Johnson Earl E, Ricketts Todd A
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Mountain Home, TN 37684, USA.
Trends Amplif. 2010 Mar;14(1):12-45. doi: 10.1177/1084713810362988. Epub 2010 May 10.
The purpose of the study was to develop and examine a list of potential variables that may account for variability in the dispensing rates of four common hearing aid features. A total of 29 potential variables were identified and placed into the following categories: (1) characteristics of the audiologist, (2) characteristics of the hearing aids dispensed by the audiologist, (3) characteristics of the audiologist's patient population, and (4) evidence-based practice grades of recommendation for each feature. The potentially associative variables then were examined using regression analyses from the responses of 257 audiologists to a dispensing practice survey. There was a direct relation between price and level of hearing aid technology with the frequency of dispensing product features. There was also a direct relation between the belief by the audiologist that a feature might benefit patients and the frequency of dispensing that feature. In general, the results suggested that personal differences among audiologists and the hearing aids audiologists choose to dispense are related more strongly to dispensing rates of product features than to differences in characteristics of the patient population served by audiologists. An additional finding indicated that evidence-based practice recommendations were inversely related to dispensing rates of product features. This finding, however, may not be the result of dispensing trends as much as hearing aid manufacturing trends.
该研究的目的是制定并检验一份潜在变量清单,这些变量可能解释四种常见助听器功能的配发率差异。总共识别出29个潜在变量,并将其分为以下几类:(1)听力学家的特征;(2)听力学家配发的助听器的特征;(3)听力学家患者群体的特征;(4)针对每种功能的循证实践推荐等级。然后,利用257名听力学家对一份配发实践调查问卷的回复,通过回归分析对这些潜在的关联变量进行了检验。价格和助听器技术水平与产品功能的配发频率之间存在直接关系。听力学家认为某一功能可能使患者受益的信念与该功能的配发频率之间也存在直接关系。总体而言,结果表明,听力学家之间的个人差异以及听力学家选择配发的助听器与产品功能的配发率之间的关联,比听力学家所服务患者群体特征的差异更为紧密。另一项发现表明,循证实践推荐与产品功能的配发率呈负相关。然而,这一发现可能更多是助听器制造趋势的结果,而非配发趋势的结果。