• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远程磁导航在起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器患者中的安全性。

Safety of remote magnetic navigation in patients with pacemakers and implanted cardioverter defibrillators.

机构信息

Department of Electrophysiology, University of Leipzig, Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Oct;21(10):1130-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01777.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01777.x
PMID:20455985
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Remote magnetic catheter navigation (MNS) has been shown to be feasible and safe for radiofrequency catheter ablation of various cardiac arrhythmias. However, its safety in patients with implanted pacemakers or cardioverter-defibrillators has not yet been studied.

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective case series study intends to assess the acute and short-term safety of remote MNS in patients with implanted pacemakers or cardioverter-defibrillators.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and June 2009, a total of 31 patients with implanted pacemakers (n = 5) or cardioverter-defibrillators (n = 26) underwent 32 catheter ablation procedures using the remote MNS. Baseline pacing thresholds, sensed amplitudes, pacing and, if available, shock impedances as well as battery status were measured in all devices before, immediately after, and 1-3 months after catheter ablation.

RESULTS

After ablation, no statistically significant difference in atrial sensing (2.7 ± 1.5 mV vs 3.1 ± 1.9 mV, P = 0.18) and impedance (457 ± 104 Ω vs 449 ± 101 Ω, P = 0.37) were observed. After ablation, no statistically significant difference in right ventricular sensing (10.4 ± 3.8 mV vs 10.9 ± 4.9 mV, P = 0.43) and impedance (535 ± 118 Ω vs 534 ± 120 Ω, P = 0.913) were observed. No changes in pacing threshold could be observed in all but 2 patients with biventricular cardioverter-defibrillators who underwent ventricular tachycardia ablation in lateral wall of left ventricle near the implanted epicardial electrode.

CONCLUSIONS

Ablation procedures using remote MNS can be performed safely in patients with implanted devices with no significant effects on device system integrity. Long endocardial ablation close to the insertion site of the implanted epicardial left ventricular leads can affect the pacing and/or sensing characteristics of these electrodes.

摘要

背景

远程磁导航(MNS)已被证明在各种心脏心律失常的射频导管消融中是可行且安全的。然而,其在植入起搏器或除颤器患者中的安全性尚未得到研究。

目的

本回顾性病例系列研究旨在评估远程 MNS 在植入起搏器或除颤器患者中的急性和短期安全性。

方法

2008 年 1 月至 2009 年 6 月,共有 31 例植入起搏器(n=5)或除颤器(n=26)的患者接受了 32 例使用远程 MNS 的导管消融术。所有设备的起搏阈值、感知幅度、起搏(如有)以及电击和电池状态均在消融术前、即刻和 1-3 个月后进行测量。

结果

消融后,心房感知(2.7±1.5 mV 比 3.1±1.9 mV,P=0.18)和阻抗(457±104 Ω 比 449±101 Ω,P=0.37)均无统计学差异。消融后,右心室感知(10.4±3.8 mV 比 10.9±4.9 mV,P=0.43)和阻抗(535±118 Ω 比 534±120 Ω,P=0.913)均无统计学差异。除 2 例接受左心室外侧壁室性心动过速消融的双心室除颤器患者外,所有患者的起搏阈值均无变化。

结论

在植入设备的患者中使用远程 MNS 进行消融程序是安全的,不会对设备系统完整性产生显著影响。靠近植入的左心室心外膜导联插入部位的心内膜消融可能会影响这些电极的起搏和/或感知特性。

相似文献

1
Safety of remote magnetic navigation in patients with pacemakers and implanted cardioverter defibrillators.远程磁导航在起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器患者中的安全性。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Oct;21(10):1130-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01777.x.
2
Safety of implantable pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators in the magnetic field of a novel remote magnetic navigation system.新型远程磁导航系统磁场中植入式起搏器和除颤器的安全性。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Oct;21(10):1136-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01806.x.
3
Novel robotic catheter manipulation system integrated with remote magnetic navigation for fully remote ablation of atrial tachyarrhythmias: a two-centre evaluation.新型机器人导管操控系统与远程磁导航集成,实现完全远程消融房性快速心律失常:两中心评估。
Europace. 2012 Dec;14(12):1715-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus169. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
4
Interference of remote magnetic catheter navigation and ablation with implanted devices for pacing and defibrillation.远程磁导航导管的干扰与起搏和除颤植入装置。
Europace. 2010 Nov;12(11):1574-80. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq300. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
5
Atrial fibrillation ablation by aortic retrograde approach using a magnetic navigation system.经主动脉逆行途径应用磁导航系统行心房颤动消融术。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Apr;21(4):455-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01666.x. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
6
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using remote magnetic catheter navigation: a case-control study.应用远程磁导航导管消融术治疗心房颤动:一项病例对照研究。
Europace. 2011 Jan;13(1):45-50. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq344. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
7
Initial clinical experience with a remote magnetic catheter navigation system for ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter.用于消融三尖瓣峡部依赖性右房扑动的远程磁导管导航系统的初步临床经验。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 May;31(5):597-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01047.x.
8
Robotic magnetic navigation for ablation of human arrhythmias: initial experience.用于人类心律失常消融的机器人磁导航:初步经验。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 May;102(5):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.02.009. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
9
Remote magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation: is 'As Good as Manual' good enough.心房颤动消融的远程磁导航:“与手动操作一样好”是否足够好。
Europace. 2011 Jan;13(1):5-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq380. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
10
Impact of catheter ablation with remote magnetic navigation on procedural outcomes in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.采用远程磁导航的导管消融术对持续性和长期持续性心房颤动患者手术结果的影响
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Nov;44(2):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0037-x. Epub 2015 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Efficacy and Impact on Mortality of Remote Magnetic Navigation Guided Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias.远程磁导航引导下导管消融治疗室性心律失常的长期疗效及对死亡率的影响
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 13;10(20):4695. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204695.
2
The Effects of Catheter Ablation on Permanent Pacemakers and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators.导管消融对永久性起搏器和植入式心脏除颤器的影响。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2017 Mar 15;8(3):2630-2635. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2017.080303. eCollection 2017 Mar.
3
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Magnetic Navigation Comparison With Conventional Approach During Long-Term Follow-Up.
使用磁导航进行心房颤动消融与传统方法在长期随访中的比较
J Atr Fibrillation. 2015 Oct 31;8(3):1276. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1276. eCollection 2015 Oct-Nov.
4
Robotic magnetic navigation for ablation of human arrhythmias.用于人类心律失常消融的机器人磁导航
Med Devices (Auckl). 2016 Sep 19;9:331-339. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S96167. eCollection 2016.
5
Forces on cardiac implantable electronic devices during remote magnetic navigation.远程磁导航时心脏植入式电子设备上的力。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2013 Mar;102(3):185-92. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0513-6. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
6
Safety and efficacy of the remote magnetic navigation for ablation of ventricular tachycardias--a systematic review.远程磁导航用于室性心动过速消融的安全性和有效性——一项系统评价
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun;34(1):65-71. doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9645-2. Epub 2011 Dec 20.