Suppr超能文献

两种化疗方案用于体力状况不佳的非小细胞肺癌患者:一项 II 期随机试验。

Two schedules of chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer in poor performance status: a phase II randomized trial.

机构信息

Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Anticancer Drugs. 2010 Jul;21(6):662-8. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e32833ab7a0.

Abstract

We present experience from a phase II randomized clinical trial, comparing standard gemcitabine as monotherapy with low-dose gemcitabine in long infusion in a doublet with cisplatin at reduced dose for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and who are unfit for standard platin-based chemotherapy. Eligible patients had microscopically confirmed NSCLC in stage IIIB (wet) or IV, were chemo-naive, and were in poor performance status or presented with significant comorbidity. Standard treatment with gemcitabine, 1250 mg/m in 20-30 min on days 1 and 8 as monotherapy (arm A) was compared with low-dose gemcitabine in long infusion (200 mg/m in 6 h on day 1) and cisplatin at 60 mg/m on day 2 (arm B). Both treatment schedules were repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or to a maximum of six cycles. A total of 112 patients (83 male, 29 female, median age 66 years) were randomized between arm A (57 patients) and B (55 patients). The two groups were balanced for prognostic factors. Fifty-three patients in arm A and 52 in arm B received at least one application of chemotherapy and were evaluable for toxicity and response. The median number of cycles was four and five for arms A and B, respectively. Except for grade 3 anemia (one patient in arm A and two in arm B), no other major toxicity was seen. Regarding response to treatment, arm B was superior: 1 complete response and 13 partial remissions (response rate 26.9%) as compared with five partial remissions (response rate 9.4%) in arm A (P<0.01). The median time to progression was 3.8 and 5.6 months, and the median survival was 4.3 and 6.8 months for arms A and B, respectively (P<0.05). Treatment with low-dose gemcitabine in long infusion and cisplatin at reduced dose has very low toxicity, is effective, was found to be superior to monotherapy with gemcitabine in standard doses, and is suitable for patients with NSCLC who cannot tolerate a standard platin-based doublet.

摘要

我们报告了一项 II 期随机临床试验的经验,该试验比较了标准剂量吉西他滨单药治疗与小剂量吉西他滨长输注联合顺铂(剂量降低)用于不能耐受标准铂类化疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的疗效。符合条件的患者为 IIIB 期(湿型)或 IV 期显微镜下确认的 NSCLC,为初治患者,表现为较差的体能状态或存在显著合并症。标准治疗为吉西他滨,1250mg/m2,20-30 分钟滴注,第 1 和 8 天单药治疗(A 组),与小剂量吉西他滨长输注(第 1 天 6 小时 200mg/m2)和顺铂 60mg/m2(第 2 天)联合治疗(B 组)进行比较。两种治疗方案均每 3 周重复一次,直到疾病进展、无法耐受毒性或最多进行 6 个周期。共有 112 名患者(83 名男性,29 名女性,中位年龄 66 岁)被随机分配到 A 组(57 名患者)和 B 组(55 名患者)。两组患者的预后因素平衡。A 组 53 例和 B 组 52 例患者至少接受了一次化疗应用,并可评估毒性和反应。A 组和 B 组的中位化疗周期数分别为 4 个和 5 个。除了 3 级贫血(A 组 1 例,B 组 2 例)外,未观察到其他主要毒性。关于治疗反应,B 组更优:1 例完全缓解和 13 例部分缓解(缓解率 26.9%),而 A 组仅 5 例部分缓解(缓解率 9.4%)(P<0.01)。进展时间的中位数分别为 3.8 个月和 5.6 个月,A 组和 B 组的中位生存期分别为 4.3 个月和 6.8 个月(P<0.05)。低剂量吉西他滨长输注联合顺铂(剂量降低)治疗具有非常低的毒性,疗效显著,优于标准剂量吉西他滨单药治疗,适用于不能耐受标准铂类双联化疗的 NSCLC 患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验