• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Interprofessional Emergency Training Leads to Changes in the Workplace.跨专业应急培训导致工作场所的变化。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;19(1):185-192. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.11.35275. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
2
Coordinating a Team Response to Behavioral Emergencies in the Emergency Department: A Simulation-Enhanced Interprofessional Curriculum.急诊科团队应对行为紧急情况的协调:一门模拟强化的跨专业课程。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;16(6):859-65. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.8.26220. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
3
Making an "Attitude Adjustment": Using a Simulation-Enhanced Interprofessional Education Strategy to Improve Attitudes Toward Teamwork and Communication.进行“态度调整”:运用模拟强化跨专业教育策略改善对团队合作与沟通的态度
Simul Healthc. 2016 Apr;11(2):117-25. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000133.
4
Interprofessional communication skills training to improve medical students' and nursing trainees' error communication - quasi-experimental pilot study.跨专业沟通技巧培训以提高医学生和护理实习生的差错沟通能力-准实验性试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04997-5.
5
Examining participant perceptions of an interprofessional simulation-based trauma team training for medical and nursing students.调查医学生和护理专业学生对基于模拟的跨专业创伤团队培训的参与者认知。
J Interprof Care. 2018 Jan;32(1):80-88. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1376625. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
6
Successes and Challenges of Interprofessional Physiologic Birth and Obstetric Emergency Simulations in a Nurse-Midwifery Education Program.护理助产教育项目中跨专业生理分娩与产科急诊模拟的成功与挑战
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Nov-Dec;60(6):735-43. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12393. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
7
Interprofessional education in team communication: working together to improve patient safety.团队沟通中的跨专业教育:携手合作以提高患者安全。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 May;22(5):414-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000952. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
8
Pre-registration nursing and occupational therapy students' experience of interprofessional simulation training designed to develop communication and team-work skills: A mixed methods study.注册护士和职业治疗学生参与以发展沟通和团队合作技能为目标的跨专业模拟培训的体验:一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 May;53:103073. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103073. Epub 2021 May 3.
9
Operating Room In Situ Interprofessional Simulation for Improving Communication and Teamwork.手术室现场跨专业模拟以改善沟通和团队合作。
J Surg Res. 2021 Apr;260:237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.051. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
10
Promoting collaboration in emergency medicine.促进急诊医学领域的合作。
Clin Teach. 2018 Dec;15(6):500-505. doi: 10.1111/tct.12762. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Teaching/learning formats and cross-cutting issues for the design of interprofessional education for healthcare professions - literature review and analysis of training and examination regulations.医疗专业人员跨专业教育设计的教学/学习形式及贯穿各领域的问题——文献综述与培训及考试规定分析
GMS J Med Educ. 2025 Apr 15;42(2):Doc26. doi: 10.3205/zma001750. eCollection 2025.
2
A novel blended and interprofessional approach to pediatric emergency training: self-assessment, perception, and perceived long-term effects.一种新颖的混合式跨专业儿科急诊培训方法:自我评估、感知和长期效果感知。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1389. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06381-3.
3
"Let's Chat!" Improving Emergency Department Staff Satisfaction with the Medication Reconciliation Process.“让我们聊一聊!”改善急诊部门工作人员对药物重整过程的满意度。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jul;25(4):624-633. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18324.
4
How do former medical and nursing undergraduates describe their learning on an interprofessional training Ward 12-18 months later? - A retrospective qualitative analysis.医学和护理专业的往届本科生在参与跨专业培训 12-18 个月后,如何描述他们的学习情况?——回顾性定性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Apr 21;23(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04212-5.
5
