Suppr超能文献

布地奈德/福莫特罗用于哮喘的维持和缓解治疗:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and reliever therapy of asthma: a meta analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Outcomes Research, AstraZeneca UK Ltd, Luton, UK.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Apr;64(5):619-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02320.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) for Maintenance and Reliever Therapy (Symbicort SMART) Turbuhaler with twice daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment, alone or in combination with a long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA).

METHODS

Meta analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using a fixed effects model. RCTs were included if the comparator with budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and relief had the equivalent, or up to fourfold higher, maintenance dose of ICS. The primary outcome was the incidence of severe exacerbation (oral glucocorticosteroid treatment for > or = 3 days, emergency visit and/or hospitalisation).

RESULTS

Of the seven RCTs available six met the inclusion criteria. Risk of severe exacerbations was significantly reduced: 41% vs. higher-dose budesonide alone [relative risk (RR) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.51-0.68, p < 0.00001]; 43% vs. equivalent dose budesonide/formoterol as maintenance twice daily (RR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.49-0.66, p < 0.00001); 24% vs. higher-dose salmeterol/fluticasone twice daily (RR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64-0.90, p = 0.002); and 26% vs. higher-dose budesonide/formoterol twice daily (RR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.58-0.96, p = 0.02). Significant heterogeneity was not detected in the primary analyses (p > 0.1). Secondary analyses also demonstrated that budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and relief reduced the most severe exacerbations, resulting in less hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits than higher-dose budesonide, equivalent dose budesonide/formoterol and higher-dose salmeterol/fluticasone twice daily.

CONCLUSION

Budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and relief is significantly more effective at reducing severe exacerbations than higher-dose ICS alone, or in combination with a LABA. This has important implications for treating uncontrolled patients at steps 2 and 3 of the joint BTS/SIGN guidelines.

摘要

目的

比较布地奈德/福莫特罗(信必可)维持和缓解治疗(信必可 SMART)与每日两次吸入皮质激素(ICS)单独或与长效β2-激动剂(LABA)联合治疗的疗效。

方法

使用固定效应模型对随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析。如果布地奈德/福莫特罗维持和缓解治疗的对照药物具有等效或高达四倍更高的 ICS 维持剂量,则纳入 RCT。主要结局为严重加重(口服糖皮质激素治疗 > 或 = 3 天、急诊就诊和/或住院)的发生率。

结果

在可用的 7 项 RCT 中,有 6 项符合纳入标准。严重加重的风险显著降低:41% 比高剂量布地奈德单独治疗[相对风险(RR)0.59,95%置信区间(95%CI):0.51-0.68,p < 0.00001];43% 比等效剂量布地奈德/福莫特罗作为每日两次维持治疗(RR 0.57,95%CI:0.49-0.66,p < 0.00001);24% 比高剂量沙美特罗/氟替卡松每日两次治疗(RR 0.76,95%CI:0.64-0.90,p = 0.002);26% 比高剂量布地奈德/福莫特罗每日两次治疗(RR 0.74,95%CI:0.58-0.96,p = 0.02)。主要分析中未检测到显著异质性(p > 0.1)。二次分析还表明,布地奈德/福莫特罗维持和缓解治疗可显著降低最严重的加重事件,与高剂量 ICS 单独治疗或与 LABA 联合治疗相比,导致更少的住院/意外和急诊就诊。

结论

布地奈德/福莫特罗维持和缓解治疗在降低严重加重方面明显优于高剂量 ICS 单独治疗或与 LABA 联合治疗。这对治疗联合 BTS/SIGN 指南第 2 步和第 3 步的未控制患者具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验