Suppr超能文献

质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体阻滞剂在心脏外科人群中的疗效和安全性:来自 PEPTIC 试验的见解。

Efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors versus histamine-2 receptor blockers in the cardiac surgical population: insights from the PEPTIC trial.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jul 11;62(2). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac124.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The comparative effectiveness and safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) versus histamine-2 receptor blockers for stress ulcer prophylaxis in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit population is uncertain. Although the Proton Pump Inhibitors versus Histamine-2 Receptor Blockers for Ulcer Prophylaxis Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit (PEPTIC) trial reported a higher risk of mortality in the PPI arm with no difference in gastrointestinal bleeding, detailed information on surgical variables and clinically relevant surgical subgroups was not available.

METHODS

The analysis included all Canadian cardiac surgery patients enrolled in the PEPTIC trial. Data were electronically linked using unique patient identifiers to a clinical information system. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, gastrointestinal bleeding, Clostridium difficile infections, ventilator-associated conditions and length of stay.

RESULTS

We studied 823 (50.6%) randomized to PPIs and 805 (49.4%) to histamine-2-receptor blockers. In the intention-to-treat analysis, there were no differences in hospital mortality [PPI: 4.3% vs histamine-2 receptor blockers: 4.8%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-1.70], gastrointestinal bleeding (3.9% vs 4.8%, aOR 1.09, 95% CI 0.66-1.81), C. difficile infections (0.9% vs 0.1%, aOR 0.18, 95% CI 0.02-1.59), ventilator-associated conditions (1.6% vs 1.7%, aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-1.00) or median length of stay (9.2 vs 9.8 days, adjusted risk ratio 1.06, 85% CI 0.99-1.13). No significant treatment differences were observed among subgroups of interest or per-protocol populations.

CONCLUSIONS

In a secondary analysis of cardiac surgery patients enrolled in the PEPTIC trial in Canada, no differences in effectiveness or safety were observed between use of PPIs and histamine-2 receptor blockers for stress ulcer prophylaxis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

anzctr.org.au identifier: ACTRN12616000481471.

摘要

目的

质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)与组胺-2 受体阻滞剂(H2RAs)在心脏外科重症监护病房(ICU)应激性溃疡预防中的比较效果和安全性尚不确定。尽管质子泵抑制剂与组胺-2 受体阻滞剂用于 ICU 溃疡预防治疗(PEPTIC)试验报告 PPI 组的死亡率较高,但胃肠出血无差异,但没有关于手术变量和临床相关手术亚组的详细信息。

方法

该分析包括参加 PEPTIC 试验的所有加拿大心脏手术患者。使用唯一的患者标识符通过电子方式将数据链接到临床信息系统。感兴趣的结果包括院内死亡率、胃肠出血、艰难梭菌感染、呼吸机相关并发症和住院时间。

结果

我们研究了 823 名(50.6%)随机分配至 PPI 组和 805 名(49.4%)至 H2RA 组。在意向治疗分析中,院内死亡率无差异[PPI:4.3% vs H2RA:4.8%,调整后的优势比(aOR)0.97,95%置信区间(CI)0.55-1.70]、胃肠出血(3.9% vs 4.8%,aOR 1.09,95% CI 0.66-1.81)、艰难梭菌感染(0.9% vs 0.1%,aOR 0.18,95% CI 0.02-1.59)、呼吸机相关并发症(1.6% vs 1.7%,aOR 0.92,95% CI 0.85-1.00)或中位住院时间(9.2 天 vs 9.8 天,调整后的风险比 1.06,95% CI 0.99-1.13)。在感兴趣的亚组或按方案人群中未观察到治疗效果或安全性的显著差异。

结论

在加拿大 PEPTIC 试验中纳入的心脏手术患者的二次分析中,与组胺-2 受体阻滞剂相比,使用质子泵抑制剂预防应激性溃疡在有效性或安全性方面无差异。

临床试验注册号

anzctr.org.au 标识符:ACTRN12616000481471。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3643/9334785/e8320bf9037e/ezac124f2.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验