Kurz Sabine, Krummenauer Frank, Thieme Hagen, Dick H Burkhard
Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Mar;33(3):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.066.
To determine whether implantation of a microincision intraocular lens (IOL) with a modified anterior surface, designed to compensate for the positive spherical aberration of the cornea in eyes of cataract patients, results in improved pseudophakic quality of vision in pseudophakic eyes after biaxial microincision phacoemulsification.
Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
In a nonrandomized parallel cohort investigation, the visual performance of 52 eyes of 52 patients unilaterally implanted with the aspherical Acri. Smart 36 A IOL (Acri.Tec) were compared with those of 25 eyes of 25 age-matched patients unilaterally implanted with the spherical Acri. Smart 46 S IOL (Acri.Tec). Eight weeks after surgery, the following parameters were assessed: uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), pupil size under various illumination conditions, high-contrast and low-contrast visual acuities, photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivities, capsulorhexis size, and wavefront aberration of the cornea and eye. The primary clinical endpoint of the comparison was defined as the area under the cycles per degree (cpd) curve of the contrast sensitivity profile.
The aspherical IOL group and the spherical IOL group did not differ in baseline characteristics. The median age was 71 years and 68% were women in the aspherical group versus 69 years and 62% women in the spherical group. The preoperative median UCVA was 20/80 in both groups. The UCVA, BCVA, pupil size, and capsulorhexis size were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Furthermore, no clinically relevant or statistically significant between-group differences were observed in the primary clinical endpoint. The median postoperative low mesopic contrast sensitivity without glare was 73 cpd in the aspherical group and 84 cpd in the spherical group (P = .624); a similar tendency was observed under high mesopic conditions (median 80 cpd and 83 cpd, respectively) (P = 1.000). Implantation of both IOL types resulted in a negative spherical aberration Z(4)(0), which was significantly different between the 2 groups (median -0.09 mum aspherical and -0.29 microm aspherical at a pupil size of 4.5 mm) (P<.001).
No clinically relevant postoperative differences in contrast sensitivity were observed between the aspherical microincision IOL and the spherical equivalent model. The development of microincision IOLs, which fit through corneal incisions smaller than 2.0 mm and improve night-driving conditions (eg, reduction of glare), could optimize modern biaxial cataract surgery.
确定植入一种前表面经过改良的微切口人工晶状体(IOL),该晶状体旨在补偿白内障患者眼睛中角膜的正球差,是否能在双轴微切口超声乳化术后改善人工晶状体眼的假晶状体视觉质量。
德国美因茨约翰内斯·古腾堡大学眼科。
在一项非随机平行队列研究中,将52例患者单侧植入非球面Acri.Smart 36 A IOL(Acri.Tec)的52只眼的视觉性能,与25例年龄匹配患者单侧植入球面Acri.Smart 46 S IOL(Acri.Tec)的25只眼进行比较。术后8周,评估以下参数:未矫正视力(UCVA)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、不同照明条件下的瞳孔大小、高对比度和低对比度视力、明视觉和中间视觉对比度敏感度、撕囊大小以及角膜和眼睛的波前像差。比较的主要临床终点定义为对比度敏感度曲线每度周期数(cpd)曲线下的面积。
非球面IOL组和球面IOL组在基线特征方面无差异。非球面组的中位年龄为71岁,女性占68%;球面组的中位年龄为69岁,女性占62%。两组术前UCVA中位数均为20/80。两组之间的UCVA、BCVA、瞳孔大小和撕囊大小在统计学上无差异。此外,在主要临床终点方面,未观察到具有临床相关性或统计学显著性的组间差异。非球面组术后无眩光时的低中间视觉对比度敏感度中位数为73 cpd,球面组为84 cpd(P = 0.624);在高中间视觉条件下也观察到类似趋势(分别为中位数80 cpd和83 cpd)(P = 1.000)。两种IOL植入后均产生了负球差Z(₄)(₀),两组之间有显著差异(瞳孔大小为4.5 mm时,非球面组中位数为-0.09μm,球面组为-0.29μm)(P<0.001)。
非球面微切口IOL与等效球面模型在术后对比度敏感度方面未观察到具有临床相关性的差异。能够通过小于2.0 mm的角膜切口植入并改善夜间驾驶条件(如减少眩光)的微切口IOL的开发,可能会优化现代双轴白内障手术。