• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Commitment to practice change: an evaluator's perspective.践行变革的承诺:评估者视角。
Eval Health Prof. 2010 Sep;33(3):256-75. doi: 10.1177/0163278710363960. Epub 2010 May 10.
2
Unanticipated learning outcomes associated with commitment to change in continuing medical education.与继续医学教育中致力于变革相关的意外学习成果。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2003 Summer;23(3):173-81. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340230309.
3
Drivers for change in primary care of diabetes following a protected learning time educational event: interview study of practitioners.在一次有保障的学习时间教育活动后,初级糖尿病护理变革的驱动因素:对从业者的访谈研究
BMC Med Educ. 2008 Jan 19;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-8-4.
4
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
5
Commitment to change instrument enhances program planning, implementation, and evaluation.致力于变革的工具可加强项目规划、实施和评估。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2004 Summer;24(3):153-62. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340240306.
6
Training and action for patient safety: embedding interprofessional education for patient safety within an improvement methodology.患者安全培训与行动:将患者安全的跨专业教育融入改进方法之中。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012 Spring;32(2):80-9. doi: 10.1002/chp.21130.
7
Commitment to change statements can predict actual change in practice.对变革声明的承诺可以预测实际的实践变革。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2003 Spring;23(2):81-93. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340230205.
8
Is the Cognitive Complexity of Commitment-to-Change Statements Associated With Change in Clinical Practice? An Application of Bloom's Taxonomy.改变承诺声明的认知复杂性与临床实践中的改变有关吗?布鲁姆分类法的应用。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2015 Summer;35(3):166-75. doi: 10.1002/chp.21303.
9
Viability of the commitment-for-change evaluation strategy in continuing medical education.变革承诺评估策略在继续医学教育中的可行性。
Acad Med. 1990 Sep;65(9 Suppl):S37-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199009000-00033.
10
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Safety and Quality of Care are Everybody's Business: Evaluating the Impact of a Continuing Professional Development Program beyond Satisfaction.患者安全与医疗质量人人有责:评估继续职业发展计划超出满意度的影响。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2019 Mar 11;8:46. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000046.1. eCollection 2019.
2
Case-based, asynchronous sleep education outcomes among primary care nurse practitioner students.基于案例的初级保健护士从业者学生的异步睡眠教育结果。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Oct 1;18(10):2367-2376. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10112.
3
Do learners implement what they learn? Commitment-to-change following an interprofessional palliative care course.学习者是否会实施所学内容?参与姑息治疗跨专业课程后的改变承诺。
Palliat Med. 2022 May;36(5):866-877. doi: 10.1177/02692163221081329. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
4
GP awareness, practice, knowledge and confidence: evaluation of the first nation-wide dementia-focused continuing medical education program in Australia.全科医生的认知、实践、知识和信心:澳大利亚首个全国性专注于痴呆症的继续医学教育项目的评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 10;21(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01178-x.
5
Applying Cognitive Learning Strategies to Enhance Learning and Retention in Clinical Teaching Settings.应用认知学习策略提高临床教学环境中的学习与记忆效果
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Nov 1;15:10850. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10850.
6
The SMARTIE Program: A Novel Initiative to Evaluate the Impact of AP Continuing Education on Clinical Practice.SMARTIE 项目:一项评估高级实践继续教育对临床实践影响的新举措。
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2017 Nov-Dec;8(7):776-788. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
7
Interprofessional Emergency Training Leads to Changes in the Workplace.跨专业应急培训导致工作场所的变化。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;19(1):185-192. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.11.35275. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
8
Adherence to Trained Standards After a Faculty Development Workshop on "Teaching With Simulated Patients".在关于“使用模拟患者进行教学”的教师发展研讨会后对训练标准的遵守情况
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Oct 16;34(4):Doc45. doi: 10.3205/zma001122. eCollection 2017.
9
Impact of interprofessional education about psychological and medical comorbidities on practitioners' knowledge and collaborative practice: mixed method evaluation of a national program.关于心理与医学共病的跨专业教育对从业者知识及协作实践的影响:一项全国性项目的混合方法评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 2;16(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1720-z.
10
Number needed to benefit from information (NNBI): proposal from a mixed methods research study with practicing family physicians.受益人数(NNBI):一项基于实践家庭医生的混合方法研究的建议。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;11(6):559-67. doi: 10.1370/afm.1565.

