Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Jun 15;50(12):1575-9. doi: 10.1086/652766.
Recent practice guidelines for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) describe as an "unresolved issue" the number of lumens from which blood culture specimens should be drawn to make a conservative diagnosis of CRBSI. Our objective was to determine how many CRBSI episodes would be missed if not all catheter lumens were sampled.
We performed a retrospective study (1 January 2003-31 May 2009) in patients with microbiologically proven CRBSI in which all available catheter lumens (those that did not contain clots) were used to draw blood culture samples. We calculated the number of episodes that would have been missed in double- and triple-lumen catheters if the culture of samples obtained from 1 lumens had been eliminated.
We studied 171 episodes of proven CRBSI in 154 patients. Overall, if 1 lumen-associated culture had been eliminated for both double-lumen and triple-lumen catheters, we would have missed 27.2% and 15.8% of episodes of CRBSI, respectively. If we had eliminated 2 cultures for triple-lumen catheters, 37.3% of episodes would have been missed.
Samples for blood culture should be obtained through all catheter lumens to establish a diagnosis of CRBSI.
最近的导管相关性血流感染(CRBSI)诊断指南将“未解决的问题”描述为,从多少个导管腔中抽取血培养标本才能做出保守诊断CRBSI。我们的目的是确定如果不采集所有导管腔的标本,将会遗漏多少例 CRBSI 发作。
我们进行了一项回顾性研究(2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 5 月 31 日),纳入了微生物学确诊的 CRBSI 患者,所有可用的导管腔(不含有凝块的导管腔)都用于抽取血培养标本。我们计算了如果排除从 1 个腔抽取的培养物,双腔和三腔导管中会遗漏多少例发作。
我们研究了 154 例患者的 171 例确诊的 CRBSI 发作。总体而言,如果排除双腔和三腔导管中每个腔的一个培养物,我们将分别遗漏 27.2%和 15.8%的 CRBSI 发作。如果排除三腔导管中的 2 个培养物,将遗漏 37.3%的发作。
应通过所有导管腔采集血培养标本以确立 CRBSI 的诊断。