• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[居家医院(HaH)对不同严重程度社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的治疗效果]

[Efficacy of hospital at home (HaH) in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) with different degrees of severity].

作者信息

Regalado de Los Cobos José, Aizpuru Barandiaran Felipe, Oceja Barrutieta Esther, de Juan Rodríguez María, Apraiz Ruiz Leire, Altuna Basurto Elena, Gomez Rodríguez de Mendarozqueta Montserrat, López-Picado Amanda, Cia Ruiz Juan Miguel

机构信息

Unidad de Hospitalización a Domicilio de Vitoria-Gasteiz, Hospital Txagorritxu y Hospital Santiago Apóstol, Vitoria-Gasteiz, España.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Jun 12;135(2):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2009.12.021. Epub 2010 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.medcli.2009.12.021
PMID:20451224
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Different scientific societies propose the use of scales of severity and additional criteria (AC) in order to determine the setting for the treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP).The objective of this study is to correlate the risk regarding three clinical prediction rules (PSI, CURB-65 and PSCRUXO-80) and AC with the effectiveness of hospital at home (HaH).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Evaluation of cases of CAP referred from the Emergency Unit to HaH between January 2000 and May 2008. They were classified regarding three risk scales and presence of AC and its association with the effectiveness of HaH during the treatment was analysed.

RESULTS

146 women and 181 men were admitted, (mean age, 60.3 years). The average stay in HaH was 8.6 days. Two patients died, 25 (7.7%) were admitted to hospital, 219 progressed favourably throughout and 81 after overcoming complications. Hospital at Home was effective in 92.3% of total patients. The rate was 85% for those in PSI=IV or V with or without additional criteria; 80% for CURB-65=2 and 77.5% for a PSCURXO-80 score of 10-19. The effectiveness of HaH is inversely related to severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital a Home (HaD) is an effective and safe care option for many cases of CAP in which hospital admission is normally recommended on the basis of prediction rule scores or additional admission criteria.

摘要

背景与目的

不同科学协会建议使用严重程度量表和附加标准(AC)来确定社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的治疗环境。本研究的目的是将三种临床预测规则(PSI、CURB - 65和PSCRUXO - 80)及附加标准相关的风险与家庭医院治疗(HaH)的有效性进行关联。

患者与方法

对2000年1月至2008年5月从急诊科转诊至家庭医院治疗的CAP病例进行评估。根据三种风险量表及附加标准的存在情况对病例进行分类,并分析其与家庭医院治疗期间有效性的关联。

结果

共收治146名女性和181名男性患者(平均年龄60.3岁)。在家庭医院的平均住院时间为8.6天。2例患者死亡,25例(7.7%)入院治疗,219例病情顺利进展,81例在克服并发症后康复。家庭医院治疗对92.3%的患者有效。PSI = IV或V级(无论有无附加标准)患者的有效率为85%;CURB - 65 = 2分的患者有效率为80%;PSCURXO - 80评分为10 - 19分的患者有效率为77.5%。家庭医院治疗的有效性与严重程度呈负相关。

结论

对于许多CAP病例,家庭医院治疗(HaD)是一种有效且安全的护理选择,而这些病例通常根据预测规则评分或附加入院标准建议入院治疗。

相似文献

1
[Efficacy of hospital at home (HaH) in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) with different degrees of severity].[居家医院(HaH)对不同严重程度社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的治疗效果]
Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Jun 12;135(2):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2009.12.021. Epub 2010 May 6.
2
[Where do we have to treat patients with community-acquired pneumonia?].[我们应该在哪里治疗社区获得性肺炎患者?]
Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Jun 12;135(2):63-4. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 May 6.
3
Efficacy and significance of various scores for pneumonia severity in the management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia in China.各种评分系统在中国社区获得性肺炎管理中对肺炎严重程度评估的疗效和意义。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Feb;125(4):639-45.
4
Pneumonia severity index class v patients with community-acquired pneumonia: characteristics, outcomes, and value of severity scores.社区获得性肺炎的肺炎严重指数Ⅴ级患者:特征、结局及严重程度评分的价值
Chest. 2007 Aug;132(2):515-22. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0306. Epub 2007 May 15.
5
Mortality prediction in community-acquired pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation; values of pneumonia and intensive care unit severity scores.需要机械通气的社区获得性肺炎的死亡率预测;肺炎和重症监护病房严重程度评分的价值。
Tuberk Toraks. 2010;58(1):25-34.
6
Performances of prognostic scoring systems in patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia.预测评分系统在医疗相关性肺炎患者中的表现。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;56(5):625-32. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis970. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
7
Validation of a clinical prediction model for early admission to the intensive care unit of patients with pneumonia.验证一种用于肺炎患者早期入住重症监护病房的临床预测模型。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;19(9):993-1003. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01424.x.
8
An audit of inpatient management of community-acquired pneumonia in Oman: a comparison with regional clinical guidelines.阿曼社区获得性肺炎住院管理的审核:与区域临床指南的比较。
J Infect Public Health. 2012 Jun;5(3):250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
9
CURB-65, PSI, and APACHE II to assess mortality risk in patients with severe sepsis and community acquired pneumonia in PROWESS.CURB-65、PSI 和 APACHE II 评估 PROWESS 中严重脓毒症和社区获得性肺炎患者的死亡风险。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;26(1):34-40. doi: 10.1177/0885066610383949.
10
Comparing the pneumonia severity index with CURB-65 in patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia.比较社区获得性肺炎患者的肺炎严重程度指数与CURB-65评分。
Scand J Infect Dis. 2008;40(4):293-300. doi: 10.1080/00365540701663381.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes and costs of home hospitalisation compared to traditional hospitalisation for infectious diseases in Israel: a cohort study.与传统住院治疗相比,家庭住院治疗在传染病方面的结果和成本:一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 20;14(11):e085347. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085347.
2
Ten Issues for Updating in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: An Expert Review.社区获得性肺炎更新的十个问题:专家综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 30;12(21):6864. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216864.