本文引用的文献

1
Continuing medical education: AMEE Education Guide No 35.继续医学教育:AMEE教育指南第35号。
Med Teach. 2008;30(7):652-66. doi: 10.1080/01421590802108323.
2
Aiming to improve care of older adults: an innovative faculty development workshop.旨在改善老年人护理:一场创新的教师发展研讨会。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):1053-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0593-1.
3
Requesting a commitment to change: conditions that produce behavioral or attitudinal commitment.要求做出改变的承诺:产生行为或态度承诺的条件。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008 Spring;28(2):60-6. doi: 10.1002/chp.158.
4
Effectiveness of continuing medical education.继续医学教育的有效性。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Jan(149):1-69.
5
A systematic review of evaluation in formal continuing medical education.正式继续医学教育评估的系统评价
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007 Winter;27(1):16-27. doi: 10.1002/chp.89.
6
A meta-analysis of continuing medical education effectiveness.继续医学教育效果的荟萃分析。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007 Winter;27(1):6-15. doi: 10.1002/chp.88.
7
Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review.与观察到的能力指标相比,医生自我评估的准确性:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2006 Sep 6;296(9):1094-102. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.9.1094.
8
Translation in the health professions: converting science into action.卫生专业领域的翻译:将科学转化为行动。
Eval Health Prof. 2006 Mar;29(1):7-32. doi: 10.1177/0163278705284441.
9
Accreditation for learning and change: quality and improvement as the outcome.学习与变革的认证:以质量和改进为成果。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2005 Summer;25(3):174-82. doi: 10.1002/chp.26.
10
Effects of continuing medical education on improving physician clinical care and patient health: a review of systematic reviews.继续医学教育对改善医生临床护理和患者健康的影响:系统评价的综述
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Summer;21(3):380-5. doi: 10.1017/s026646230505049x.

践行变革的承诺:评估者视角。

Commitment to practice change: an evaluator's perspective.

机构信息

Office of Continuing Professional Development in Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2701 International Lane, Ste 208, Madison, WI 53704, USA.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2010 Sep;33(3):256-75. doi: 10.1177/0163278710363960. Epub 2010 May 10.

DOI:10.1177/0163278710363960
PMID:20457715
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2921550/
Abstract

A commitment to practice change (CTC) approach may be used in educational program evaluation to document practice changes, examine the educational impact relative to the instructional focus, and improve understanding of the learning-to-change continuum. The authors reviewed various components and procedures of this approach and discussed some practical aspects of its application using an example of a study evaluating a presentation on menopausal care for primary care physicians. The CTC approach is a valuable evaluation tool, but it requires supplementation with other data to have a complete picture of the impact of education on practice. From the evaluation perspective, the self-reported nature of the CTC data is a major limitation of this method.

摘要

采用实践改变承诺(CTC)方法可用于教育项目评估,以记录实践改变,检验相对于教学重点的教育影响,并增进对学习改变连续体的理解。作者综述了该方法的不同组成部分和程序,并使用评估初级保健医生围绝经期保健演讲的研究实例讨论了其应用的一些实际方面。CTC 方法是一种有价值的评估工具,但需要补充其他数据,才能全面了解教育对实践的影响。从评估角度来看,CTC 数据的自我报告性质是该方法的主要局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2945/2921550/a92acec655de/nihms-176466-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2945/2921550/8e5a5a5b438e/nihms-176466-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2945/2921550/a92acec655de/nihms-176466-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2945/2921550/8e5a5a5b438e/nihms-176466-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2945/2921550/a92acec655de/nihms-176466-f0002.jpg