesian networks from medical databases.互信息预处理可改善从医学数据库中学习贝叶斯网络的结构。
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2009 Nov;13(6):984-9. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2009.2026273. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
6
A hybrid random field model for scalable statistical learning.一种用于可扩展统计学习的混合随机场模型。
Neural Netw. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(5-6):603-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.06.017. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
7
Machine learning for biomedical literature triage.用于生物医学文献分类的机器学习
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 31;9(12):e115892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115892. eCollection 2014.
8
HPO2Vec+: Leveraging heterogeneous knowledge resources to enrich node embeddings for the Human Phenotype Ontology.HPO2Vec+:利用异构知识资源丰富人类表型本体的节点嵌入。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Aug;96:103246. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103246. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
9
An algorithm for direct causal learning of influences on patient outcomes.一种用于直接因果学习对患者预后影响的算法。
Artif Intell Med. 2017 Jan;75:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
10
Incorporating repeating temporal association rules in Naïve Bayes classifiers for coronary heart disease diagnosis.将重复时间关联规则纳入朴素贝叶斯分类器以进行冠心病诊断。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 May;81:74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Algorithmic individual fairness and healthcare: a scoping review.算法个体公平性与医疗保健:一项范围综述
JAMIA Open. 2024 Dec 30;8(1):ooae149. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae149. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Algorithmic Individual Fairness and Healthcare: A Scoping Review.算法个体公平性与医疗保健:一项范围综述
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 26:2024.03.25.24304853. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.25.24304853.
3
Development and Validation of a Personalized Model With Transfer Learning for Acute Kidney Injury Risk Estimation Using Electronic Health Records.基于电子健康记录的应用迁移学习构建急性肾损伤风险预测个体化模型的建立与验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2219776. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.19776.
4
Patient-Specific Modeling with Personalized Decision Paths.基于个体化决策路径的患者特异性建模。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:602-611. eCollection 2020.
5
Systematic discovery of the functional impact of somatic genome alterations in individual tumors through tumor-specific causal inference.通过肿瘤特异性因果推断,在个体肿瘤中系统地发现体细胞基因组改变的功能影响。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Jul 5;15(7):e1007088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007088. eCollection 2019 Jul.
6
Privacy-Preserving Patient Similarity Learning in a Federated Environment: Development and Analysis.联邦环境下的隐私保护患者相似度学习:开发与分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Apr 13;6(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/medinform.7744.
7
Simultaneous Force Regression and Movement Classification of Fingers Surface EMG within a Unified Bayesian Framework.统一贝叶斯框架下手指表面肌电图的同步力回归与运动分类
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018 Feb 26;6:13. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00013. eCollection 2018.
8
A review of recent advances in data analytics for post-operative patient deterioration detection.术后患者病情恶化检测的数据分析最新进展综述。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Jun;32(3):391-402. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0054-7. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
9
Personalized Predictive Modeling and Risk Factor Identification using Patient Similarity.利用患者相似性进行个性化预测建模和风险因素识别。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2015 Mar 25;2015:132-6. eCollection 2015.
10
Personalized Modeling for Prediction with Decision-Path Models.使用决策路径模型进行预测的个性化建模
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 22;10(6):e0131022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131022. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting dire outcomes of patients with community acquired pneumonia.预测社区获得性肺炎患者的严重后果。
J Biomed Inform. 2005 Oct;38(5):347-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.005. Epub 2005 Mar 17.
2
A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with heart failure.一种用于识别心力衰竭低风险患者的预测规则。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jun;12(6):514-21. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.11.026.
3
Prognostic models in medicine. AI and statistical approaches.
Methods Inf Med. 2001 Mar;40(1):1-5.
4
Treating patients with severe sepsis.治疗重症脓毒症患者。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 21;340(3):207-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901213400307.
5
An evaluation of machine-learning methods for predicting pneumonia mortality.
Artif Intell Med. 1997 Feb;9(2):107-38. doi: 10.1016/s0933-3657(96)00367-3.
6
From the Centers for Disease Control. Increase in National Hospital Discharge Survey rates for septicemia--United States, 1979-1987.来自疾病控制中心。1979 - 1987年美国全国医院出院调查中败血症发病率的上升。
JAMA. 1990 Feb 16;263(7):937-8.