Suppr超能文献

捕食者促进或干扰:毒蛇和猫头鹰的游戏。

Predator facilitation or interference: a game of vipers and owls.

机构信息

Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Sde Boker Campus, 84990, Midreseht Ben-Gurion, Israel,

出版信息

Oecologia. 2014 Apr;174(4):1301-9. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2760-2. Epub 2013 Oct 12.

Abstract

In predator-prey foraging games, the prey's reaction to one type of predator may either facilitate or hinder the success of another predator. We ask, do different predator species affect each other's patch selection? If the predators facilitate each other, they should prefer to hunt in the same patch; if they interfere, they should prefer to hunt alone. We performed an experiment in a large outdoor vivarium where we presented barn owls (Tyto alba) with a choice of hunting greater Egyptian gerbils (Gerbillus pyramidum) in patches with or without Saharan horned vipers (Cerastes cerastes). Gerbils foraged on feeding trays set under bushes or in the open. We monitored owl location, activity, and hunting attempts, viper activity and ambush site location, and the foraging behavior of the gerbils in bush and open microhabitats. Owls directed more attacks towards patches with vipers, and vipers were more active in the presence of owls. Owls and vipers facilitated each other's hunting through their combined effect on gerbil behavior, especially on full moon nights when vipers are more active. Owls forced gerbils into the bushes where vipers preferred to ambush, while viper presence chased gerbils into the open where they were exposed to owls. Owls and vipers took advantage of their indirect positive effect on each other. In the foraging game context, they improve each other's patch quality and hunting success.

摘要

在捕食者-猎物觅食博弈中,猎物对一种捕食者的反应可能会促进或阻碍另一种捕食者的成功。我们想问,不同的捕食者物种会相互影响它们的斑块选择吗?如果捕食者相互促进,它们应该更喜欢在同一个斑块中狩猎;如果它们相互干扰,它们应该更喜欢独自狩猎。我们在一个大型户外围栏中进行了一项实验,在那里我们为仓鸮(Tyto alba)提供了在有或没有撒哈拉角蝰(Cerastes cerastes)的斑块中捕食更多的埃及大沙鼠(Gerbillus pyramidum)的选择。沙鼠在设置在灌木丛下或开阔地的喂食托盘上觅食。我们监测了猫头鹰的位置、活动和狩猎尝试、蝰蛇的活动和伏击地点以及沙鼠在灌木丛和开阔小生境中的觅食行为。猫头鹰更多地将攻击指向有蝰蛇的斑块,而蝰蛇在猫头鹰存在的情况下更加活跃。猫头鹰和蝰蛇通过对沙鼠行为的共同影响相互促进了彼此的狩猎,特别是在蝰蛇活动更为活跃的满月之夜。猫头鹰迫使沙鼠进入蝰蛇喜欢伏击的灌木丛,而蝰蛇的存在则将沙鼠驱赶至开阔地,使它们暴露在猫头鹰的攻击范围内。猫头鹰和蝰蛇利用了它们对彼此的间接积极影响。在觅食博弈的背景下,它们提高了彼此的斑块质量和狩猎成功率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验