• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质子泵抑制剂试验在胃食管反流病中的应用:最佳截断值和持续时间。

The proton pump inhibitor test for gastroesophageal reflux disease: optimal cut-off value and duration.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical Sciences, L. Sacco University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Dig Liver Dis. 2010 Nov;42(11):785-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 May 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2010.04.002
PMID:20452300
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no accepted gold standard for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

AIM

To assess the optimal cut-off value and duration of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test in GERD patients with and without oesophagitis.

METHODS

Prospective study of 544 patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy and treated for 2 weeks with PPIs at double dose, and for 3 additional months at standard dose. The status of the patient at end of treatment was used as an independent diagnostic standard, i.e. patients completely asymptomatic were considered as "true" GERD patients.

RESULTS

PPI test was positive in 89.7-97.8% of the patients according to the cut-off or duration of test used. Test sensitivity ranged from 95.5% to 98.8%, whereas specificity did not exceed 36.3%. Positive predictive values ranged from 87% to 80%, negative predictive values ranged from 58% to 70%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The PPI test is a sensitive but poorly specific test in GERD patients. Its optimal duration is 1 week, and the optimal cut-off value is a decrease of heartburn score ≥75%. The diagnostic yield is higher in erosive oesophagitis compared with non-erosive reflux disease patients, similarly to the symptomatic response to 3-month PPI therapy.

摘要

背景

目前尚无公认的胃食管反流病(GERD)诊断金标准。

目的

评估质子泵抑制剂(PPI)试验在有和无食管炎的 GERD 患者中的最佳截断值和持续时间。

方法

对 544 例接受上消化道内镜检查的患者进行前瞻性研究,这些患者接受双倍剂量的 PPI 治疗 2 周,然后标准剂量治疗 3 个月。治疗结束时患者的状况被用作独立的诊断标准,即完全无症状的患者被认为是“真正”的 GERD 患者。

结果

根据所使用的截断值或试验持续时间,PPI 试验在 89.7-97.8%的患者中呈阳性。试验的灵敏度范围为 95.5%-98.8%,而特异性不超过 36.3%。阳性预测值范围为 87%-80%,阴性预测值范围为 58%-70%。

结论

PPI 试验是一种敏感但特异性差的 GERD 患者检测方法。其最佳持续时间为 1 周,最佳截断值为烧心评分下降≥75%。与非糜烂性反流病患者相比,在有食管炎的患者中,PPI 试验的诊断效果更高,与 3 个月 PPI 治疗的症状缓解反应相似。

相似文献

1
The proton pump inhibitor test for gastroesophageal reflux disease: optimal cut-off value and duration.质子泵抑制剂试验在胃食管反流病中的应用:最佳截断值和持续时间。
Dig Liver Dis. 2010 Nov;42(11):785-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 May 7.
2
The proton pump inhibitor test and the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.质子泵抑制剂试验与胃食管反流病的诊断。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Aug;4(4):423-7. doi: 10.1586/egh.10.38.
3
Eosinophilic esophagitis in GERD patients: a clinicopathological diagnosis using proton pump inhibitors.胃食管反流病患者的嗜酸性食管炎:使用质子泵抑制剂的临床病理诊断
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov;104(11):2856-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.468.
4
Esophageal acid exposure on proton pump inhibitors in unselected asymptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease patients.未选择的无症状胃食管反流病患者使用质子泵抑制剂后的食管酸暴露情况
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Oct;42(9):969-73. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31814b8fc2.
5
24-hour ambulatory pH-metry in patients with refractory heartburn: a prospective study.24 小时动态 pH 监测在难治性烧心患者中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2009 Mar;18(1):11-5.
6
Is longer duration of proton pump inhibitor trial better for gastroesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain?质子泵抑制剂试验时间延长对胃食管反流病相关非心源性胸痛是否更有益?
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Sep;24(9):1477-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05983.x.
7
Comparison of the degree of duodenogastroesophageal reflux and acid reflux between patients who failed to respond and those who were successfully treated with a proton pump inhibitor once daily.每日一次使用质子泵抑制剂治疗无效患者与成功治疗患者之间十二指肠胃食管反流程度和酸反流程度的比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Aug;104(8):2005-13. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.240. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
8
Con: Impedance-pH testing does not commonly alter management of GERD.反对意见:阻抗- pH测试通常不会改变胃食管反流病的治疗方案。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov;104(11):2667-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.501.
9
Gastroesophageal reflux disease poorly responsive to single-dose proton pump inhibitors in patients without Barrett's esophagus: acid reflux, bile reflux, or both?在无巴雷特食管的患者中,单剂量质子泵抑制剂治疗反应不佳的胃食管反流病:是酸反流、胆汁反流,还是两者皆有?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):981-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04171.x.
10
Evolving issues in the management of reflux disease?反流性疾病管理中的新问题?
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;25(4):342-51. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32832c1504.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease by a trial of potassium-competitive acid blocker treatment.通过钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂治疗试验诊断胃食管反流病的准确性
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 May 26;25(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03981-1.
2
Poliprotect vs Omeprazole in the Relief of Heartburn, Epigastric Pain, and Burning in Patients Without Erosive Esophagitis and Gastroduodenal Lesions: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.波利特与奥美拉唑在缓解无糜烂性食管炎和胃十二指肠病变的烧心、上腹痛和烧灼感患者中的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 1;118(11):2014-2024. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002360. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
3
Assessment of gastric acidity by short-duration intragastric pH-monitoring with standardised breakfast in functional and some other dyspepsias.
在功能性消化不良及其他一些消化不良患者中,通过短时间胃内pH监测并给予标准化早餐来评估胃酸度。
Prz Gastroenterol. 2020;15(3):258-266. doi: 10.5114/pg.2020.99041. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
4
The Spectrum of Reflux Phenotypes.反流表型谱
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2019 Dec;15(12):646-654.
5
Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus.现代 GERD 诊断:里昂共识。
Gut. 2018 Jul;67(7):1351-1362. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314722. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
6
The value of early wireless esophageal pH monitoring in diagnosing functional heartburn in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.早期无线食管 pH 监测在诊断难治性胃食管反流病功能性烧心中的价值。
Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Oct;58(10):2933-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2728-4. Epub 2013 Jun 14.