Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Aug;8(8):655-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.04.023. Epub 2010 May 6.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is no consensus on the appropriateness of concomitant immunomodulators with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy for Crohn's disease. Some patients benefit from concomitant immunomodulators, but concerns related to infections and lymphoma risk have dampened enthusiasm for this approach. We applied the RAND/University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method toward establishing appropriateness of concomitant immunomodulators and anti-TNF therapies for Crohn's disease.
A literature review was conducted regarding efficacy and safety of concomitant immunomodulators in the setting of anti-TNF therapy for Crohn's disease and presented to the Building Research in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Globally group, a globally diverse panel of 13 gastroenterologists clinically experienced in inflammatory bowel disease. A total of 134 scenarios were constructed using several clinical variables. Panelists used a modified Delphi method to rate the appropriateness of concomitant immunomodulators, and met to discuss and re-rate appropriateness. Disagreement was assessed using a validated index.
Concomitant immunomodulators were generally rated appropriate for 63 scenarios, uncertain for 60 scenarios, and inappropriate for 11 scenarios. In general, concomitant immunomodulators were appropriate for those with extensive disease, shorter duration of disease, perianal involvement, prior surgery, females, and older patients (>26 y). Concomitant immunomodulators were generally rated inappropriate for young males, and in some scenarios involving uncomplicated disease. Smoking and the particular anti-TNF medication did not influence ratings. Disagreement was observed in 6 of 134 scenarios.
The appropriateness of concomitant immunomodulators with anti-TNF therapy for Crohn's disease was determined through a modified Delphi panel approach based on expert interpretation of the available literature. Clinicians should consider multiple factors when considering concomitant immunomodulators with anti-TNF treatment.
对于克罗恩病患者,联合使用抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)治疗和免疫调节剂是否合适,目前尚无共识。一些患者从联合免疫调节剂中获益,但感染和淋巴瘤风险相关问题降低了对此类方法的应用热情。我们采用 RAND/加州大学洛杉矶分校适宜性方法,确定克罗恩病患者联合使用免疫调节剂和抗 TNF 治疗的适宜性。
我们对免疫调节剂联合抗 TNF 治疗克罗恩病的疗效和安全性进行了文献复习,并将其提供给全球炎症性肠病研究小组(一个由 13 名在炎症性肠病方面具有丰富临床经验的全球各地的胃肠病专家组成的多元化小组)。使用几种临床变量构建了总共 134 个场景。小组成员采用改良 Delphi 法对联合使用免疫调节剂的适宜性进行了评分,并进行了讨论和重新评分。使用验证的指标评估了分歧。
一般来说,免疫调节剂联合治疗在 63 种情况下被认为是合适的,在 60 种情况下是不确定的,在 11 种情况下是不合适的。一般来说,免疫调节剂联合治疗适用于广泛性疾病、疾病病程较短、肛周受累、既往手术、女性和老年患者(>26 岁)。免疫调节剂联合治疗在年轻男性和某些无并发症疾病的情况下通常被认为是不合适的。吸烟和特定的抗 TNF 药物并不影响评分。在 134 个场景中的 6 个场景中观察到了分歧。
通过基于专家对现有文献的解释的改良 Delphi 小组方法,确定了克罗恩病患者联合使用抗 TNF 治疗和免疫调节剂的适宜性。临床医生在考虑使用抗 TNF 治疗联合免疫调节剂时,应考虑多种因素。