• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同轴、微同轴和双轴微切口白内障手术:前瞻性对比研究。

Coaxial, microcoaxial, and biaxial microincision cataract surgery: prospective comparative study.

机构信息

Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, 2nd Ophthalmology Department, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 May;36(5):740-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.013.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.013
PMID:20457364
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the intraoperative and postoperative results of 3 phacoemulsification techniques.

SETTING

Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, 2nd Ophthalmology Department, Ankara, Turkey.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized study, patients had standard coaxial (2.8 mm incisions), microcoaxial (2.2 mm incisions), or biaxial microincision (1.2 to 1.4 mm trapezoidal incisions) phacoemulsification. Intraoperative phaco parameters and total surgical time were measured and complications recorded. Postoperative visual acuity improvement, pachymetric differences, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) results were compared.

RESULTS

Each group comprised 45 eyes. There were no significant differences between the 3 groups in demographic, morphologic, or preoperative surgical data. The mean effective phaco time was 2.56 seconds +/- 2.46 (SD) in the standard coaxial group, 1.98 +/- 1.91 seconds in the microcoaxial group, and 1.29 +/- 1.85 seconds in the biaxial microincision group (P<.05). The mean total surgical time was 14.48 +/- 4.21 minutes, 13.01 +/- 3.66 minutes, and 18.79 +/- 6.58 minutes, respectively (P<.01), and the mean measured final incision size was 2.83 +/- 0.11 mm, 2.26 +/- 0.07 mm, and 1.89 +/- 0.21 mm, respectively. The mean SIA 90 days postoperatively was 0.46 diopter (D), 0.24 D, and 0.13 D, respectively (P<.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rate, visual acuity gain, or pachymetric change between the groups (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

All 3 techniques were reliable, functional, and effective, yielding good visual outcomes and low phaco parameters and complication rates. Biaxial microincision surgery, with the smallest incisions, induced less astigmatism and reduced all intraoperative phaco parameters except total surgical time.

摘要

目的

比较 3 种超声乳化术的术中及术后结果。

设置

土耳其安卡拉阿塔图尔克培训与研究医院第 2 眼科。

方法

在这项前瞻性随机研究中,患者接受标准同轴(2.8mm 切口)、微同轴(2.2mm 切口)或双轴微切口(1.2 至 1.4mm 梯形切口)超声乳化术。测量术中超声参数和总手术时间并记录并发症。比较术后视力提高、角膜厚度差异和手术诱导散光(SIA)结果。

结果

每组 45 只眼。3 组间在人口统计学、形态学或术前手术数据方面无显著差异。标准同轴组的平均有效超声乳化时间为 2.56 秒±2.46(标准差),微同轴组为 1.98 秒±1.91 秒,双轴微切口组为 1.29 秒±1.85 秒(P<.05)。平均总手术时间分别为 14.48 秒±4.21 分钟、13.01 秒±3.66 分钟和 18.79 秒±6.58 分钟(P<.01),平均测量的最终切口大小分别为 2.83 毫米±0.11 毫米、2.26 毫米±0.07 毫米和 1.89 毫米±0.21 毫米。术后 90 天的平均 SIA 分别为 0.46 屈光度(D)、0.24 D 和 0.13 D(P<.01)。各组间的并发症发生率、视力提高或角膜厚度变化无统计学差异(P>.05)。

结论

所有 3 种技术均可靠、有效,产生良好的视觉效果和较低的超声参数及并发症发生率。双轴微切口手术切口最小,引起的散光最小,除总手术时间外,所有术中超声参数均降低。

相似文献

1
Coaxial, microcoaxial, and biaxial microincision cataract surgery: prospective comparative study.同轴、微同轴和双轴微切口白内障手术:前瞻性对比研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 May;36(5):740-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.013.
2
Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery in complicated cases.双眼微切口与同轴小切口白内障手术治疗复杂病例的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jan;36(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.07.036.
3
Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.经1.8毫米微小切口同轴超声乳化与经1.7毫米微小切口双手超声乳化术后手术源性散光的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;35(9):1563-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.04.037.
4
Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification.微切口白内障手术与同轴超声乳化术的治疗效果比较
Ophthalmology. 2005 Nov;112(11):1997-2003. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.06.024. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
5
Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.双轴微切口与同轴小切口透明角膜白内障手术对比
Ophthalmology. 2006 Oct;113(10):1818-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.013.
6
Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.微同轴白内障手术效果:1.8毫米系统与2.2毫米系统的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 May;35(5):874-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.031.
7
Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.经1.8毫米微小切口同轴超声乳化术与经1.7毫米微小切口双手超声乳化术后早期角膜内皮细胞损失的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;35(9):1570-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.014.
8
Contrast sensitivity after implantation of a spherical versus an aspherical intraocular lens in biaxial microincision cataract surgery.双轴微切口白内障手术中植入球面与非球面人工晶状体后的对比敏感度
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Mar;33(3):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.066.
9
Comparison of clinical outcomes with 2 small-incision diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses.比较两种小切口衍射型多焦点人工晶状体的临床效果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;38(1):60-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.036. Epub 2011 Nov 13.
10
Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.双手微切口与传统小切口同轴超声乳化术后手术创伤的个体内比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Apr;33(4):618-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Cataract surgery has minimal effect on corneal shape.白内障手术对角膜形状的影响极小。
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 11;10(1):e001920. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001920.
2
Intraocular Lens Fixation Technique Without Corneal Incision in Minimally Invasive Vitrectomized Eyes.微创玻璃体切除术后无角膜切口的人工晶状体固定技术
Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Apr;11(2):729-737. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00464-4. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
3
Comparison between 0.1% Nepafenac and 1% Prednisolone Eye Drop in Postoperative Management Following Micro-incisional Cataract Surgery.
0.1%尼泊非那胺与 1%泼尼松龙滴眼液在白内障超声乳化术后管理中的比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;35(3):188-197. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2020.0135. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
4
Evaluation of the Cataract Surgery 2018 Survey in Terms of Achieving Refractive Cataract Surgery Targets.评估 2018 年白内障手术调查结果在实现屈光性白内障手术目标方面的情况。
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 25;51(1):7-18. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.46020.
5
Effect of Excisional Goniotomy with the Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) on Surgically Induced Astigmatism.使用卡胡克双刃刀(KDB)进行切开式前房角切开术对手术性散光的影响。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 8;14:4297-4303. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S279073. eCollection 2020.
6
Comparison of Outcomes after Phacoemulsification with Two Different Corneal Incision Distances Anterior to the Limbus.两种不同角膜缘前切口距离的超声乳化术后结果比较。
J Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug 19;2019:1760742. doi: 10.1155/2019/1760742. eCollection 2019.
7
Hyperopic shift caused by capsule contraction syndrome after microincision foldable intraocular Lens implantation: case series.微小切口可折叠人工晶状体植入术后囊袋收缩综合征导致的远视移位:病例系列
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 May 20;19(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1117-y.
8
[Effect of different clear corneal incision sites on surgery efficacy and anterior segment parameters in patients undergoing phacoemulsification].不同透明角膜切口位置对白内障超声乳化术患者手术疗效及眼前节参数的影响
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2018 Dec 30;38(12):1492-1497. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.12.15.
9
Comparison of variations in cornea after one-handed and two-handed coaxial phacoemulsification.单手与双手同轴超声乳化术后角膜变化的比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep 19;12:1815-1822. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S172160. eCollection 2018.
10
Comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis.同轴微小切口与标准切口超声乳化白内障吸除术治疗年龄相关性白内障疗效的Meta分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0661-6.