Burton R V, Strichartz A F
Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Buffalo 14260.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1991 Apr;12(2):121-8.
The competence of young children to testify as witnesses in a court of law, especially with regard to the obligation to speak the truth, is examined. The relevant empirical data from developmental literature is critically reviewed. Topics considered include the development of the concept of lies and truth, moral development, the relationship between moral reasoning and moral conduct, and observations of moral behavior. The ecological validity of laboratory analogs is considered in light of the extreme sensitivity to context of children's abilities and behavior. From available evidence, we conclude that young children consistently judge lying solely on whether what is said agrees with external facts regardless of inferred intent or belief of the speaker. Further, young children are less willing to lie because of extenuating circumstances than are older children and adults. The older child's and adult's decision on whether to tell a lie is based on a consideration of a number of complex internal and environmental factors. We conclude that children on the witness stand are likely to be motivated to be as honest, or more honest, than are adults.
本文探讨了幼儿在法庭上作为证人作证的能力,特别是关于讲真话的义务。对发展心理学文献中的相关实证数据进行了批判性回顾。所考虑的主题包括谎言与真相概念的发展、道德发展、道德推理与道德行为之间的关系以及道德行为观察。鉴于儿童能力和行为对情境的极端敏感性,考虑了实验室模拟的生态效度。根据现有证据,我们得出结论,幼儿始终仅根据所说内容是否与外部事实相符来判断说谎,而不考虑说话者的推断意图或信念。此外,与年龄较大的儿童和成年人相比,幼儿因情有可原的情况而说谎的意愿较低。年龄较大的儿童和成年人是否说谎的决定是基于对一些复杂的内部和环境因素的考虑。我们得出结论,证人席上的儿童可能比成年人更有动力保持诚实,或者更诚实。