Eriksholm Research Centre, Snekkersten, Denmark.
Ear Hear. 2013 Mar-Apr;34(2):193-202. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826a8ecd.
This study explored the meaning and determinants of optimal hearing aid use from the perspectives of hearing aid clients and audiologists. An additional objective was to contrast the perspectives of the clients and audiologists.
Four focus groups were conducted: (1) clients (n = 7) in Denmark, (2) clients (n = 10) in the United Kingdom, (3) audiologists (n = 6) in Denmark, and (4) audiologists (n = 7) in the United Kingdom. Clients owned hearing aids and audiologists had regular contact with clients. The focus group facilitators used a topic guide to generate the participants' views on optimal hearing aid use. The focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English if conducted in Danish, and qualitatively analyzed with content analysis.
Both clients and audiologists described optimal hearing aid use as being frequent and regular and driven by the individual needs of the clients. When describing determinants of optimal hearing aid use, both clients and audiologists mentioned the role of the client (e.g., adjustment to hearing aids), the role of the audiologist (e.g., audiologic practice and profession), and the role of the hearing aid (e.g., benefits and limitations of the hearing aid). They both highlighted the importance of client access to information. However, how clients and audiologists described the influence of these determinants varied somewhat. Clients emphasized the role of the hearing aid in achieving optimal hearing aid use. From a client perspective, hearing aids that performed well and had relevant features were most central. In contrast, audiologists emphasized the role of a good client-audiologist relationship in achieving optimal hearing aid use. From the audiologist's perspective, audiologists who were able to understand the needs of the clients and to instruct clients appropriately were most central.
This study highlights similarities and differences in how clients and audiologists describe optimal hearing aid use and its determinants. It is commendable that audiologists acknowledge the importance of the client-audiologist relationship, but given clients' focus on hearing aids, audiologists might wish to describe more explicitly to their clients how their intervention can extend beyond provision of the optimal hearing aid.
本研究从助听器使用者和听力学家的角度探讨了助听器使用的最佳含义和决定因素。另一个目的是对比使用者和听力学家的观点。
进行了 4 次焦点小组讨论:(1)丹麦的使用者(n=7),(2)英国的使用者(n=10),(3)丹麦的听力学家(n=6),和(4)英国的听力学家(n=7)。使用者拥有助听器,听力学家与使用者有定期的接触。焦点小组主持人使用主题指南来生成参与者对助听器使用最佳的看法。对焦点小组进行了录音、逐字转录,如果在丹麦进行的讨论则翻译成英文,并使用内容分析法进行定性分析。
使用者和听力学家都将最佳助听器使用描述为频繁和定期使用,并由使用者的个人需求驱动。在描述最佳助听器使用的决定因素时,使用者和听力学家都提到了使用者的角色(例如,助听器的调整)、听力学家的角色(例如,听力学实践和专业)和助听器的角色(例如,助听器的益处和局限性)。他们都强调了使用者获取信息的重要性。然而,使用者和听力学家对这些决定因素的描述略有不同。使用者强调了助听器在实现最佳助听器使用中的作用。从使用者的角度来看,表现良好且具有相关功能的助听器最为重要。相比之下,听力学家强调了良好的使用者-听力学家关系在实现最佳助听器使用中的作用。从听力学家的角度来看,能够理解使用者需求并适当地指导使用者的听力学家最为重要。
本研究强调了使用者和听力学家在描述最佳助听器使用及其决定因素方面的相似点和不同点。听力学家承认使用者-听力学家关系的重要性值得称赞,但考虑到使用者对助听器的关注,听力学家可能希望更明确地向其使用者描述他们的干预措施如何超越提供最佳助听器的范围。