Suppr超能文献

医源性胃酸抑制与医院获得性艰难梭菌感染风险

Iatrogenic gastric acid suppression and the risk of nosocomial Clostridium difficile infection.

作者信息

Howell Michael D, Novack Victor, Grgurich Philip, Soulliard Diane, Novack Lena, Pencina Michael, Talmor Daniel

机构信息

Silverman Institute for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2010 May 10;170(9):784-90. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.89.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile infections are increasing. Acid-suppressive therapy has been suggested as a risk factor for C difficile, but this remains controversial.

METHODS

We conducted a pharmacoepidemiologic cohort study, performing a secondary analysis of data collected prospectively on 101 796 discharges from a tertiary care medical center during a 5-year period. The primary exposure of interest was acid suppression therapy, classified by the most intense acid suppression therapy received (no acid suppression, histamine(2)-receptor antagonist [H(2)RA] therapy, daily proton pump inhibitor [PPI], and PPI more frequently than daily).

RESULTS

As the level of acid suppression increased, the risk of nosocomial C difficile infection increased, from 0.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21%-0.31%) in patients not receiving acid suppressive therapy to 0.6% (95% CI, 0.49%-0.79%) in those receiving H(2)RA therapy, to 0.9% (95% CI, 0.80%-0.98%) in those receiving daily PPI treatment, and to 1.4% (1.15%-1.71%) in those receiving more frequent PPI therapy. After adjustment for comorbid conditions, age, antibiotics, and propensity score-based likelihood of receipt of acid-suppression therapy, the association persisted, increasing from an odds ratio of 1 (no acid suppression [reference]) to 1.53 (95% CI, 1.12-2.10) (H(2)RA), to 1.74 (95% CI, 1.39-2.18) (daily PPI), and to 2.36 (95% CI, 1.79-3.11) (more frequent PPI). Similar estimates were found with a matched cohort analysis and with nested case-control techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing levels of pharmacologic acid suppression are associated with increased risks of nosocomial C difficile infection. This evidence of a dose-response effect provides further support for the potentially causal nature of iatrogenic acid suppression in the development of nosocomial C difficile infection.

摘要

背景

艰难梭菌感染的发病率和严重程度正在上升。抑酸治疗被认为是艰难梭菌感染的一个危险因素,但这仍存在争议。

方法

我们进行了一项药物流行病学队列研究,对一家三级医疗中心在5年期间前瞻性收集的101796例出院患者的数据进行二次分析。主要关注的暴露因素是抑酸治疗,根据接受的最强抑酸治疗进行分类(无抑酸治疗、组胺2受体拮抗剂[H2RA]治疗、每日质子泵抑制剂[PPI]治疗以及比每日更频繁的PPI治疗)。

结果

随着抑酸水平的升高,医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的风险增加,未接受抑酸治疗的患者中为0.3%(95%置信区间[CI],0.21% - 0.31%),接受H2RA治疗的患者中为0.6%(95%CI,0.49% - 0.79%),接受每日PPI治疗的患者中为0.9%(95%CI,0.80% - 0.98%),接受更频繁PPI治疗的患者中为1.4%(1.15% - 1.71%)。在对合并症、年龄、抗生素以及基于倾向评分的接受抑酸治疗的可能性进行调整后,这种关联仍然存在,比值比从1(无抑酸治疗[参考值])增加到1.53(95%CI,1.12 - 2.10)(H2RA),到1.74(95%CI,1.39 - 2.18)(每日PPI),再到2.36(95%CI,1.79 - 3.11)(更频繁PPI)。在匹配队列分析和巢式病例对照技术中也发现了类似的估计值。

结论

药物性抑酸水平的升高与医院获得性艰难梭菌感染风险的增加相关。这种剂量反应效应的证据为医源性抑酸在医院获得性艰难梭菌感染发生中潜在的因果性质提供了进一步支持。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验