• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

猫头鹰和沙鼠之间复杂的状态依赖型博弈。

Complex state-dependent games between owls and gerbils.

机构信息

Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 84990 Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel.

出版信息

Ecol Lett. 2010 Mar;13(3):302-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01447.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01447.x
PMID:20455918
Abstract

Predator-prey interactions are often behaviourally sophisticated games in which the predator and prey are players. Past studies teach us that hungrier prey take higher risks when foraging and that hungrier predators increase their foraging activity and are willing to take higher risks of injury. Yet no study has looked at the simultaneous responses of predator and prey to their own and each other's hunger levels in a controlled environment. We looked for evidence of a state-dependent game between predators and their prey by simultaneously manipulating the hunger state of barn owls, and Allenby's gerbils as prey. The owls significantly increased their activity when hungry. However, they did not appear to respond to changes in the hunger state of the gerbils. The gerbils reacted strongly to the owls' state, as well as to their own state when the risk was perceived as high. Our study shows that predator-prey interactions give rise to a complex state-dependent game.

摘要

捕食者-猎物相互作用通常是行为复杂的博弈,其中捕食者和猎物都是参与者。过去的研究告诉我们,觅食时饥饿的猎物会承担更高的风险,而饥饿的捕食者会增加觅食活动,并愿意承担更高的受伤风险。然而,没有研究在受控环境中同时观察捕食者和猎物对自身和彼此饥饿水平的反应。我们通过同时操纵 barn 猫头鹰和 Allenby 沙鼠的饥饿状态,寻找捕食者和猎物之间状态依赖博弈的证据。当饥饿时,猫头鹰的活动显著增加。然而,它们似乎并没有对沙鼠饥饿状态的变化做出反应。沙鼠对猫头鹰的状态以及当风险被认为很高时对自身状态的反应非常强烈。我们的研究表明,捕食者-猎物相互作用产生了一种复杂的状态依赖博弈。

相似文献

1
Complex state-dependent games between owls and gerbils.猫头鹰和沙鼠之间复杂的状态依赖型博弈。
Ecol Lett. 2010 Mar;13(3):302-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01447.x.
2
State of emergency: behavior of gerbils is affected by the hunger state of their predators.紧急状态:沙鼠的行为受到其捕食者饥饿状态的影响。
Ecology. 2010 Feb;91(2):593-600. doi: 10.1890/09-0112.1.
3
What do predators really want? The role of gerbil energetic state in determining prey choice by Barn Owls.捕食者真正想要的是什么?沙鼠的能量状态在决定仓鸮捕食猎物中的作用。
Ecology. 2014 Feb;95(2):280-5. doi: 10.1890/13-0836.1.
4
To dare or not to dare? Risk management by owls in a predator-prey foraging game.敢还是不敢?在捕食者 - 猎物觅食博弈中猫头鹰的风险管理。
Oecologia. 2014 Jul;175(3):825-34. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-2956-0. Epub 2014 May 9.
5
Predator facilitation or interference: a game of vipers and owls.捕食者促进或干扰:毒蛇和猫头鹰的游戏。
Oecologia. 2014 Apr;174(4):1301-9. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2760-2. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
6
Moonlight avoidance in gerbils reveals a sophisticated interplay among time allocation, vigilance and state-dependent foraging.沙鼠避免月光照射,揭示了时间分配、警戒和状态依赖觅食之间的复杂相互作用。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 22;277(1687):1469-74. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2036. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
7
Driven to distraction: detecting the hidden costs of flea parasitism through foraging behaviour in gerbils.被逼疯了:通过沙鼠的觅食行为发现跳蚤寄生的隐藏代价。
Ecol Lett. 2011 Jan;14(1):47-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01549.x. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
8
The Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model with foraging-predation risk trade-offs.具有觅食 - 捕食风险权衡的洛特卡 - 沃尔泰拉捕食者 - 猎物模型。
Am Nat. 2007 Nov;170(5):771-82. doi: 10.1086/522055. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
9
Ninja owl; Gerbils over-anticipate an unexpected flying predator.忍者猫头鹰;沙鼠对意外出现的飞行捕食者反应过度。
Behav Processes. 2020 Sep;178:104161. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104161. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
10
The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and microhabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum.仓鸮(Tyto alba)对阿氏沙鼠和金字塔沙鼠活动及微生境选择的影响。
Oecologia. 1996 Feb;105(3):313-319. doi: 10.1007/BF00328733.

引用本文的文献

1
Fire as a driver and mediator of predator-prey interactions.火作为驱动和调节捕食者-猎物相互作用的因素。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Aug;97(4):1539-1558. doi: 10.1111/brv.12853. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
2
The effect of COVID19 pandemic restrictions on an urban rodent population.新冠疫情限制措施对城市啮齿动物种群的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 21;11(1):12957. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92301-0.
3
Evolutionary dynamics in the Anthropocene: Life history and intensity of human contact shape antipredator responses.人类世的进化动态:生活史和人类接触强度塑造了反捕食者反应。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Sep 22;18(9):e3000818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000818. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Time to revisit? A predator's previous successes and failures in prey capture determine its return time to patches.是时候重新审视了?捕食者之前在猎物捕获方面的成功与失败决定了它返回斑块的时间。
Oecologia. 2019 Jun;190(2):387-397. doi: 10.1007/s00442-019-04425-w. Epub 2019 May 30.
5
To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear-driven behaviors in lactating dolphins.喂还是不喂?恐惧驱动行为对哺乳期海豚的生物能量学影响。
Ecol Evol. 2017 Dec 27;8(2):1384-1398. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3732. eCollection 2018 Jan.
6
Risk of predation makes foragers less choosy about their food.被捕食的风险使得觅食者对食物的挑剔程度降低。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187167. eCollection 2017.
7
The dilemma of foraging herbivores: dealing with food and fear.食草动物觅食的困境:应对食物与恐惧
Oecologia. 2014 Nov;176(3):677-89. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3076-6. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
8
To dare or not to dare? Risk management by owls in a predator-prey foraging game.敢还是不敢?在捕食者 - 猎物觅食博弈中猫头鹰的风险管理。
Oecologia. 2014 Jul;175(3):825-34. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-2956-0. Epub 2014 May 9.
9
Responses of a top and a meso predator and their prey to moon phases.顶级捕食者和中层捕食者及其猎物对月相的反应。
Oecologia. 2013 Nov;173(3):753-66. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2651-6. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
10
Separating spatial search and efficiency rates as components of predation risk.将空间搜索和效率比率分离为捕食风险的组成部分。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Nov 22;279(1747):4626-33. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1698. Epub 2012 Sep 12.