Bravata Dawn M, Wells Carolyn K, Lo Albert C, Nadeau Steven E, Melillo Jean, Chodkowski Diane, Struve Frederick, Williams Linda S, Peixoto Aldo J, Gorman Mark, Goel Punit, Acompora Gregory, McClain Vincent, Ranjbar Noshene, Tabereaux Paul B, Boice John L, Jacewicz Michael, Concato John
Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center of Excellence on Implementing Evidence-Based Practice and the HSR&D Stroke Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, HSR&D Mail Code 11H, 1481 W 10th St, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2010 May 10;170(9):804-10. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.92.
Many processes of care have been proposed as metrics to evaluate stroke care. We sought to identify processes of stroke care that are associated with improved patient outcomes after adjustment for both patient characteristics and other process measures.
This retrospective cohort study included patients 18 years or older with an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) onset no more than 2 days before admission and a neurologic deficit on admission. Patients were excluded if they resided in a skilled nursing facility, were already admitted to the hospital at stroke onset, or were transferred from another acute-care facility. The combined outcome included in-hospital mortality, discharge to hospice, or discharge to a skilled nursing facility. Seven processes of stroke care were evaluated: fever management, hypoxia management, blood pressure management, neurologic evaluation, swallowing evaluation, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, and early mobilization. Risk adjustment included age, comorbidity (medical history), concomitant medical illness present at admission, preadmission symptom course, prestroke functional status, code status, stroke severity, nonneurologic status, modified APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) III score, and admission brain imaging findings.
Among 1487 patients, the outcome was observed in 239 (16%). Three processes of care were independently associated with an improvement in the outcome after adjustment: swallowing evaluation (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.94); DVT prophylaxis (adjusted OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.96); and treating all episodes of hypoxia with supplemental oxygen (adjusted OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.73).
Outcomes among patients with ischemic stroke or TIA can be improved by attention to swallowing function, DVT prophylaxis, and treatment of hypoxia.
许多护理流程已被提议作为评估卒中护理的指标。我们试图确定在对患者特征和其他流程指标进行调整后,与改善患者预后相关的卒中护理流程。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了年龄在18岁及以上、入院前2天内发生缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)且入院时有神经功能缺损的患者。如果患者居住在专业护理机构、卒中发作时已住院或从另一家急性护理机构转来,则被排除。综合结局包括住院死亡率、出院至临终关怀机构或出院至专业护理机构。评估了七个卒中护理流程:发热管理、缺氧管理、血压管理、神经学评估、吞咽评估、深静脉血栓形成(DVT)预防和早期活动。风险调整包括年龄、合并症(病史)、入院时存在的伴随内科疾病情况、入院前症状过程、卒中前功能状态、代码状态、卒中严重程度、非神经学状态、改良急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)III评分以及入院时脑部影像学检查结果。
在1487例患者中,239例(16%)出现了该结局。调整后,三个护理流程与结局改善独立相关:吞咽评估(调整后的优势比[OR]为0.64;95%置信区间[CI]为0.43 - 0.94);DVT预防(调整后的OR为0.60;95% CI为0.37 - 0.96);以及用补充氧气治疗所有缺氧发作(调整后的OR为0.26;95% CI为0.09 - 0.73)。
关注吞咽功能、DVT预防和缺氧治疗可改善缺血性卒中和TIA患者的预后。