• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者预期寿命对高眼压症治疗成本效益的影响。

Effect of patient's life expectancy on the cost-effectiveness of treatment for ocular hypertension.

作者信息

Kymes Steven M, Plotzke Michael R, Kass Michael A, Boland Michael V, Gordon Mae O

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8096, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110-1093, USA.

出版信息

Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 May;128(5):613-8. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.83.

DOI:10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.83
PMID:20457984
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4010144/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of expected life span on the cost-effectiveness of treating ocular hypertension to prevent primary open-angle glaucoma.

METHODS

We used a Markov simulation model to estimate the cost and benefit of ocular hypertension treatment over a person's remaining life. We examined the influence of age on the cost-effectiveness decision in 2 ways: (1) by evaluating specific age cohorts to assess the influence of age at the initiation of treatment; and (2) by evaluating the influence of a specific life span.

RESULTS

At a willingness to pay $50,000/quality-adjusted life year to $100,000/quality-adjusted life year, treatment of people with a 2% or greater annual risk of developing glaucoma was cost-effective for people aged 45 years with a life expectancy of at least 18 remaining years. However, to be cost-effective, a person aged 55 years must have a life expectancy of 21 remaining years and someone aged 65 years must have a life expectancy of 23 remaining years.

CONCLUSIONS

A person with ocular hypertension must have a life expectancy of at least 18 remaining years to justify treatment at a threshold of a 2% or greater annual risk of developing glaucoma. Persons at higher levels of risk require a life expectancy of 7 to 10 additional years to justify treatment.

摘要

目的

评估预期寿命对治疗高眼压症以预防原发性开角型青光眼成本效益的影响。

方法

我们使用马尔可夫模拟模型来估计一个人余生中高眼压症治疗的成本和效益。我们通过两种方式研究年龄对成本效益决策的影响:(1)评估特定年龄组以评估治疗开始时年龄的影响;(2)评估特定寿命的影响。

结果

在每质量调整生命年支付意愿为50,000美元至100,000美元的情况下,对于45岁且预期寿命至少还有18年的人,每年患青光眼风险为2%或更高的人群进行治疗具有成本效益。然而,要具有成本效益,55岁的人必须预期寿命还有21年,65岁的人必须预期寿命还有23年。

结论

高眼压症患者必须预期寿命至少还有18年,才能在每年患青光眼风险为2%或更高的阈值下证明治疗的合理性。风险较高的人群需要额外7至10年的预期寿命才能证明治疗的合理性。

相似文献

1
Effect of patient's life expectancy on the cost-effectiveness of treatment for ocular hypertension.患者预期寿命对高眼压症治疗成本效益的影响。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 May;128(5):613-8. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.83.
2
The influence of absolute cardiovascular risk, patient utilities, and costs on the decision to treat hypertension: a Markov decision analysis.绝对心血管风险、患者效用及成本对高血压治疗决策的影响:一项马尔可夫决策分析
J Hypertens. 2003 Sep;21(9):1753-9. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200309000-00026.
3
Cost-effectiveness.成本效益
Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115(8):1433; author reply 1433-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.03.002.
4
Cost-effectiveness.成本效益
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jan;116(1):166-7; author reply 167. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.037.
5
Cost-effectiveness of treating ocular hypertension.治疗高眼压症的成本效益
Ophthalmology. 2008 Jan;115(1):94-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.040.
6
Surveillance for ocular hypertension: an evidence synthesis and economic evaluation.眼压监测:证据综合与经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Jun;16(29):1-271, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta16290.
7
Cost-effectiveness.成本效益
Ophthalmology. 2008 Oct;115(10):1852-3; author reply 1853. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.05.002.
8
Management of ocular hypertension: a cost-effectiveness approach from the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.眼压过高的管理:来自眼压过高治疗研究的成本效益方法。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jun;141(6):997-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.01.019.
9
Long-term medical management of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in the UK: optimizing cost-effectiveness and clinic resources by minimizing therapy switches.英国原发性开角型青光眼和高眼压症的长期医学管理:通过最小化治疗转换来优化成本效益和临床资源。
J Glaucoma. 2012 Sep;21(7):433-49. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31821dac2a.
10
Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus drops for newly diagnosed ocular hypertension and glaucoma: the LiGHT RCT.选择性激光小梁成形术与滴眼液治疗新发眼压升高和青光眼的比较:LiGHT RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(31):1-102. doi: 10.3310/hta23310.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic methodological review of health state values in glaucoma cost-utility analyses.系统评价方法学在青光眼成本效用分析中健康状态值的研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Nov;25(8):1417-1435. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01663-x. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
2
Modeling the Pharmacotherapy Cost and Outcomes of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma With Dry Eye.模拟原发性开角型青光眼合并干眼的药物治疗成本及结果
Front Public Health. 2019 Dec 20;7:363. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00363. eCollection 2019.
3
Acute primary angle closure-treatment strategies, evidences and economical considerations.急性原发性闭角型青光眼的治疗策略、证据与经济考量。
Eye (Lond). 2019 Jan;33(1):110-119. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0278-x. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
4
Managing glaucoma in developing countries.发展中国家青光眼的管理
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2011 Mar-Apr;74(2):83-4. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492011000200001.
5
Cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma in developed countries.在发达国家,开角型青光眼筛查的成本效益。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;59 Suppl(Suppl1):S24-30. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.73684.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of ocular hypertension: a cost-effectiveness approach from the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.眼压过高的管理:来自眼压过高治疗研究的成本效益方法。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jun;141(6):997-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.01.019.
2
United States life tables, 2003.《2003年美国生命表》
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006 Apr 19;54(14):1-40.
3
A multicenter, retrospective pilot study of resource use and costs associated with severity of disease in glaucoma.一项关于青光眼疾病严重程度相关资源利用和成本的多中心回顾性试点研究。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Jan;124(1):12-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.1.12.
4
Medicare coverage for technological innovations--time for new criteria?医疗保险对技术创新的覆盖——是时候制定新标准了吗?
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2199-203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb032612.
5
Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States.美国成年人中开角型青光眼的患病率。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):532-8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.532.
6
Cost-utility analysis of cataract surgery in the second eye.第二只眼白内障手术的成本效用分析
Ophthalmology. 2003 Dec;110(12):2310-7. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00796-6.
7
What is the cost of blindness?失明的代价是什么?
Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Oct;87(10):1201-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.10.1201.
8
What is the price of life and why doesn't it increase at the rate of inflation?生命的代价是什么,为什么它没有以通货膨胀率的速度增长?
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 28;163(14):1637-41. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.14.1637.
9
Prevention of herpes simplex virus eye disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis.单纯疱疹病毒性眼病的预防:一项成本效益分析。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Jan;121(1):108-12. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.1.108.
10
The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma.眼压升高治疗研究:一项随机试验确定局部降眼压药物可延缓或预防原发性开角型青光眼的发病。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;120(6):701-13; discussion 829-30. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.6.701.