[Teambuilding interventions in clinical acute and emergency medicine].[临床急性与急诊医学中的团队建设干预措施]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2023 Apr;118(3):246-254. doi: 10.1007/s00063-023-00991-3. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
6
A Literature Study of Medical Simulations for Non-Technical Skills Training in Emergency Medicine: Twenty Years of Progress, an Integrated Research Framework, and Future Research Avenues.医学模拟在急诊非技术技能培训中的文献研究:二十年的进展、综合研究框架和未来研究方向。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;20(5):4487. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054487.
7
Interprofessional On-floor Education on Oxygen Therapy in COVID-19 Patients, Cardiac Arrest, and Procedural Sedation: Perception of Health-care Workers in Emergency Setting.关于新冠肺炎患者、心脏骤停及程序性镇静的氧气治疗的跨专业现场教育:急诊环境中医护人员的认知
Open Access Emerg Med. 2022 Sep 30;14:535-543. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S349656. eCollection 2022.
8
3 edizione Giornate della ricerca scientifica e delle esperienze professionali dei giovani: Società Italiana di Igiene, Medicina Preventiva e Sanità Pubblica (SItI) 25-26 marzo 2022.第三届青年科研与专业经验日:意大利卫生、预防医学与公共卫生学会(SItI),2022年3月25日至26日。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2022 Jul 6;63(1 Suppl 1):E1-E57. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.1s1. eCollection 2022.
9
Effects of using a cognitive aid on content and feasibility of debriefings of simulated emergencies.使用认知辅助工具对模拟紧急情况的汇报内容和可行性的影响。
GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Jun 15;38(5):Doc95. doi: 10.3205/zma001491. eCollection 2021.
10
Hospital Climate and Peer Report Intention on Adverse Medical Events: Role of Attribution and Rewards.医院氛围与同行对不良医疗事件的报告意愿:归因与奖励的作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 8;18(5):2725. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052725.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving patient safety through better teamwork: how effective are different methods of simulation debriefing? Protocol for a pragmatic, prospective and randomised study.通过改善团队协作提高患者安全:不同模拟总结方法的效果如何?一项实用、前瞻性随机研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 30;7(6):e015977. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015977.
2
The Potential of Collective Intelligence in Emergency Medicine: Pooling Medical Students' Independent Decisions Improves Diagnostic Performance.群体智慧在急诊医学中的潜力:汇集医学生的独立决策可提高诊断性能。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Aug;37(6):715-724. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17696998. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
3
How thinking about groups is different from groupthink.思考群体的方式与群体思维有何不同。
Med Educ. 2017 Feb;51(2):229. doi: 10.1111/medu.13137. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
4
A simulated night shift in the emergency room increases students' self-efficacy independent of role taking over during simulation.在急诊室进行模拟夜班可提高学生的自我效能感,这与模拟过程中的角色扮演无关。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 15;16:177. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0699-9.
5
Collaboration, cooperation, communication, contact and competencies.协作、合作、沟通、联系与能力。
GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Apr 29;33(2):Doc37. doi: 10.3205/zma001036. eCollection 2016.
6
More Than One Way to Debrief: A Critical Review of Healthcare Simulation Debriefing Methods.不止一种总结汇报方式:对医疗模拟总结汇报方法的批判性综述
Simul Healthc. 2016 Jun;11(3):209-17. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000148.
7
Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.医疗差错——美国第三大死因。
BMJ. 2016 May 3;353:i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139.
8
When Assessment Data Are Words: Validity Evidence for Qualitative Educational Assessments.当评估数据为文字时:定性教育评估的效度证据
Acad Med. 2016 Oct;91(10):1359-1369. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001175.
9
Making an "Attitude Adjustment": Using a Simulation-Enhanced Interprofessional Education Strategy to Improve Attitudes Toward Teamwork and Communication.进行“态度调整”:运用模拟强化跨专业教育策略改善对团队合作与沟通的态度
Simul Healthc. 2016 Apr;11(2):117-25. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000133.
10
Are we at risk of groupthink in our approach to teamwork interventions in health care?我们在医疗保健团队合作干预措施的方法上是否存在群体思维的风险?
Med Educ. 2016 Apr;50(4):400-8. doi: 10.1111/medu.12943.

