Suppr超能文献

助听器中定向麦克风和降噪方案的有效性:证据的系统评价

Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence.

作者信息

Bentler Ruth A

机构信息

Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 2005 Jul-Aug;16(7):473-84. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16.7.7.

Abstract

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to find evidence of real-world effectiveness of directional microphone and digital noise reduction features in current hearing aids. The evidence was drawn from randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized intervention studies, and descriptive studies. The quality of each study was evaluated for factors such as blinding, power of statistical analyses, and use of psychometrically strong outcome measures. Weaknesses in the identified studies included small sample size, resultant poor power to detect potentially worthwhile differences, and overlapping experimental conditions. Nine studies were identified for directional microphones, and the evidence (albeit weak) supports effectiveness. Two studies were identified for the noise reduction feature, and the evidence was equivocal. For the researcher, such a systematic review should encourage the careful consideration of appropriate methodologies for assessing feature effectiveness. For the clinician, the outcomes reported herein should encourage use of such a systematic review to drive clinical practice.

摘要

我们对文献进行了系统回顾,以寻找当前助听器中定向麦克风和数字降噪功能在现实世界中的有效性证据。证据来源于随机对照试验、非随机干预研究和描述性研究。对每项研究的质量进行了评估,评估因素包括盲法、统计分析的功效以及使用心理测量学上强有力的结果测量方法。已确定研究中的弱点包括样本量小、检测潜在有价值差异的功效差以及实验条件重叠。确定了九项关于定向麦克风的研究,证据(尽管薄弱)支持其有效性。确定了两项关于降噪功能的研究,但证据并不明确。对于研究人员来说,这样的系统回顾应该促使他们仔细考虑评估功能有效性的适当方法。对于临床医生来说,本文报告的结果应该促使他们利用这样的系统回顾来推动临床实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验