跨专业应急培训导致工作场所的变化。

Interprofessional Emergency Training Leads to Changes in the Workplace.

机构信息

Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité, Berlin, Germany.

Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Medical Skills Lab, Charité, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;19(1):185-192. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.11.35275. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2017.11.35275
PMID:29383079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5785192/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Preventable mistakes occur frequently and can lead to patient harm and death. The emergency department (ED) is notoriously prone to such errors, and evidence suggests that improving teamwork is a key aspect to reduce the rate of error in acute care settings. Only a few strategies are in place to train team skills and communication in interprofessional situations. Our goal was to conceptualize, implement, and evaluate a training module for students of three professions involved in emergency care. The objective was to sensitize participants to barriers for their team skills and communication across professional borders.

METHODS

We developed a longitudinal simulation-enhanced training format for interprofessional teams, consisting of final-year medical students, advanced trainees of emergency nursing and student paramedics. The training format consisted of several one-day training modules, which took place twice in 2016 and 2017. Each training module started with an introduction to share one's roles, professional self-concepts, common misconceptions, and communication barriers. Next, we conducted different simulated cases. Each case consisted of a prehospital section (for paramedics and medical students), a handover (everyone), and an ED section (medical students and emergency nurses). After each training module, we assessed participants' "Commitment to Change." In this questionnaire, students were anonymously asked to state up to three changes that they wished to implement as a result of the course, as well as the strength of their commitment to these changes.

RESULTS

In total, 64 of 80 participants (80.0%) made at least one commitment to change after participating in the training modules. The total of 123 commitments was evenly distributed over four emerging categories: , , and . Roughly one third of behavior- and attitude-related commitments were directly related to interprofessional topics (e.g., "acknowledge other professions' work"), and these were equally distributed among professions. At the two-month follow-up, 32 participants (50%) provided written feedback on their original commitments: 57 of 62 (91.9%) commitments were at least partly realized at the follow-up, and only five (8.1%) commitments lacked realization entirely.

CONCLUSION

A structured simulation-enhanced intervention was successful in promoting change to the practice of emergency care, while training teamwork and communication skills jointly.

摘要

简介

可预防的错误经常发生,并可能导致患者受到伤害和死亡。急诊科(ED)特别容易出现此类错误,有证据表明,改善团队合作是降低急性护理环境中错误率的关键方面。只有少数策略用于培训团队技能和跨专业环境中的沟通。我们的目标是为参与急救护理的三个专业的学生构思、实施和评估一个培训模块。目的是使参与者认识到跨专业团队技能和沟通方面的障碍。

方法

我们为跨专业团队开发了一种纵向模拟增强培训格式,由医学专业的最后一年学生、急诊护理高级学员和学生护理人员组成。培训格式包括几个为期一天的培训模块,这些模块在 2016 年和 2017 年分两次进行。每个培训模块都从介绍开始,介绍每个人的角色、专业自我概念、常见误解和沟通障碍。接下来,我们进行了不同的模拟案例。每个案例都包括一个院前部分(护理人员和医学生)、一个交接部分(所有人)和一个 ED 部分(医学生和急诊护士)。每个培训模块结束后,我们评估参与者的“改变承诺”。在这个问卷中,学生被要求匿名说出他们希望因课程而实施的三个改变,以及他们对这些改变的承诺程度。

结果

共有 80 名参与者中的 64 名(80.0%)在参加培训模块后做出了至少一项改变承诺。总共 123 项承诺均匀分布在四个新兴类别中:态度、知识、技能和组织。大约三分之一的与行为和态度相关的承诺直接与跨专业主题相关(例如,“承认其他专业的工作”),并且在专业之间分布均匀。在两个月的随访中,32 名参与者(50%)对他们的原始承诺提供了书面反馈:62 项承诺中的 57 项(91.9%)在随访中至少部分实现,只有 5 项(8.1%)承诺完全没有实现。

结论

结构化的模拟增强干预成功地促进了急救护理实践的改变,同时共同培训团队合作和沟通技巧。